Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “REYNOLDS v. RIGNEY”
Rigney v. Department of Policepublic domain
In re Rigney, Reynolds;—Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review City Civil Service Commission Orleans, Nos. 7410, 7412; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-CA-1435. Denied. KNOLL, J., would grant. GUIDRY, J., would grant.
Rigney v. Department of Policepublic domain
DAVID S. GORBATY, Judge. 11 In this appeal, Reynolds Rigney and Jake Schnapp contend that the Civil Service Commission erroneously denied their appeals and upheld their terminations. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On December 30, 2006, appellant Jake Schnapp was in command of a plainclothes contingent of New Orleans police officers
Rigney v. Department of Policepublic domain
In re Schnapp, Jake; — Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court’s action dated September 25, 2009; City Civil Service Commission Orleans, Nos. 7412, 7410; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-CA-1435. Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, Section 6.
Rigney v. Department of Policepublic domain
In re Rigney, Reynolds; — Plaintiff; Applying for Reconsideration of this Court Action dated September 25, 2009; City Civil Service Commission Orleans, Nos. 7410, 7412; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-CA-1435. Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, Section 6.
Rigney v. Department of Policepublic domain
In re Schnapp, Jake;—Plaintiff; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review City Civil Service Commission Orleans, Nos. 7412, 7410; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2008-CA-1435. Denied. KNOLL, J., would grant. GUIDRY, J„ would grant.
Rigney v. Department of Policepublic domain
21 So.3d 315 (2009) Reynolds RIGNEY and Jake Schnapp v. DEPARTMENT OF POLICE. No. 2009-C-1069. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 6, 2009. Not considered. See Louisiana Supreme Court Rule IX, Section 6.
Rigney v. Department of Policepublic domain
18 So.3d 83 (2009) Reynolds RIGNEY and Jake Schnapp v. DEPARTMENT OF POLICE. No. 2009-C-1063. Supreme Court of Louisiana. September 25, 2009. Denied. KNOLL, J., would grant. GUIDRY, J., would grant.
Fraser v. Reynoldspublic domain
588 So.2d 448 (1991) Russell M. FRASER v. R. Scott REYNOLDS, et al. Bobby R. LEWIS v. R. Scott REYNOLDS, et al. 88-1466, 88-1522. Supreme Court of Alabama. July 26, 1991. Rehearing Denied August 30, 1991. *449 H. Harold Stephens of Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne, Huntsville, for appellant Bobby R. Lew
Fraser v. Reynoldspublic domain
The defendants, Bobby R. Lewis and Russell M. Fraser, appeal separately from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, R. Scott Reynolds, Gregory S. Windham, Kenneth Tichansky, and Teresa Scholz, in this action to recover damages for fraud. We affirm in part, but remand the case for a determination as to the question of excessiveness of the damages, in accordance with Hammond v. City of Gadsden,493 So.2d 1374 (Ala. 198
Reynolds v. Mitchellpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 229 R. Scott Reynolds and Gregory Windham brought suit in the Circuit Court of Madison County against Joe C. Mitchell, Bobby R. Lewis, and Russell M. Fraser, all individually and as general partners of the Margaret Clara apartments complex. Richard Tichansky and Teresa Scholz also were initially named as defenda
Reynolds v. Mitchellpublic domain
This case involves a dispute between four investors in a limited partnership and the three general partners in the partnership. Plaintiff investors alleged that the defendant general partners had committed fraud, breached their fiduciary duties, and breached the contract between the parties. The trial court held for the defendants. We affirm. The facts as found by the trial court, in part, are as follows: "Defendants Joe C. Mitchell, Bobby R. Lewis, and Russ
Brown v. Erb-Harper-Rigney Co.public domain
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BRANTLY delivered the opinion of the court. Action to foreclose a chattel mortgage. This appeal is from an order of the district court refusing to appoint a receiver [1] pendente lite. On February 3, 1912, the defendant Erb-Harper-Rigney Company, a mercantile corporation doing business at Laurel, Yellowstone county, being financially embarrassed, made an assignmen
Reynolds v. North Side Canal Co.public domain
BUDGE, C. J. This is a mandamm proceeding. The material allegations of fact contained in petitioner’s affidavit-are as follows: That petitioner acquired the legal title to certain lands in Jerome county, embodied in a Carey Act segregation; that the contract for the construction of an irrigation system was entered into between the state of Idaho and the Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Company; that the Ca
Rigney v. . Rigneypublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 410 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 411 The courts of this state are commanded by the Constitution and statutes of the United States to give such faith and credit to
Spratling v. Spratlingpublic domain
720 S.W.2d 936 (1986) Obie SPRATLING, Appellant, v. Gladys SPRATLING, Appellee. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. December 12, 1986. *937 Pate, Bailey & Rigney, G. William Bailey, Jr., Elizabethtown, for appellant. Lewis, Bland, Preston & Birdwhistell, Barry Birdwhistell, Elizabethtown, for appellee. Before HAYES, C.J., and HOWE
State v. Williamspublic domain
LILJEBERG, J. Defendant, Lawrence Williams, appeals his convictions and sentences for two counts of armed robbery with a firearm. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant's convictions, vacate his sentences and remand with instructions. We also grant appellate counsel's motion to withdraw as attorney of record for defendant. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February
Strauss v. City of Chicagopublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
Strauss v. City of Chicagopublic domain
2021 IL App (1st) 191977 No. 1-19-1977 SIXTH DIVISION March 5, 2021 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT BRIAN J. STRAUSS, Individually and d/b/a
Philip Bartling v. Fruehauf Corporationpublic domain
29 F.3d 1062 63 USLW 2116, 18 Employee Benefits Cas. 1772 Philip BARTLING; Lee E. Anthony; Jim Anon; DavidArmstrong; Carl Benefield; James Bushu; Don Capper;Howard Collingsworth; Ron Craig; Lloyd Daugherty; NelsonDeane; Jerry DeMent; Larry Donohue; Richard Dawson;Philip Edwards; Sam Egger; James Fairchild; WilliamEinnell; Melvin Foster; Ernest Frazier; LaRue Gregory;Thedore Grin
Berry v. City of Chicagopublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity