⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ramirez v. Cooke”

Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-12-28 · Published · cited 0× · 210 So. 3d 521; 16 La.App. 3 Cir. 325; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 2399
Cooks, J., dissenting. | defendant and four other men lived in the same household as the alleged victim and her younger sister. They were all Guatemalans working in the U.S. The victim’s mother was in Guatemala and was not permitted to return to the U.S. after visiting her native land with her other children. The victim was left in the care of Defendant’s nephew, the mother’s boyfriend. She alleged Def
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009-06-22 · Published · cited 7× · 14 So. 3d 1192; 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8626; 2009 WL 1741370
KAHN, J. Appellant Barbara Cooke seeks review of an adverse final summary judgment dismissing a suit arising from the death of her husband, Gary Cooke. The claim here involves multiple vehicles and two accidents that occurred on a stretch of southbound Interstate 75 in Alachua County. We reverse because the negligence, if any, of appellant’s decedent was not an intervening and superseding cause acting to break the chain of
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001-03-12 · Published · cited 29× · 18 P.3d 822; 2000 WL 1159085
18 P.3d 822 (2000) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Julio A. RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. No. 99CA0455. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. V. August 17, 2000. Rehearing Denied October 12, 2000. Certiorari Granted March 12, 2001. *825
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-12-29 · Published · cited 5× · 252 N.E.3d 291; 2023 IL App (1st) 221227
2023 IL App (1st) 221227 SIXTH DIVISION December 29, 2023 No. 1-22-1227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
District Court, E.D. New York · 2001-12-04 · Published · cited 3× · 185 F. Supp. 2d 246; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19872; 2001 WL 1629913
185 F.Supp.2d 246 (2001) Marc RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. No. CV 97-2608(ADS). United States District Court, E.D. New York. November 5, 2001. Memorandum Granting Rehearing in Part December 4, 2001. *247 *248 Marc Ramirez, White Deer, PA, Petit
Ramirez v. Carobenepublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-01-16 · Published · cited 2× · 2025 IL App (1st) 240203
2025 IL App (1st) 240203 FOURTH DIVISION Order filed: January 16, 2025 No. 1-24-0203 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT JOSE RAMIR
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Illinois Supreme Court · 2023-05-18 · Published · cited 48× · 468 Ill. Dec. 281; 220 N.E.3d 1060; 2023 IL 128123
2023 IL 128123 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 128123) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. ANDREW RAMIREZ, Appellant. Opinion filed May 18, 2023. CHIEF JU
Ramirez v. Ramirezpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013-08-27 · Published · cited 9× · 124 So. 3d 8; 13 La.App. 5 Cir. 166; 2013 WL 4525701; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 1716
FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge. | ?Elba Esperanza Ramirez (“Elba”), appeals the trial court’s November 26, 2012 judgment granting her sister, Reyna Ramirez (“Reyna”), the sole custody, care, and control of Elba’s minor child, Carlos Enrique Ramirez (“Carlos”). Elba argues the trial court erred in this judgment because: it did not consider whether the custody award to Reyna would result in substantial harm to the minor child;
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2024-02-29 · Published · cited 0×
This opinion is subject to revision before publication. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Anthony R. RAMIREZ, Major United States Army, Appellant No. 23-0080 Crim. App. No. 20210376 Argued October 24, 2023—Decided February 29, 2024 Military Judge: J. Harpe
California Supreme Court · 2024-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA ANGELICA RAMIREZ, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant and Appellant. S273802 Second Appellate District, Division Four B309408 Los Angeles County Superior Court 20STCV25987 July 15, 2024 Ju
Texas Supreme Court · 2022-02-11 · Published · cited 0×
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 20-0354 ══════════ CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp., Petitioner, v. Fernando Ramirez and Minerva Ramirez, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019-07-17 · Published · cited 8× · 2018 IL App (1st) 152125
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993-03-25 · Published · cited 0× · 242 Ill. App. 3d 954; 613 N.E.2d 1230; 184 Ill. Dec. 638; 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 384
JUSTICE COOK, dissenting: I respectfully dissent, for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in People v. Lemons (1993), 242 Ill. App. 3d 941, 949. In Lemons the majority held the petition was not specific enough and was not supported by affidavits. The petition here is specific, and supported by affidavits, but is still rejected. I would be willing to support a summar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-03-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 01312
Matter of Ramirez v Colon (2024 NY Slip Op 01312) Matter of Ramirez v Colon 2024 NY Slip Op 01312 Decided on March 13, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 4
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018-04-30 · Published · cited 1× · 2017 IL App (1st) 130022-B
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Ramirez v. Youngpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-10-09 · Published · cited 177× · 906 F.3d 530
Wood, Chief Judge. *533Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), "[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner ... until such
Ramirez, Elizabethpublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-84,700-01 & WR-84,700-02 EX PARTE KRISTIE MAYHUGH, Applicant ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 1995CR1255A-W1 & 1995CR1256A-W1 IN THE 175 TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY NO. WR-84,701-01 EX PARTE ELIZABETH RAMIREZ, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1995CR1256B-W1 TH IN THE 175 DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY
People v. Ramirezpublic domain
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2018-09-06 · Published · cited 6× · 2018 COA 129
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2025-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-23-00253-CV ________________ CLINTON COOKE, Appellant V. MONTGOMERY COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT NO. 8, Appellee ________________________
Terrazas v. Ramirezpublic domain
Texas Supreme Court · 1991-12-17 · Published · cited 175× · 829 S.W.2d 712; 35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 256; 1991 Tex. LEXIS 160; 1991 WL 269035
MAUZY, Justice, dissenting. A three-ring circus is underway: in the near ring, a majority of this court doing a sidestepping act; in the far ring, President Bush’s Department of Justice doing a juggling act; and in the center ring, three appointed federal judges taming the legislative lion. Unfortunately, the people of Texas are being had, not entertained. In this latest development, the majority wants to swee