Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FREDERICK R. BUCKLES, United States Magistrate Judge. Presently pending before the Court is plaintiff Wendi Ferguson Sellers’ Motion for Supplemental Award of Attorneys’ Fees (filed January 18, 2008/Docket No. 280). All matters are pending before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge, with consent of the parties, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Opinion issued February 28, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00158-CV ——————————— MARK ALAN SWANSON, Appellant V. ROBERT DANNY CLACK, II, Appellee

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. William C. (Billy) Sellers, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2021-000910 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Edgefield County Eugene C. Griffith Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28188 Heard March 30, 2023 – Filed January 17, 2024 AFFIRMED Chief Appellate Defender Ro

05/09/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 2, 2017 WAYNE SELLERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 13-00442 J. Robert Carter, Jr., Judge __________________________________

SMITH, Circuit Judge. Alan Todd Brown appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment to Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LP) on Brown’s claims for fraudulent misrepresentation, unfair or deceptive practices, and breach of warranty against LP for the purported defectiveness of its TrimBoard product. We affirm. <

03/13/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE October 24, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL ROBERT QUINN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 117742 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge ___________________________________

No. 14-14-00785-CV IN THE FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/25/2015 6:46:14 AM at Houston CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk ___________

USCA11 Case: 21-14503 Document: 70-1 Date Filed: 11/27/2023 Page: 1 of 42 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14503 ____________________ ROBERT PONZIO, ALEX ACUNA,

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT BRISEÑO; CHRISTI TOOMER; No. 19-56297 KELLY MCFADDEN; JANETH RUIZ; BRENDA KREIN; ALEXIS JUSTAK; D.C. No. LEONORA ULITSKY; ANNE COWAN; 2:11-cv-05379- JULIE PALMER; PATTY BOYER; CJC-AGR NECLA MUSAT; PAULINE MICHAEL; RONA JOHNSTON; CHERI SHAFSTALL; JILL CROUCH; ERIKA HEINS; OPINION MAUREEN TOWEY; MICHELE ANDRADE; AN

ZAGER, Justice. In this disciplinary case, the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (Board) charged an attorney with violations of several of - our ethical rules arising out of two separate matters. After a hearing, the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa found that in the first matter, the attorney violated the rules regarding conflicts of interest and c

667 N.W.2d 379 (2003) 256 Mich. App. 505 ALAN CUSTOM HOMES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterdefendant-Appellee, v. Kenneth KROL and Karen Krol, Defendants/Counterplaintiffs-Appellants. Docket No. 237138. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted March 5, 2003, at Detroit. Decided May 8, 2003, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication J

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Andrea R. Wood, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Alan Carlson and Peter DeLu-ca claim that when they were' terminated from their long-time employment with Northrop Grumman Technical Services, Inc., they were denied severance benefits that they should have received in accordance-with the Northrop Grumman Severance Plan (“Plan”). Plaintiffs allege that they were denied sever

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Joan B. Gottschall, United States District Judge Before the court are cross motions-for partial summary judgment and a motion:to dismiss two antitrust counterclaims pleaded in the defendants’ amended answer. The motions for summary judgment primarily involve a contract formation dispute with an antecedent choice-of-law question. Finding that the United Nations Convention on Co

OPINION Opinion by: Patricia 0. Alvarez, Justice . This case arises from a contractual dispute stemming from a Farm and Ranch Contract between Appellants Robert Marx and Debbie Marx, ,as sellers, and Appellee FDP, LP, as buyer. The Farm and.Raneh Contract was modified by an August 27, 2013 Mediated Settlement Agreement .and clarified on

KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part: The majority opinion holds that key tax-related provisions of the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act may be unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause’s minimum contacts principle. The majority opinion therefore affirms the District Court’s preliminary injunction barring the Federal Govern

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–1824 Filed May 13, 2016 Amended July 28, 2016 IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, vs. LARRY ALAN STOLLER, Respondent. On review of the report of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa. Grievance commission reports respondent committed ethical misconduct involving two clients and recomme

604 F.Supp.2d 1188 (2009) In re ULTA SALON, COSMETICS & FRAGRANCE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 07 C 7083. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 19, 2009. *1191 Robert P. Frutkin, Deborah R. Gross, Law Offices of Bernard M. Gross P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Daniel S. Sommers, Cohen, Milstein, Sellers &am;

BROWN, Judge. [1] County of Lake (“Lake County”) and the Lake County Plan Commission (the “Plan Commission,!’. and collectively with Lake County, the “Appellants”) appeal the trial court’s finding in favor of Alan J. and Roderick Pahl 1 (collectively the “Appellees”) -and raise two ■ issues, which we revise and restat

ACCEPTED 03-15-00408-CV 6669180 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 22, 2012 Decided June 28, 2013 No. 12-5031 ROBERT GORDON, APPELLEE v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 12-5051 Appeals from the United Sta