Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “RONALD W. HARP”
386 F.2d 995 CONTINENTAL/MOSS-GORDIN, INC., Appellant,v.Ronald W. HARP, Joe I. Tarica and Kelley G. Laminack, Appellees. No. 24375. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. December 4, 1967. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama; Frank M. Johnson, Jr. J., 259 F. Supp.
Harp Group, Inc. v. Leinspublic domain
PER CURIAM. The appellee’s motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction below was granted without an evidentiary hearing on the ground that the court lacked “jurisdiction.” This was clearly erroneous since the court possessed both subject matter jurisdiction of a proceeding for injunction, see Sirgany Int’l, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County, 887 So.2d 381, 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), and personal jurisdiction over the defendant-a
State v. Harp, 07ca848 (7-23-2008)public domain
DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} After an Adams County jury found Mark A. Harp guilty of one count of felonious assault, the trial court sentenced him to five years in prison. According to the testimony of John Bays, the victim, Harp started the fight by attacking Bays with a broken pocketknife. However, Harp testified that he fought Bays in self-defense after Bays threatened to shoot him and kicked him in the groin.
Continental/Moss-Gordin, Inc. v. Harppublic domain
PER CURIAM: The opinion and judgment of the district court are obviously correct under the authority of Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Wirtz, 5 Cir. 1967, 381 F.2d 653. Affirmed.
Harp v. Continental/Moss-Gordin Gin Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHNSON, Chief Judge. These cases, having been consolidated pursuant to Rule 42(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, are now submitted upon the pleadings, the stipulations of the parties and the exhibits thereto, depositions, testimony taken orally before the Court and the exhibits thereto, and the briefs of the parties. Upon this submission this Court now, in this memorandum opinion, proc
Ronald Wolfe, Jr. v. Allan Perrypublic domain
OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. In these two appeals, Plaintiff-Appellant Ronald Wolfe, Jr. (“Junior”) challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendanb-Appellee, Detective Alan Perry (“Perry”) as well as the district court’s award of attorney fees to Defendants-Appellees Perry, Sheriffs Deputy Ivan Deering (“Deering”), and As
Hartley v. Agnes Scott Collegepublic domain
NAHMIAS, Justice. We granted certiorari to decide whether a campus police officer employed by a private college qualifies as a “state officer or employee” who may assert immunity from tort suits under the Georgia Tort Claims Act (GTCA), OCGA §§ 50-21-20 to 50-21-37. In Division 1 of Agnes Scott College v. Hartley, 321 Ga. App. 74 (741 SE2d 199) (2013), a thre
PER CURIAM. After a state jury trial the petitioner, Stewart W. Newsom, was convicted of murder and sentenced to imprisonment in the Virginia State Penitentiary. State remedies having been fully exhausted, Newsom sought federal habeas corpus. He alleged that he was deprived of his constitutional rights by being d
Alice v. Ronaldpublic domain
683 S.W.2d 307 (1984) ALICE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RONALD, Defendant-Respondent. No. 13601. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Three. December 19, 1984. *308 James E. Reeves, Ward & Reeves, Caruthersville, for plaintiffs-appellants. John R. Fowlkes, Caruthersville, Jimmy D. Collins, Memp
Al Who Enterprises, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.public domain
217 Ga. App. 423 (1995) AL WHO ENTERPRISES, INC. et al. v. CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION. A95A0700. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided May 10, 1995. Self, Mullins, Robinson, Marchetti & Kamensky, Ronald W. Self, M. Peterson Robinson, for appellants. Warren S. Shulman, Harp & Johnson, Gary L. Johnson, Goodman, McGuffey, Aust & Lindsey,
United States v. Ronald Glen Shawpublic domain
JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. Ronald Glen Shaw was convicted by a jury of five federal offenses: (1) receiving a firearm after earlier being convicted of the felony of rape and assault with intent to rape, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(h); (2) first degree murder of Terrell Johnson, Jr., in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111; (3) carrying a firearm unlawfully and using it to ki
King v. Commonwealthpublic domain
KELLER, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART: I concur in the majority's opinion in part, but dissent from the majority's analysis of the alleged unanimity error. I dissent from this portion of the opinion for two reasons: (1) I believe this case, once again, delves further into a court-made *366con
Filed 8/29/16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE et al., ) ) Plaintiffs and Respondents, ) ) S214855 v. ) ) Ct.App. 2/1 B237153 COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATES, ) ) Los Angeles County
OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum. Respondent, Long Island Airports Limousine Service (LIALS), and appellant, the City of New York (City), in 1968 entered into a contract whereunder the City granted LIALS a 10-year franchise to operate a transportation service between the New York airports and points east. Section 4.7 of the contract provided that: “In the event the Company continues the operation of the authorized rou
Hamilton v. Gregory Truckingpublic domain
205 S.W.3d 181 (2005) Henry HAMILTON, Appellant v. GREGORY TRUCKING and Houston General Insurance Company, Appellees. No. CA 04-861. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II. March 16, 2005. *182 Walker, Shock, Cox & Harp, PLLC, by: Eddie H. Walker, Jr., Fort Smith, for appellant. Ledbetter, Cogbill, Arnold & Harr
Baldwin v. City of Winston-Salempublic domain
544 F.Supp. 123 (1982) Floyd C. and Ruby S. BALDWIN, William Edward Kirby, Jr. and Brenda Head Kirby, Richard B. and Frances S. Charles, Plaintiffs, and Raymond and Dorothy Wigley, Intervenors, v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, Mayor Wayne A. Corpening, Vivian H. Burke, Marilyn S. Harpe, Larry D. Little, Virginia K. Newell, Robert S. Northington, Jr., Ernestine Wilson, Larry W. Womble and Martha S. Wood, Defendants. No. C-81
People v. Bulgerpublic domain
614 N.W.2d 103 (2000) 462 Mich. 495 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory R. BULGER, Defendant-Appellant. Docket No. 112694, Calendar No. 9. Supreme Court of Michigan. Argued October 14, 1999. Decided July 18, 2000. *104 Jennifer M. Granholm, Attorney General, Tho
Blowe v. Peytonpublic domain
208 Va. 68 (1967) RONALD LEE BLOWE v. C. C. PEYTON Record No. 6431. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 12, 1967. Present, All the Justices. 1. Petitioner convicted grand larceny Aug. 18, 1955. While serving sentence on this conviction petitioner again convicted of grand larceny on March 23, 1956. While serving sentence on March 23, 1956 conviction petitioner,
312 S.E.2d 517 (1984) FORSYTH CITIZENS OPPOSING ANNEXATION, Henry Brewer, Robert M. Burcham, Philip Demarko, Joy M. McNab, Gladys Norman, Sam Pope, James A. Sneed, Cornelius F. Spach, Ray W. Sizemore and R.J. Ball v. CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, a Municipal Corporation, and Mayor Wayne A. Corpening, in his Official Capacity, and Vivian H. Burke, Marily S. Harpe, Larry D. Little, Virginia K. Newell, Robert S. Northington, Jr., Ernestine Wilson, Larry W.
Braun and Braunpublic domain
778 Argued and submitted December 13, 2019, reversed and remanded March 11, 2020 In the Matter of the Marriage of Rhonda Darlene BRAUN, Petitioner-Respondent, and Lavelle Herman BRAUN, Respondent-Appellant. Umatilla County Circuit Court