Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “RODGER DALE CHAMBERS”
Gammons, Roger Dalepublic domain
PD ________-15 September 9, 2015 PD ________-15 PD ________-15 ________________ IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ________________ RODGER GAMMONS,
Gammons, Roger Dalepublic domain
PD-1159&1186&1187-15 PD-1159&1186&1187-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 9/16/2015 2:30:48 PM Accepted 9/18/2015 5:15:52 PM
In Re Chambers Development Securities Litigationpublic domain
912 F.Supp. 822 (1995) In re CHAMBERS DEVELOPMENT SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: All Class Actions. MDL-982. Civil A. No. 92-0679. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. May 30, 1995. *823 *824 Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates, Jr., Pittsburgh, PA, M
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. CompManagement, Inc.public domain
Pfeifer, J., dissenting. {¶ 72} The Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law concluded that CompManagement’s “representation of employers’ interests in handling claims before the Industrial Commission on behalf of employers amounts to the unauthorized practice of law.” The board concluded that Comp-Management’s “negotiation and involvement with settling claims before the Industrial Commission o
Hurd v. Superior Courtpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1102 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1103 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NO
HILL, Justice. [T1] In this worker's compensation case, Appeliant, Joshua Todd Alphin (Alphin), challenges the order of the district court which affirmed the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order" issued by a hearing examiner for the Office of Administrative Hearings. Alphin contends that the hearing examiner abused his discretion and acted in a manner that was arbitrary, capricious or not otherwise in accordance wit
Hernandez v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.public domain
337 S.W.3d 531 (2009) 2009 Ark. App. 531 Gladis HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellee. No. CA 08-961. Court of Appeals of Arkansas. July 1, 2009. Sterling Law Firm, P.A., by: Brent Sterling, Fayetteville, for appellant. The Bassett Law Firm, by: Dale W. Brown, Fayetteville, for appellee. RITA GRUBER, Judge
DATE: 03/13/2017 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:23:09 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 08312016 GROUP 2, REINST FEE ASSESSED ________________________________________________________
Delaney v. Rapid Response, Inc.public domain
ORDER JEFFREY L. VIKEN, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs John Delaney, guardian ad li-tem and special limited conservator of Andy R. Davis, a protected person, Shannon Humann Davis, individually, and as guardian ad litem of KKD, minor child, and Destyn Humann (hereinafter all plaintiffs are referenced collectively as “Mr. Davis”) bring this diversity action alleging negligence caus
Keshawn Patterson v. Tacarra Charlespublic domain
KESHAWN PATTERSON * NO. 2019-CA-0333 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL TACARRA CHARLES * FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIV
State v. Belmonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Belmon, 2025-Ohio-4400.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. L-23-1296 Appellee Trial Court No. CR0202301156 v. Cedrick Belmon, Jr. DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant Decided: S
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2020 WY 126 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2020 September 28, 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF MICHAEL VINSON: TATA CHEMICALS SODA ASH PARTNERS, LTD, Appellant (Respondent), S-19-0086, S-20-0038 v. MICHAEL
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1329 MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WESTERN POCAHONTAS PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Parcel ID No. 6-5F-1 (Terminated: 1/11/2018), 1-31-10, 1-30-8, 5-26-2, Defendant - Appellant, and D. LANE MCMILLION, Parcel I
Great Lakes Ins. SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co.public domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 601 U. S. Part 1 Pages 65–86 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT February 21, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are req
Alphin v. STATE EX REL. DIVISIONpublic domain
228 P.3d 61 (2010) 2010 WY 39 Joshua Todd ALPHIN, Appellant (Petitioner), v. STATE of Wyoming, ex rel., WYOMING WORKERS' SAFETY AND COMPENSATION DIVISION, Appellee (Respondent). No. S-09-0085. Supreme Court of Wyoming. April 1, 2010. *63 Representing Appellant: Donna D. Domonkos, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Marotta Gund Budd & Dzera LLC v. Costapublic domain
340 B.R. 661 (2006) MAROTTA GUND BUDD & DZERA LLC and J. Richard Budd, III v. Pat V. COSTA and Robert H. Walker. Civ. No. 05-CV-452-JD. United States District Court, D. New Hampshire. March 31, 2006. *662 David M. Kohane, Jeffrey Milton Traurig, Michael D. Sirota, Cole Schotz Meisel Forman & Leonard PA (NJ), Hackensack, N
Bogdanski v. Budzikpublic domain
DAVIS, Justice. [¶1] Mariusz Bogdanski and Damian Bud-zik were codrivers. of a commercial semi-truck that was involved in an accident on Interstate 80. east of Evanston, Wyoming. Bogdanski was injured in the accident and filed an action against Budzik, alleging that his negligence caused the accident. He also sued FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (FedEx), the company whose trailers they were haul
Irvin v. Statepublic domain
49 S.W.3d 635 (2001) 345 Ark. 541 Frankie IRVIN v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CR 00-1086. Supreme Court of Arkansas. July 9, 2001. *637 J. Eric Hagler, P.A., by J. Eric Hagler, Bentonville, for appellant. Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by Misty Wilson Borkowski, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
United States v. Mandelpublic domain
437 F.Supp. 258 (1977) UNITED STATES of America v. Marvin MANDEL, W. Dale Hess, Harry W. Rodgers, III, William A. Rodgers, Irvin Kovens and Ernest N. Cory. Cr. No. 75-0822. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 24, 1977. *259 Barnet D. Skolnik, Ron Liebman, Daniel Hurson, Baltimore, Md., Asst. U.S. Attys., for the Gover
239 F.3d 456 (2nd Cir. 2001) MARK ABDU BRISSON, RONALD H. BUCHNER, GORDON BURGESS, ROBERT BURKE, THOMAS D. CALLAHAN, THOMAS F. CAREY, DALE E. CARMAN, LOUIS CARRARA, T. BARRY CASEY, LAMAR CASON, ROBERT T. CASSIDY, ROBERT CHANGERY, LARRY E. CHAPPEL, RICHARD CHARBONNEAU, STANLEY CHECKOWAY, DOUGLAS S. CHRISTENSEN, LEE J. CHURCH, JAMES CIRILLI, ROBERT CLACK, WALTER M. CLARK, PHILIP CLAUDY, HAROLD T. CLEAVER, CHARLES CLEMENTS, RICHARD T. CLOUGH, LAWRENCE