Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Randle v. Alexander”
Randle v. Alexanderpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge Plaintiff El’Reko D’Wayne Randle filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Randle alleges that prison officials violated the Eighth Amendment by forcing him to fight and ultimately kill another prisoner while they watched. He also alleges Eighth Amendment violations related to a two-year period of solitary confinement. In three separate motions, Defendants
Randle v. Alexanderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This civil rights case, brought by Plaintiff El’Reko D’Wyane Randle pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against a number of prison officials, arises from serious allegations of abuse and neglect within the prison system. Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Third Amended Verified Complaint (“TAC”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil
RANDLE v. CITY OF TULSApublic domain
OSCN Found Document:RANDLE v. CITY OF TULSA Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case Print Only
Southmont Development Co. v. Randlepublic domain
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant after a nonjury trial. On April 7, 1980, Southmont Development Company, Inc. ("Southmont"), entered into a lease with the defendant, Roy Randle, regarding the rental of commercial space at a shopping center that had been recently acquired by Southmont. Randle owned and operated the Rocky Ridge Pharmacy, which had been located at the shopping center for several years prior to the 1980 lease. The lease referr
Alexander v. Alexanderpublic domain
PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge | Nlie subject of this appeal is a parcel of property in Jefferson County. The parties to this dispute are siblings. Appellants Avery Alexander and Carolyn Vassal- 1 contend that the Jefferson County Circuit Court erred in reforming a deed to a portion of the property;
State v. Alexanderpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Alexander, 2023-Ohio-3450.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 30053 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JEREMIAH LAMAR ALEXANDER
Holloway v. Alexanderpublic domain
FAGG, Circuit Judge. Winston Holloway, an Arkansas prisoner, brought this civil rights action against various employees of the Arkansas Department of Correction (the appellees), asserting the living conditions in the punitive isolation area of the state’s maximum security prison violated his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. A jury found in favor of the appellees. Holloway appeals and we af
Whalen v. Randlepublic domain
OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. This action stems from a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 that was filed outside of the one-year statute of limitations established under § 2244(d)(1). Petitioner-Appellant, David M. Whalen, argues that he should not be barred by the one-year statute of limitations because of tolling during his state and federal appeals, tolling after his discove
Winston Holloway v. Coi Larry Alexanderpublic domain
957 F.2d 529 Winston HOLLOWAY, Appellant,v.COI Larry ALEXANDER; Ricky Anthony; Bernard Gardner; RoyHobbs; Mark Anthony Jimmerson; Karl E. Johnson; Wesley W.Mitchell; Randle Morgan; Larry Norris; Unknown Agents(25); Rodney V. Watson, Appellees. No. 91-2178. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 11, 1992.Decided Feb
State of Iowa v. Kole Alexander Higginspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1863 Filed April 1, 2020 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. KOLE ALEXANDER HIGGINS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Greene County, Joseph B. McCarville, District Associate Judge. A defendant appeals five drug-related convictions. REVERSED
People v. Randlepublic domain
661 N.E.2d 370 (1995) 277 Ill. App.3d 788 214 Ill.Dec. 516 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David RANDLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-93-0949. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division. December 29, 1995. Rehearing Denied March 5, 1996.
Lismont v. Alexander Binzel Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LAWRENCE R. LEONARD, United States Magistrate Judge. On March 12, 2014, the Court granted Plaintiffs Motion for a Protective Order, ECF No. 80, and then on May 1, 2014, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(A) (“Rule 37”) directed Plaintiff Hedwig Lismont (“Lismont”) to file “a motion substantiating its costs and fees pursuant to the factors enumerated i
Randle v. Allenpublic domain
862 P.2d 1329 (1993) Stephen R. RANDLE, individually and as guardian for Nathan Randle, Sarah Randle and Spencer Randle, minor children, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Carl Hunter ALLEN, an individual, Utah Department of Transportation, State of Utah, and Salt Lake County, Defendants and Appellee. No. 900189. Supreme Court of Utah. October 8, 1993.
State of Tennessee v. Justin Alexander DeWeesepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 7, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUSTIN ALEXANDER DEWEESE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 17098 Lee Russell, Judge No. M2011-00534-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 28, 2012 Upon a plea of guilty, Defendant, Justin Alexander Deweese, was convicted of c
State of Tennessee v. Joel Adam Alexanderpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs August 18, 2009 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOEL ADAM ALEXANDER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 16250 Robert Crigler, Judge No. M2008-02085-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 23, 2010 Defendant, Joel Adam Alexander, was indicted for possession of more than .5 grams of a
United States v. Alexanderpublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 00-30208 __________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JALTHEUS COOPER, also known as Tweet Cooper, Defendant-Appellant, ________
People v. Alexanderpublic domain
599 N.W.2d 749 (1999) 234 Mich. App. 665 PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Ronald Ramie ALEXANDER, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. Docket No. 207444. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted March 10, 1999, at Lansing. Decided April 2, 1999, at 9:00 a.m. Released for Publication J
Randle v. Mitchellpublic domain
Reversing. Mrs. Mitchell sustained injuries to her right leg and to her back when the automobile in which she was riding, and which was being driven by her husband, collided with a taxicab at the corner of 13th and Park Avenue, in Paducah, shortly after 11 p. m. on the night of April 1, 1937. Thirteenth Street is a boulevard. While Park Avenue is not a boulevard, a signal light had been maintained at this corner prior to the Ohio River flood early in 1937, but was not in operation at t
Alexander v. PSB Lending Corp.public domain
800 N.E.2d 984 (2003) Theodore & Joyce ALEXANDER, Husband and Wife; on behalf of themselves And all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. PSB LENDING CORPORATION, et al., Appellees. No. 82A04-0212-CV-592. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 31, 2003. *986 Daniel Myers, Kevin Oufnac, Richardson Patrick Westbrook & Br
Fowler v. Randlepublic domain
Reversing. This appeal is from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to appellant's petition and dismissing it in an action by her against the appellee for personal injuries alleged to have been received by her by reason of stepping in a hole when about to board appellee's taxicab. The allegations of the petition are in substance that on 8th Street in Paducah appellant signalled to appellee for the purpose of becoming a passenger in his taxicab and that appellee responded to this sig