Cases

Per Curiam. *195 {¶ 1} At issue is appellant’s, Arthur R. Heber’s, eligibility for permanent total disability (“PTD”) compensation. Heber was a long-time employee of appellee, Cinergy Corporation/Duke Energy. In 1970, he was injured. Nineteen years later, he

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 10, 2024 Decided July 9, 2024 No. 21-1272 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT EDGECOMBE SOLAR LLC, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 22-1072, 22-1284, 22-1327

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 10, 2024 Decided July 9, 2024 No. 21-1272 DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, RESPONDENT EDGECOMBE SOLAR LLC, INTERVENOR Consolidated with 22-1072, 22-1284, 22-1327

Crothers, Justice. [¶ 1] Statoil Oil & Gas LP appeals from judgments dismissing without prejudice its actions against numerous defendants, seeking a determination of the proper distribution of oil and gas revenues from Williams and McKenzie County wells on land adjacent to the Missouri River and under Lake Sakakawea. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the actions because Stato

301 F.Supp.2d 454 (2004) Heather Sue MERCER, Plaintiff, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. 1:97 CV 00959. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. January 22, 2004. *455 Martha Melinda Lawrence, Burton Craige, Patterson, Harkavy & Lawrence, Raleigh, NC, for plaintiff. John M. Simpson, Michelle C. Pardo, Carol

APPEL, Justice (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part from the majority/plurality opinion. In my view, only the instruction related to material adverse action in connection with plaintiffs retaliation claim is flawed. I find the district court properly instructed the jury on all other issues in this case.

Filed 6/16/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 148 Statoil Oil & Gas LP, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Abaco Energy, LLC; American H

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 Amended August 25, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COU

PER CURIAM. This case involves challenges to the most recent reforms of electric transmission planning and cost allocation adopted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 791 a et seq. In Order No. 1000, as reaffirmed and clarified in Order Nos. 1000-A and 1000-B (together, “the Final Rule”), the Commission requi

PARIENTE, J., dissenting. Let the pro-solar energy consumers beware. Masquerading as a pro-solar energy initiative, this proposed constitutional amendment, supported by some of Florida’s major investor-owned electric utility companies, actually seeks to constitutionalize the status quo.1 The ballot title is *835affirmatively

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge. Any “major emitting facility” built or substantially modified after August 7, 1977, in parts of the country subject to the rules about prevention of significant deterioration (PSD), needs a permit. 42 U.S.C. § 7475(a). This construction permit is in addition to the operating permits that many facilities require under the Clean Air Act and the need to co

11/17/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE June 3, 2020 Session DONNA COOPER ET AL. V. DR. MASON WESLEY MANDY ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County No. 2018-191 James G. Martin, III, Judge No. M2019-01748-COA

Case: 19-12443 Date Filed: 05/05/2020 Page: 1 of 20 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-12443 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cv-00105-LGW-BWC ORASAMA ANDREWS,

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. BROWN, Circuit Judge: The National Chicken Council, National Meat Association, and National Turkey Federation petition for review of EPA’s interpretation of a provision in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (“EISA”). Because the petitioners fail to show that a favorable ruling would redress t

Case: 19-12443 Date Filed: 05/05/2020 Page: 1 of 20 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-12443 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:17-cv-00105-LGW-BWC ORASAMA ANDREWS,

(2008) APPALACHIAN VOICES et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel BODMAN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Energy et al., Defendants. Civil Action No.: 08-0380 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 10, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING AS MOOT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE PLAINTIF

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CLEVELAND INTEGRITY ) SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware ) Limited Liability Company, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2024-0371-MTZ ) RANDY BYERS, )

LYNCH, Chief Judge. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. takes this interlocutory appeal from an order granting the plaintiffs’ motion to remand a putative class action for wage and hour violations. In this case of first impression in this circuit, we clarify the removal time periods and mechanisms under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (“CAFA”). Under CAFA, federal cour

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; APPOINTING CLASS REPRESENTATIVE; AND APPOINTING CLASS COUNSEL GONZALO P. CURIEL, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Art Cohen’s Motion for Class Certification, Appointment of Class Representative, and Appointment of Class Counsel. (Dkt. No. 39.) Plaintiffs proposed Class consists of: [A]ll persons who purchased