Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge Plaintiff Ronald Coats brings this action against his former employer, the United States Department of Education, for alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and the Age Discrimination in Employmen

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA DUNCAN; RICHARD LEWIS; No. 19-55376 PATRICK LOVETTE; DAVID MARGUGLIO; CHRISTOPHER D.C. No. WADDELL; CALIFORNIA RIFLE & 3:17-cv-01017- PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., a BEN-JLB California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. ROB BONTA, in his offic

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 69-6-19 Vtec Zlotoff Foundation Inc. NOV (2) DECISION ON MOTIONS This appeal, which is coordinated with a municipal enforcement action (Docket No. 17-2- 20 Vtec), relates to two municipal Notices of Violation (“NOVs”) issued to the Zlotoff Fo

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════════════ Nos. 09-0432, 09-0433, 09-0474, 09-0703 ══════════════════════════════

201 F.3d 482 (D.C. Cir. 2000) Jimmy L. Duncan, Appelleev.Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Appellant No. 99-7073 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 16, 1999Decided January 28, 2000Order Granting Rehearing En Banc and Vacating Judgment March 31, 2000

*484Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS. KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) challenges the district court’s denial of judgment as a matter of law on the claims Jimmy Duncan brought under the Americans with

JUSTICE STAMOS delivered the opinion of the court: On remand, we are again asked to decide whether the trial of defendant, William Duncan, should have been severed from that of his codefendant, Perry Olinger, because testimony about statements by Olinger was admitted although Olinger himself did not testify and thus was not subject to cross-examination regarding the statemen

292 Md. 97 (1981) 437 A.2d 230 IN RE: RANDOLPH T. [No. 25, September Term, 1981.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Decided December 4, 1981. The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and SMITH, DIGGES, ELDRIDGE, COLE, DAVIDSON and RODOWSKY, JJ. Michael R. Malloy, Assistant Public Defender, with whom were Alan H. Murrell, Public Defender

Stayton, Chief Justice.— On April 13, 1885, J. H. Britton & Co., a partnership composed of J. H. Britton, John T. Long, and W. E. Kennedy, recovered a judgment against W. C. Howard for $2700, which on appeal was affirmed on May 29, 1888. An execution issued under that judgment and Howard now seeks to *456restrain its enforcement. Britton died after

31 F.2d 869 (1929) ETTLINGER v. TRUSTEES OF RANDOLPH-MACON COLLEGE. No. 2805. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. April 9, 1929. *870 Robert H. Talley, of Richmond, Va. (Edward F. Eldridge, of Richmond, Va., on the brief), for appellant. A. W. Patterson, of Richmond, Va., and W. C. Armstrong, of Front Royal, Va., for

The Chancellor. The complainants bring this suit as the heirs and distributees of Margaret A. Reed, deceased. The allegations of the bill, so far as the demurrer is concerned, are: , That Mrs. Reed, about the 14th June, 1838, made her last will and testament, appointing the defendants her executors, to whom she devised and bequeathed the most of her estate, consisting in part of a large number of negro slaves;

RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment: I do not join parts III and IV of Judge Brown’s opinion because I do not believe we need to reach the potentially far-reaching corporate free-exercise question. Other courts in contraceptive-mandate cases have “decline[d] to address the unresolved question of whether for-profit corporations can exercise religion.” Tyndal

(2008) John DOE and Jane Doe, as the Natural Parents and Next Friends of Their Minor Child, James Doe, Plaintiffs, v. The WILSON COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM; Dr. Jim Duncan, Individually and as Director of Wilson County Schools; Wendell Marlowe, Principal of the Lakeview Elementary School; Yvonne Smith, Assistant Principal of Lakeview Elementary School; and Janet Adamson, Teacher at Lakeview Elementary School, Defendants. No. 3:06-

524 F.Supp.2d 964 (2007) John DOE and Jane Doe, as the Natural Parents and Next Friends of Their Minor Child, James Doe, Plaintiffs, v. The WILSON COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM; Dr. Jim Duncan, Individually and as Director of Wilson County Schools; Wendell Marlowe, Principal of the Lakeview Elementary School; Yvonne Smith, Assistant Principal of Lakeview Elementary School; and Janet Adamson, Teacher at Lakeview Elementary School, Defendants.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2025-KA-00444-SCT STEPHANIE MICHELLE VANCE v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/27/2025 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK SHELDON DUNCAN TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: TODD WARREN SOREY WALTON WADE WHITE JACOB DANIEL HAMM B

ROGERS, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Like Judge Williams, I would apply the experience and logic analysis of Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court, 478 U.S. 1, 8-9, 106 S.Ct. 2735, 92 L.Ed.2d 1 (1986) (“Press-Enterprise II”), and so my conclusion about when the government’s interest in protecting information classified as SECRET will outweigh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Criminal Action No. 21-107 (RDM) BRUNO JOSEPH CUA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Bruno Joseph Cua is charged with twelve offenses related to the breach of the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. Dkt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAWANZAH CROCKETT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1357 (RDM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Jawanzah Crockett, proceeding pro se, filed suit against the District of Columbia and nine employees of D.

KITCHENS, Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. Dr. Steven Hayne seeks reversal of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of his former medical malpractice insurer, The Doctors Company and The Doctors Company Insurance Services (collectively, “The Doctors”). The Doctors has refused to cover Hayne for lawsuits brought by exonerated criminal defendants