⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “REYNOLDS v. LEEKE”

District Court, D. South Carolina · 2008-05-11 · Published · cited 40× · 586 F. Supp. 2d 548; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38175; 2008 WL 2076731
(2008) Willie S. MERRIWEATHER, Plaintiff, v. Cecilia REYNOLDS, Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution; Jon E. Ozmint, Director of SCDC; Dennis Patterson, Director of Inmate Records State Classification SCDC; Linda M. Coley, LPN; Doris A Cooke, of Medical Health Cares; Lt. James Jefferson, of Kershaw Correctional Institution; Cheryl Long, Case Manager; Jeanie Baker; James Wakeley; and Teresa Levy, in their individual and official capacities fo
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998-03-31 · Published · cited 2× · 4 F. Supp. 2d 1055; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4801
4 F.Supp.2d 1055 (1998) Johnny REYNOLDS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 85-T-665-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 31, 1998. *1056 Robert L. Wiggins, Jr., Ann K. Wiggins, Russell W. Adams, Abigail P. Van Alstyne, Kimberly C. P
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975-12-01 · Published · cited 192× · 529 F.2d 854; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 11705
529 F.2d 854 James E. SWEET, Appellant,v.SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director WilliamD. Leeke, Appellee. No. 74--1118. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit. Argued April 8, 1975.Decided Dec. 1, 1975. Richard L. C. Sullivan, Columbia, S.C. (court-assigned counsel), for appellant.
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976-07-13 · Published · cited 8× · 539 S.W.2d 715
539 S.W.2d 715 (1976) Frank A. STRAKE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., a corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 36777, 36778. Missouri Court of Appeals, St. Louis District, Division Three. July 13, 1976. *716 Evans & Dixon, Eugene K. Buckley, St. Louis, for defendants-appellants. Hearnes,
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965-09-15 · Published · cited 6× · 351 F.2d 415; 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4490
SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge (dissenting) : In overturning these judgments in favor of one injured seaman and the surviving dependents of another, the court, I submit, takes too narrow a view of the Supreme Court’s holding in Sinkler v. Missouri Pacific R. R. Co., 356 U.S. 326, 78 S.Ct. 758, 2 L.Ed.2d 799 (1958). That case emphasizes that an “accommodating scope” must b
New York Supreme Court · 1803-11-15 · Published · cited 0× · 1 Cai. Cas. 444
Per Curiam. Reynolds has, by his admissions, (a) recog*555nized Low as his landlord ; he cannot, therefore, be admitted to dispute his title. Whether, therefore, the evidence was properly or improperly received, cannot be inquired into, nor can the defendant take any thing by his motion. [1]
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001-03-14 · Published · cited 0× · 173 Or. App. 106; 20 P.3d 857; 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 325
BREWER, J. Plaintiff brought this action for declaratory and other relief against defendants City of Bandon and its city manager (collectively “the city”) and the state of Oregon, acting through its Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Plaintiff contended that various enactments and actions by the city, taken in part pursuant to a loan agreement between the city and DEQ, violated city charter limitations on water and sew
Day Jr. v. Haskettpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2021-08-10 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________________ ) ROGER CHARLES DAY, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-0806 (EGS) ) DAVID H
State v. Andrewspublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-11-23 · Published · cited 0× · 2022 Ohio 4209
[Cite as State v. Andrews, 2022-Ohio-4209.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 111455 v. : CE’MATIZEA ANDREWS, :
People v. Mathewspublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-03-16 · Published · cited 8× · 118 N.Y.S.3d 819; 181 A.D.3d 1103; 2020 NY Slip Op 1864
People v Mathews (2020 NY Slip Op 01864) People v Mathews 2020 NY Slip Op 01864 Decided on March 16, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Jones v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018-04-16 · Published · cited 6× · 813 S.E.2d 360
Grant, Justice. Jahbari Jones ("Jones") appeals his convictions for malice murder and theft by taking in connection with the shooting death of his cousin, Tradae Jones. Jones contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions and that the trial court erred in instructing the jury during the separate trial on the issue of Jones's mental competency, in excluding statements Jones made to police by telephone after th
Mathews v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022-08-09 · Published · cited 0× · 877 S.E.2d 188; 314 Ga. 360
314 Ga. 360 FINAL COPY S22A0670. MATHEWS v. THE STATE. PETERSON, Presiding Justice. Following a joint trial with co-defendant Shelton Jackson, Jarvis Mathews was convicted of felony murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony for the fatal shooting of Grant Reynolds and the non-fatal shootings of Larentae and Roger Mumphery.1 On appeal, Mathews argues that 1 The crimes occurred on May 17, 2001. In November
Kao v. Joy Holidaypublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2020-12-07 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 11/12/20; Certified for Publication 12/7/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE MING-HSIANG KAO, Plaintiff and Respondent, A157886 A158531 v. (San Mateo County JOY HOLIDAY, et al., Super.
Leek v. Cooperpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2011-04-15 · Published · cited 103× · 194 Cal. App. 4th 399; 125 Cal. Rptr. 3d 56
Opinion BLEASE, J. This is a pleading case masquerading as a summary judgment case. Employees of a corporate-owned car dealership sued the corporation and its sole shareholder, alleging causes of action for age discrimination and violation of California’s Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act (Gov. Code, § 12945.1 et seq.; hereafter Family Rights Act). The trial court granted the shareholder’s motions for summ
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2016-01-27 · Published · cited 11× · 415 S.C. 256; 781 S.E.2d 903
Acting Justice TOAL. The underlying dispute in this case involves the repair of faulty windows and sliding glass doors in a condominium development, Shipyard Village Horizontal Property Regime (Shipyard Village), in Pawleys Island, South Carolina. Fifty co-owners of units in Buildings C & D of the development (Petitioners) appeal the court of appeals’ decision reversing the
Jones v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018-04-16 · Published · cited 2× · 303 Ga. 496
303 Ga. 496 FINAL COPY S18A0263. JONES v. THE STATE. GRANT, Justice. Jahbari Jones (“Jones”) appeals his convictions for malice murder and theft by taking in connection with the shooting death of his cousin, Tradae Jones. Jones contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions and that the trial court erred in instructing the jury during the separate trial on the issue of Jones’s mental competency, in excluding statements
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014-06-25 · Published · cited 3× · 409 S.C. 164; 760 S.E.2d 121
KONDUROS, J. The Shipyard Village Council of Co-Owners, Inc. (the Council) appeals the circuit court’s grant of partial summary judgment to owners of condominiums within the development in the case involving faulty windows and sliding doors. The Council argues it did not have a duty to investigate, the business judgment rule should have applied, and a jury could have found it did not breach any duty. We affirm in part, reverse
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980-10-10 · Published · cited 12× · 629 F.2d 1327; 1982 A.M.C. 2103
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Appellant Bumble Bee Seafoods Company (Bumble Bee) petitions for review of a final order of the Benefits Review Board (Board) granting benefits for total disability to appellee Reynold Hansen under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-50 (1976) (the Act). We affirm. I FACTS Reynold Hansen worked as a
State v. Mortonpublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021-11-12 · Published · cited 51× · 966 N.W.2d 57; 310 Neb. 355
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 02/04/2022 08:07 AM CST - 355 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports STATE v. MORTON Cite as 310 Neb. 355 State of Nebraska, a
State v. Woodspublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011-11-10 · Published · cited 7× · 2011 Ohio 5825
[Cite as State v. Woods, 2011-Ohio-5825.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96487 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.