Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ramon Vaughan”
Ramon A. Mercado v. City of Orlandopublic domain
SILER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Ramon A. Mercado appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants City of Orlando (“Orlando”), and police officers Ramfis Padilla and Christina Rouse on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for the use of excessive force when detaining him and preventing him from committing suicide. 1
MEMORANDUM ORDER REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the Defendants’ Motion to Amend Order to Allow Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (“Motion to Amend Order”), and corresponding Brief in Support, both filed on February 12, 2016. ECF Nos. 134, 135. The Relator filed its Brief in Opposition on February 23, 2016. ECF No. 136. Further
CI International Fuels, Ltda. v. Helm Bank, S.A.public domain
707 F.Supp.2d 1351 (2010) CI INTERNATIONAL FUELS, LTDA., et al., Plaintiffs, v. HELM BANK, S.A., et al., Defendants. Case No. 10-20347-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. April 26, 2010. Gonzalo Ramon Dorta, Gonzalo R. Dorta, P.A., Ibrahim Reyes-Gandara, Silva & Silva, Coral Gables, FL, for CI International Fuels, Ltda. and Internati
898 F.2d 312 1990 A.M.C. 1290 Ramon RODRIGUEZ ALVAREZ, Appellee,v.BAHAMA CRUISE LINE, INCORPORATED, Bermuda Star Line,Incorporated, and S.S. BERMUDA STAR, her engines,boilers, tackle, appurtenances, etc.,Defendants.Appeal of BERMUDA STAR LINE, INCORPORATED, Appellant. No. 753, Docket 89-7881. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit.
Araim v. Painewebber, Inc.public domain
691 F.Supp. 1415 (1988) Hisham ARAIM, Plaintiff, v. PAINEWEBBER, INC.; Andrew Cinman; Melvin Davidson, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 1:88-CV-73-JOF. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. June 22, 1988. *1416 William R. Asbell, Jr., Lewis Ramon Lamb, Hishon & Ranney, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff. Steve
Zervos v. Vargaspublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated October 3, 2012, which granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to transfer venue of this action from Kangs County to Queens County and, in effect, denied their motion to transfer venue of this action from Kings County to Nassau County. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs,
Zervos v. Vargaspublic domain
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated October 3, 2012, which granted the plaintiff’s cross motion to transfer venue of this action from Kangs County to Queens County and, in effect, denied their motion to transfer venue of this action from Kings County to Nassau County. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs,
California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Boardpublic domain
161 Cal.App.3d 393 (1984) 207 Cal. Rptr. 659 CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. GOVERNING BOARD OF THE SIMI VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. B003195. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six. October 30, 1984. *396
Roberto Escamilla v. Ricardo Cadenapublic domain
NUMBER 13-22-00041-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ROBERTO ESCAMILLA, Appellant, v. RICARDO CADENA, Appellee. On appeal from the 93rd District Court
Ludewig v. Houston Pipeline Co.public domain
This is a condemnation action. After preliminary negotiations failed, appellee Houston Pipeline Co. (HPL), filed its original Statement and Petition in Condemnation in which it sought to acquire a 50-foot wide pipeline easement through appellants' (Ludewigs') property. A description of the easement sought and a plat were attached to the original statement and petition. Three special commissioners conducted a hearing and awarded appellants the sum of $25,000.00. Appellants rejected the
GEORGE GOMEZ v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., etc.public domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 25, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-622 Lower Tribunal No. 08-109 ________________ George Gomez, Silvia Pohl, and Joy Gomez, Appellants,
People v. Abreupublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), rendered November 19, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The trial court properly precluded a defense witness from testifying about collateral matters intended merely to impeach the credibility of a prosecution witness (see, Peop
People v. Archibaldpublic domain
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), rendered March 24, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed
Sanchez v. Lane Bryant, Inc.public domain
*1240Proceedings: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND DEFENDANT JULIE TSE’S MOTION TO DISMISS Present: The Honorable CHRISTINA A. SNYDER, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION On April 29, 2015, plaintiff Brenda Sanchez (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against defendants Lane Bryant, Inc. (“Lane Bryant”),
Hyundai Motor Co. v. Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguezpublic domain
995 S.W.2d 661 (1999) HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, Hyundai Motor America, Inc., and Port City Pontiac-GMC Trucks, Inc. d/b/a Harbor Hyundai, Petitioners, v. Rowena RODRIGUEZ, by and through her next friend, Andrea RODRIGUEZ, Respondent. No. 97-0648. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 18, 1998. Decided June 10, 1999. *662
Lopez v. Statepublic domain
601 S.E.2d 116 (2004) 267 Ga. App. 532 LOPEZ v. The STATE. Mejia v. The State. Nos. A04A0338, A04A0339. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 21, 2004. *119 David L. Whitman, Lawrenceville, Norman H. Cuadra, Decatur, for appellant. Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Karen M. Harris, William
Cone Brothers Contracting v. Rogerspublic domain
432 So.2d 812 (1983) CONE BROTHERS CONTRACTING and Whiting National Services, Appellants, v. Daniel E. ROGERS (Deceased), and Louise C. Rogers (Claimant), Appellee. No. AP-9. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. June 15, 1983. Nancy L. Cavey of Earle & Thompson, St. Petersburg, for appellants. Ramon Clark Calafell, Jr. of Wagner, Cunningha
United States v. Anthony Caldwellpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-4019 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTHONY LAMONT CALDWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., Distri
United States v. Rosgapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION HENRY E. HUDSON, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on two sets of petitions by non-defendant third parties to amend numerous forfeiture orders previously entered in this case, as well as motions by the United' States to strike those petitions. For the reasons set forth herein, the third-party petitions will be denied, and the Government’s motions will be granted
State of Tennessee v. Dylan Brewerpublic domain
03/11/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON November 6, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DYLAN BREWER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 16-06473 Paula L. Skahan, Judge ___________________________________