Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROMULO RICHARDSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-3161 (UNA) ) DIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ROMULO RICHARDSON, et al., ) on behalf of A.G.H. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-02585 (UNA) ) DIST

MEMORANDUM OPINION Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge Plaintiff Jasmin Richardson filed suit under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., to seek review of a Hearing Officer’s determination that Defendant District of Columbia correctly concluded that her minor son, C.S., did not have a qualifying disability in

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA T. CARLTON RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 09-01856 (HHK) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION T. Carlton Richardson’s license to practice law has been suspended as a result

711 F.Supp.2d 115 (2010) T. Carlton RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-01856 (HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 14, 2010. *117 T. Carlton Richardson, Washington, DC, pro se. Thomas Louis Koger, Office of the Attorney General, Noah Anthony Clem

MEMORANDUM OPINION TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Charlotte M. Richardson brings this action against the District of Columbia Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services (“DYRS”) alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 (2000);

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.

962 F.Supp. 1 (1997) T. Carlton RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-02535(SS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 27, 1997. T. Carlton Richardson, Washington, pro se. Charles W. Scarborough, Arnold & Porter, Lisa Annette Bell, Office of Corporation Counsel, Washingt

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM: This appeal arises from a dispute over the amount of certain District of Columbia inheritance taxes. Appellants paid the taxes under protest and then sought a partial refund by filing an appeal in the Tax Division of the Superior Court under D.C.Code § 47-3303 (1986 Supp.). The court granted the District’s motion for summary judgment. We hold that the record does not support the award of summary judgment to the D

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Faced with disciplinary proceedings in Florida, T. Carlton Richardson petitioned the Supreme Court of Florida for permission to resign, with leave to reapply in three years. The court granted the petition and deemed Richardson to have resigned.

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge Plaintiff Andrea Richardson, a transgender woman, claims that she was sexually assaulted by her male cellmate while incarcerated in the District of Columbia jail-specifically, its Central Detention Facility in Southeast D.C. She brought this lawsuit against the District and several jail officials alleging that they failed to protect her from the assault. The defendants have moved f

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This cause came on for consideration on the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and was argued by counsel. On consideration thereof, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the trial court herein is affirmed. Statement of Associate Judge NEBEKER in voting to affirm. Statement of Chief Judge NEWMAN, dissenting, at

l\\§ FILED MAY 1 7 2311 Cl€l’k. U.S. District & Bankruptcy courts for the District of columbia UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBlA Delliccia Sherrell Honore-Richardson, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 11 U91? Superior Court of the District of Columbia et al., Defendants. §§/S§/§/&%/§/S/§R/§/ MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on review of the plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis The application will be granted

(2008) Wanda RICHARDSON, Mother and Next Friend of W.R., a minor, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-2121 (CKK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge. Plaintiff Wanda Richardson, on behalf of her minor son, W.R., b

807 F.Supp.2d 37 (2011) Garrina BYRD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. No. 1:06-cv-00522 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 16, 2011. *44 Abby Morrow Richardson, Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantazis, PLLC, Gary T. Brown, Gary T. Brown & Associates, Washington, DC, Timothy B

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, District Judge. A jury found for plaintiff Carmen Jean-Baptiste on her Title VII and D.C. Human Rights Act (DCHRA) sexual harassment claims, her Title VII and DCHRA retaliation claims, and her D.C. Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) claims. Jean-Baptiste now moves [187] for equitable relief pursuant to thos

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. Following a six-day trial in which the jury returned a verdict on all counts and a $3.5 million compensatory award for plaintiff Carmen Jean-Baptiste, the defendant District of Columbia (“the District”) filed this Motion [188] for a New Trial, a New Trial on Damages or, in the Alternative, for R

134 A.2d 492 (1957) Willis L. RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. No. 2007. Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Argued June 17, 1957. Decided August 30, 1957. Gilbert R. Giordano, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, Milton D