Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rafael Rios”
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL VIII VÍCTOR RAFAEL RÍOS Certiorari, RÍOS procedente del Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Parte Recurrida Sala Superior de San Juan KLCE20
Santiago Rios, Rafael v. Lt Autos, LLCpublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL II RAFAEL SANTIAGO RÍOS Revisión procedente del Recurrida Departamento de Asuntos del v. Consumidor (DACo) LT AUTOS LLC H/N/C KLRA202400535 TOYOTA MONUMENTAL
Santiago Rios, Rafael v. Lt Autos, LLCpublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL II RAFAEL SANTIAGO RÍOS Revisión procedente del Recurrida Departamento de Asuntos del v. Consumidor (DACo) LT AUTOS LLC H/N/C KLRA202400535 TOYOTA MONUMENTAL
Santiago Rios, Rafael v. Lt Autos, LLCpublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL II RAFAEL SANTIAGO RÍOS Revisión procedente del Recurrida Departamento de Asuntos del v. Consumidor (DACo) LT AUTOS LLC H/N/C KLRA202400535 TOYOTA MONUMENTAL
Santiago Rios, Rafael v. Lt Autos, LLCpublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL RAFAEL SANTIAGO RÍOS Revisión procedente del Recurrido Departamento de Asuntos del v. Consumidor (DACo) LT AUTOS LLC H/N/C KLRA202500205 TOYO
Santiago Rios, Rafael v. Lt Autos, LLCpublic domain
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL RAFAEL SANTIAGO RÍOS Revisión procedente del Recurrido Departamento de Asuntos del v. Consumidor (DACo) LT AUTOS LLC H/N/C KLRA202500205 TOYO
United States v. Rafael Marroquinpublic domain
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: Rafael Rios Marroquin pleaded guilty to illegal reentry. He was sentenced within the 21 to 27 months Guidelines range to 25 months in prison. That range was based on a criminal history category of V, which applies to the 11 criminal history points assigned to Marroquin. Two of those points were for a North Carolina conviction for
United States v. Rafael Marroquinpublic domain
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: The opinion previously issued in this case is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place: Rafael Rios Marroquin pleaded guilty to illegal reentry. He was sentenced within the 21 to 27 months Guidelines range to 25 months in prison. That range was based on a criminal history category of V, which applies to the 11 cr
United States v. Rafael Marroquinpublic domain
PER CURIAM: The Court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular *303 service and not disqualified not having voted in favor ( Fed. R. Ap. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35 ), rehearing en banc is DENIED. In the en banc poll, three ju
State v. Riospublic domain
OPINION BROWN, Judge. ¶ 1 Rafael Rios, Jr. challenges his felony murder conviction, arguing that the trial court committed reversible error by instructing the jury that Rios could be convicted as an accomplice even if he was not present at the scene of the crime. Rios further contends that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that he could be liable for felony murder only if he was “both an ac
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RAFAEL QUIROZ and CELINA RIOS, Appellants, v. TOWER HILL SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D14-1295 [November 25, 2015] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward C
Rafael G. Rios v. Gordon H. Mansfieldpublic domain
On Remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit KASOLD, Judge: In Rios v. Nicholson, 490 F.3d 928, 931-32 (Fed.Cir.2007), the Federal Circuit held that the common law mailbox rule applies to the filing of a Notice of Appeal (NOA) with this Court, and remanded this matter for application thereof.
Opinion issued November 6, 2003 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ____________
Rios v. Municipality of Guaynabopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are the defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Dockets # 169 & 172), the plaintiffs oppositions thereto (Dockets # 197 & 210), and the parties’ respective replies (Dockets #220 & 238). After reviewing the filings and the applicable law, the motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Fa
Rios v. Nicholsonpublic domain
MICHEL, Chief Judge. Petitioner Rafael G. Rios appeals from an en banc decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) dismissing Mr. Rios’s appeal on the ground that his Notice of Appeal was not timely filed under 38 U.S.C. § 7266(c). Rios v. Nicholson, 20 Vet.App. 104 (2006) (en banc). Because the Veterans Court erred by preclud
Colon-Marrero v. Mundos-Riospublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________________ No. 12-2328 MYRNA COLON-MARRERO; JOSEFINA ROMAGUERA AGRAIT Plaintiffs - Appellees v. EDWIN MUNDO-RIOS, as Electoral Commissioner of the New Progressive Party (NPP) Defendant - Appellant EDER E. ORTI
United States v. Mejia, Rafaelpublic domain
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. GARLAND, Circuit Judge. Following a jury trial, defendants Rafael Mejia and Homes Valencia Rios were convicted of conspiring to distribute cocaine with the knowledge and intent that it would be unlawfully imported into the United States. Mejia was sentenced to 400 months in prison and Rios to 324 mont
Rios De Perez v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Nora Magdalena Rios de Perez seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order upholding an immigration judge’s order denying Rios de Perez’s application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. *481We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that Rios de
Rios-Collins v. Nicholsonpublic domain
On Appeal from the Board of Veterans’ Appeals GREENE, Chief Judge: Before the Court is the question whether, under 38 U.S.C. § 7266(c) Rafael G. Rios and Johnnie Collins timely filed Notices of Appeal (NOAs). The Court received briefs from the parties and amicus curiae, and a panel of three judges of the Court heard oral argument in these cases on June 16, 2005. Pursuant to the Court’s Internal Operating
People v. Riospublic domain
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.), rendered October 8, 1987, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentencing him to concur*373rent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed. Defendant’s claim t