Cases

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bridgette Neal appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispe

OPINION KIRSCH, Judge. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc., Save the Valley, Inc., Sierra Club, and Valley Watch, Inc. (collectively, “In-tervenors”) appeal the order of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“the Commission”) approving Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.’s (“Duke”) request to include power plant construction costs incurred from October 1, 2011 through March 31, 2012 in a rate adjustment rider

OPINION VAIDIK, Judge. Case Summary On October 5, 2010, Governor Mitch Daniels fired Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (“IURC” or “Commission”) Chairman David Lott Hardy. Hardy was aware that one of his administrative law judges (“ALJ”), Scott R. Storms, had been communicating with Duke Energy Indiana (“Duke”) regarding a pos

193 S.W.3d 167 (2006) Peter J. LEDIG, Appellant, v. DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION and Duke Energy Trading and Marketing, L.L.C., Appellees. No. 01-04-00922-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). March 23, 2006. *171 Gregg M. Rosenberg, Gregg M. Rosenberg & Associates Houston, for Appellant. Robert L. Ivey, Oglet

Opinion issued March 23, 2006 In The Court of Appeals

281 F.Supp.2d 786 (2003) In re DUKE ENERGY ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates To: All Actions No. 3:02CV291-MU. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. June 23, 2003. *787 *788 Geraldine Sumter, Ferguson, Stein, Chambers, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, Charlotte,

499 F.3d 1016 (2007) PORT OF SEATTLE, WASHINGTON, Petitioner, IDACORP Energy; Williams Power Company Inc.; City of Tacoma, Washington; Southern California Edison Company; Constellation Power Source Inc.; El Paso Merchant Energy L.P.; Morgan Stanley Capital Group, Inc.; Tractebel Energy Marketing Inc.; BP Energy Co., Intervenors, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent, M-S-R Public Power Agency; Duke Energy Trading and Marketi

413 F.Supp.2d 601 (2006) John M.J. MADEY, Plaintiff, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. No. 1:97CV01170. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. January 31, 2006. *602 *603 James Lee Lester, Maccord Mason PLLC, Greensboro, NC, Randall M. Roden, Tharrington Smith, Raleigh, NC, for Plaint

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT HEATHER SUE MERCER,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellant,  No. 04-1191 and FRED GOLDSMITH, Defendant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: JEROME E. POLK Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.: Polk & Associates JON B. LARAMORE Davie, Florida JANE DALL WILSON Faegre Baker Daniels LLP Sep 08 2014, 9:03 am Indianapolis, Indiana JENNIFER A. WASHBURN Citizens Action Coalition of Indi

Recurrent Energy Dev. Holdings, LLC v. SunEnergy1, LLC, 2018 NCBC 59. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 16 CVS 15107 RECURRENT ENERGY DEVELOPMENT HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, ORDER AND OPINION ON CROSS- v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMA

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. # 869) PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Presently before this Court is Defendant Reliant Energy, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Doc. # 869),1 filed on March 3, 2008. Plaintiffs filed an Opposition (Doc. # 1103) and supporting declaration (Doc. # 1104) on June

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge TRAXLER wrote the opinion, in which Judge LUTTIG and Judge KING joined. OPINION TRAXLER, Circuit Judge. Duke University appeals from the district court’s order awarding Heather Sue Mercer almost $350,000 in attorney’s fees in her Title IX action against Duke. Duke contends that because Mercer’

PER CURIAM. This case involves challenges to the most recent reforms of electric transmission planning and cost allocation adopted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 791 a et seq. In Order No. 1000, as reaffirmed and clarified in Order Nos. 1000-A and 1000-B (together, “the Final Rule”), the Commission requi

NUMBER 13-05-00609-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

374 F.Supp.2d 1172 (2005) Randal TART, Plaintiff, v. IMV ENERGY SYSTEMS OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant. No. 1:03 CV 1479 WSD. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 31, 2005. *1173 *1174 Gary Richard Kessler, Irvin Stanford & Kessler, Atlanta, GA, for plaintiff.</

460 B.R. 360 (2011) In re MAGNESIUM CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al., Debtors. Lee E. Buchwald, Chapter 7 Trustee of the estates of Magnesium Corporation of America and Renco Metals, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Williams Energy Marketing & Trading Co., f/k/a Barrett Resources Corp., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 01-14312 (REG). Adversary No. 04-02656 (REG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York.</

MIKVA, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Appellant Randall would, I am convinced, have obtained the status adjustment she seeks but for a government official’s unconstitutional action. The record indicates that the district director ruled that she was statutorily eligible for a status adjustment, but decided that he would not grant it because he disapproved of her writings and associations. The majority holds that Ran

Justice MEYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. This is an appeal from an order of the North Carolina Utilities Commission in a general rate case. Numerous questions concerning the legality of the order have been raised by appellant intervenors and will be treated seriatim. Procedurally, the case comes to this Court as follows: On 15 February 1985, Duke Power Company filed an application with the North Carolina Utilities Commission seeking to inc

ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS