Cases

23-6559-cr(L) United States v. Sullivan, Bilda, Rankin UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ___________________________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: May 13, 2024 Decided: September 6, 2024 Docket Nos. 23-6559, 23-6608, 23-6609, 23-7875, 23-7882, 23-7887, 24-91 ____________

OPINION Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS. The City of Dallas filed these interlocutory appeals from orders denying its pleas to the jurisdiction in four lawsuits filed against the City by current and former police officers, firefighters, and rescue officers (the Officers) alleging that the City breached its contract with them regarding their pay. We consolidated the appeals for the purpose of

801 F.Supp.2d 429 (2011) Lawrence ALEXANDER Jr., Ellis Allen, Mitchell Alston, Frances R. Banks, Ahmed Blake, Michael O. Brodie, Kevin E. Chandler, Charles E. Cherry, Ernest Cuthbertson, Darrin Davis, Steven A. Evans, William Graves, Milford J. Harris Ii, Jonathan Heard, Antuan Hinson, Stephen L. Hunter, Brian James, Demetrius W. Johnson, John O. Legrande, George M. Little, Darrell McDonald, C.L. Melvin, Stacy A. Morton Jr., Willie Parker, Larry Patterso

762 F.Supp.2d 764 (2011) Lawrence ALEXANDER Jr., Ellis Allen, Mitchell Alston, Frances R. Banks, Ahmed Blake, Michael O. Brodie, Kevin E. Chandler, Charles E. Cherry, Ernest Cuthbertson, Darrin Davis, Steven A. Evans, William Graves, Milford J. Harris II, Jonathan Heard, Antuan Hinson, Stephen L. Hunter, Brian James, Demetrius W. Johnson, John O. Legrande, George M. Little, Darrell McDonald, C.L. Melvin, Stacy A. Morton Jr., Willie Parker, Larry Patterso

[Cite as Allen v. Rankin, 2013-Ohio-456.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY SUSAN M. ALLEN, ET AL., : : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : Case No. 12CA10 : vs. : : JOHN A. RANKIN, DBA : DECISION AND JUDGMENT TUSCAN TABLE RE

USCA11 Case: 23-11280 Document: 56-1 Date Filed: 06/11/2025 Page: 1 of 38 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-11280 ____________________ SAMUEL SCOTT, JR.,

PER CURIAM: In this appeal, Plaintiff appeals the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, the City of Atlanta and its police chief, dismissing Plaintiffs § 1983 First Amendment suit. Plaintiff claimed that the chiefs failure to promote her was in retaliation for a comment she posted on Face-book criticizing another law enforcement officer of the department, Investigator Barbara Floyd. P

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. Before the Court are the Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss, or in the Alternative, *574Traditional/No Evidence Rule 56 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants City of Grapevine (the “City”) and Edward Salame, the City’s Chief of Police, and the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment fil

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, in a suit filed therein by respondent, as plaintiff, against appellant, as defendant. The petition was in two counts. The findings on the second count, which sought partion of specific personal property, went for defendant, and plaintiff did not appeal, and so it passes out of the case. The first count of the amended petition, on which the case was tried, alleges in substance, that from December 1, 1925, until o

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This antitrust case requires us to apply the standards announced in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct.

34 S.W.3d 360 (2001) 343 Ark. 317 PRE-PAID SOLUTIONS, INC., and Grady Bowers v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK; Larry Jegley, Pulaski County Prosecuting Attorney; and Randy Johnson, Pulaski County Sheriff. No. 00-794. Supreme Court of Arkansas. January 11, 2001. Dover & Dixon, P. A., by Darrin O'Quinn, Little Rock, for appellant. Mark Pryor,

Action to enjoin the defendants from diverting water from Piney creek in Carbon County, Montana. From a judgment for plaintiffs granting the relief prayed for, defendants appeal. Piney creek rises in or near the Pryor mountains in Carbon County and flows in a westerly direction for about six miles to a point about a mile north of Warren, Carbon County, to a confluence with Sage creek. It has well defined banks and channel, the latter at places 12 to 15 feet deep, with a gravel or stony

* NOTE: Opinion filed at May Term, 1934, June 19, 1934; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled at September Term, December 1, 1934. This case comes to the writer on reassignment. Respondent, plaintiff below, obtained a judgment against appellants, defendants below, in the sum of $8,000 as damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as the result of a fall due to a defective sidewalk on Calhoun Str

Mr. Presiding Judge Smedley delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B. The suit was instituted by defendant in error Pryor against plaintiff in error LeSage, the allegations being that LeSage was engaged in the business of buying and selling automobiles under the name of LeSage Motor Company and that Pryor, while riding in an automobile owned by LeSage and operated by Rollins, an employee of

USCA11 Case: 22-12324 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 10/31/2023 Page: 1 of 29 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12324 ____________________ TYLER LAND,

SMEDLEY, Commissioner. The suit was instituted by defendant in error Pryor against plaintiff in error Le-Sage, the allegations being that LeSage was engaged in the business of buying and selling automobiles under the name of Le-Sage Motor Company and that Pryor, while riding in an automobile owned by LeSage and operated by Rollins, an employee of LeSage, suffered personal injuries caused by Rollins’ negligence. The jury, in

181 Kan. 360 (1957) 311 P.2d 306 THE CITY OF GARDEN CITY, KANSAS, Appellant, v. FREDERICK WILLIS MILLER, Appellee. No. 40,524 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed May 11, 1957. Lloyd H. Haag, City Attorney, of Garden City, argued the cause and was on the briefs for appellant. Logan N. Green, of Garden City, argued the c

Arnold L. Fein, J. At an auction sale conducted by defendant, City of New York, on November 18, 1965, plaintiff was the successful bidder for three vacant lots in The Bronx and made a down payment of $100. There was at the time of the sale and prior thereto a metal fence runnning across two of the lots from an adjoining lot, owned by a third party, neither sold nor purchased in this sale. The memorandum of sale provided that the