Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Randall Thompson and Sharon Thompson”
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
617 N.W.2d 609 (2000) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Wende Borg THOMPSON, Appellant. No. C7-99-2003. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. October 3, 2000. *611 Mike Hatch, Attorney General, and Clayton M. Robinson, Jr., St. Paul City Attorney, John H. Stechmann, Assistant City Attorney, St. Paul, for respondent. John M. Stua
Yiamouyiannis v. Thompsonpublic domain
Case Number: 04-87-00673-CV 09/14/1989 Record returned to Court of Appeals 09/13/1989 Motion for Rehearing - Disposed Overruled 07/05/1989 Motion for Rehearing forwarded 06/27/1989 Motion for Rehearing - Filed 06/21/1989 Application for Writ of Error - Disposed proceeding denied 04/12/1989 Petitioner's reply brief 04/07/1989 Reply filed 03/29/1989 No description available. 03/29/1989 Case forwarded to Court 03/29/1989 Petitioner's reply brief 03/23/1989 Reply filed 03/09/1989 Application for
Sharon Kay Keith v. Randall Dean Keithpublic domain
Opinion issued July 20, 2006
Sharon Kay Keith v. Randall Dean Keithpublic domain
Opinion issued July 20, 2006 In The Court of Appeals
State of Tennessee v. Joey DeWayne Thompsonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 7, 2009 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOEY DEWAYNE THOMPSON Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Knox County No. 73384 Ray L. Jenkins, Judge No. E2006-02093-SC-R11-CD - Filed May 6, 2009 The defendant
Hanold v. Watson's Orchard Property Owners Ass'npublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court R.C. Frederick Hanold, III and Rose F. Hanold, and Carol R. Mitchell and George P. Mitchell, Jr., Respondents, v. Watson's Orchard Property Owners Association, Inc., a South Carolina Corporation, and Pelham Farm, LLC, a South Carolina Corporation, Legacy One, LLC, a South Carolina Corporation, SESP LLC, a South Carolina Corporation, an unknown Trustee of the Revocable Trust Agreement Dated March 19,1996 established by Jam
Richmond v. Thompsonpublic domain
Johnson, J. — This is a defamation case in which we are asked to decide whether citizen complaints regarding police conduct are absolutely privileged under either the federal and state constitutions or common law. Washington State Patrol Trooper Davis Richmond sued Thompson for defamation on the basis of a letter Thompson sent to the Governor’s Office. In the letter, Thompson alleged Trooper Richmond assaulted him and threatened
Randalls Food and Drugs, Lp v. Sharon Kocurekpublic domain
Reversed and Remanded in Part and Memorandum Opinion filed September 28, 2006 Reversed and Remanded in Part and Memorandum Opinion filed September 28, 2006.
L.M. v. Shelby County Department of Human Resourcespublic domain
THOMAS, Judge. R.G. gave birth to A.C. (“the daughter”) in December 2011. The daughter tested positive for cocaine at birth. K.R., R.G.’s aunt, adopted the daughter at that time. R.G. gave, birth to C.G. (“the son”) in September 2013, and, shortly afterward, the Shelby County Department of Human Resources (“DHR”) received.a report alleging that R.G. had been abusing drugs and neglecting the son,, and, in January 2014, it rec
Thomas v. Torrezpublic domain
362 S.W.3d 669 (2011) Clifton THOMAS, M.D. and Sharon Lambi, P.A., Appellants, v. Aracelly TORREZ, Individually, and as Representative of the Estate of Ricardo Torrez and as Next Friend of Ricardo Isaiah Torrez, Minor Child, Appellee. No. 14-10-00281-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). March 31, 2011. *670 Wallac
Ex Parte Randallpublic domain
Application of the Cranman Rule The main opinion in Ex parte Cranman, 792 So.2d 392,404-05 (Ala. 2000), states as follows: "We cannot, in blind obedience to the doctrine of stare decisis, continue to accept an expansive application of caselaw characterizing as a discretionary function conduct remote from the execution of governmental policy; to do so would perpet
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: A seaman appeals the refusal of the district court to grant his motion, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), seeking relief from the dismissal of his admiralty claims. Finding that the district court acted within its discretion, we affirm its denial of the motion. I.
Randall Shotts v. John Wetzelpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. In 2001, Randall Keith Shotts was sentenced to 30)6 to 133 years’ imprisonment in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania. Following a lengthy state collateral review process, during which Shotts was appointed five different counsel, he filed this petition for habeas corpus. It alleges that his firs
Brooks v. Halepublic domain
Michael S. Brooks and Carole B. Brooks appeal from a judgment of the DeKalb Circuit Court declaring that they owned a nonexclusive easement for the construction and maintenance of a driveway and utilities across a 15-foot-wide strip of land (hereinafter referred to as "the easement parcel") and that the easement parcel was owned in fee simple by Lonnie Hale and Sharon D. Hale. The Brookses claimed that they owned the easement parcel in fee simple and that the Hales owned no interest i
Richmond v. Thompsonpublic domain
922 P.2d 1343 (1996) 130 Wash.2d 368 Davis RICHMOND, Respondent, v. Woodrow THOMPSON and Jane Doe Thompson, whose true Christian name is unknown, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Petitioners. No. 63541-2. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued May 15, 1996. Decided September 26, 1996.
State v. Thompsonpublic domain
507 N.W.2d 253 (1993) 244 Neb. 375 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Frances L. THOMPSON, Appellant. No. S-92-891. Supreme Court of Nebraska. October 22, 1993. *259 Andrew Reid and Bruce Ellison, for appellant. Don Stenberg, Atty. Gen., and Marilyn B. Hutchinson, for appellee. HASTINGS, C.J., B
A.E.C. v. J.R.M.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 483 This is an adoption case in which A.E.C. ("the birth mother") appeals the Jefferson Probate Court's denial of the contest she filed challenging the adoption of A.J.M. ("the child") by J.R.M., Jr., and J.A.M. ("the adoptive parents"). The birth mother's contest and appeal are based, in large part, on her asse
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2007-CA-00532-SCT SHARON PARKER AND ALINE WHISENANT v. HARRISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND WILFRED E. ROSS DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/26/2007 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. LISA P. DODSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS: GEORGE W. BYRNE, JR. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES:
Kallam v. Boydpublic domain
Sharon Boyd sued five health care providers for failing to diagnose her colorectal cancer. The trial court granted partial summary judgment dismissing Boyd's claims of negligence that occurred more than two years before she filed suit as being barred by limitations.1 That judgment became final by severance, and Boyd appealed. The court of appeals reversed in part, concluding that the Open Courts provision of the Texas Constitution
Palisano v. City of Clearwaterpublic domain
219 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2002) Katherine PALISANO, Plaintiff(s), v. CITY OF CLEARWATER, James Wood, individually and Donald Brown, individually, Defendant(s). No. 8:01-CV-2493-T-27MSS. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. August 14, 2002. *1250 *1251 Randall V. Shanafelt, Sha