Cases

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.1048 II. THE DELAWARE STATUTORY SCHEME.1050 III. CONTENT NEUTRALITY.1053 A. Introduction.1053 B. The Metromedia Plurality.1054 C. Analyzing Plurality Opinions — Doubts Cast by the Metromedia Concurrence and Dis

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-1066-JTL ) HORIZON KINETICS LLC, HORIZON ) KINETICS ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC, ) SOFTVEST ADVISORS,

18 F.3d 1043 Daniel D. RAPPA, Sr.v.NEW CASTLE COUNTY; Dennis E. Greenhouse; Robert W.O'Brien; John C. Carney, Jr.; Mark A.Kleinschmidt; William S. McIntyre, Appellants.Daniel D. RAPPA, Sr.v.STATE OF DELAWARE; Department of Transportation of theState of Delaware; Kermit H. Justice,* Ann Canby, Secretary, in her officialcapacity, and Kermit H. Justice, i

177 F.3d 161 ANKER ENERGY CORPORATION, and King Knob Coal Company, Inc., Appellants,v.CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY; United Mine Workers of AmericaCombined Benefit Fund; Marty D. Hudson, Trustee; MichaelH. Holland, Trustee; Thomas O.S. Rand, Trustee; Elliott A.Segal, Trustee; Carlton R. Sickles, Trustee; Gail R.Wilensky, Trustee; William P. Hobgood, Trustee; Kenneth S.Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security Admi

307 F.3d 222 BERWIND CORPORATIONv.COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY; United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund; Michael H. Holland; William P. Hobgood; Marty D. Hudson; Thomas O.S. Rand; Elliot A. Segal; Carl E. Vanhorn; Gail R. Wilensky, as Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund; the United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan; A. Frank Dunham, as Trustee of the United Mine Workers of America 199

178 F.3d 649 UNITY REAL ESTATE COMPANY, Appellant No. 97-3234,v.Marty D. HUDSON; Michael H. Holland; Thomas O.S. Rand;Elliott A. Segal; Carlton R. Sickles; Gail R. Wilensky;William P. Hopgood; Trustees of the United Mine Workers ofAmerica Combined Benefit Fund; Thomas F. Connors; RobertWallace; Trustees of the 1992 United Mine Workers of AmericaBenefit Plan; United States of America (Intervenor in District Court),LTV

MEMORANDUM OPINION KARON OWEN BOWDRE, District Judge. This Fair Labor Standards Act case presents the court with a dilemma: enforce arbitration agreements against Defendant Citi Trends Store Managers, who are potential opt-in Plaintiffs in this collective action that were obtained during the conditional certification stage of this case *1290

231 F.Supp.2d 1130 (2002) HYDRO ENGINEERING, INC., Plaintiffs, v. LANDA, INC., and Philip Kircher, Defendants. No. 2:02CV-0625DAK. United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division. November 27, 2002. *1131 *1132 Gary E. Atkin, Kenneth E. Atkin, Atkin & Associates, Salt Lake City, UT

HILLMAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendants Burlington County and Ronald Cox’s appeal [Doc. No. 74] of the November 13, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Order issued by the Honorable Joel Schneider, United States Magistrate Judge, granting Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint in this action. The Court has considered the parties’ submissions and decides this matter pursuant

THOMPSON, Associate Judge, dissenting: My colleagues in the majority conclude that appellant Jenkins is entitled to reversal of his first-degree murder and other convictions on the ground that the admission of DNA testimony by an expert who relayed the underlying laboratory analysts’ findings without the laboratory analysts having been called to testify violated appellant’s rights under the Sixth Amendment Confr

641 F.Supp.2d 1185 (2009) ABILENE RETAIL # 30, INC., d/b/a/ Lion's Den Adult Superstore, Plaintiff, v. Stephen N. SIX, In his Official Capacity as Kansas Attorney General, Defendant. No. 09-2195-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 26, 2009. *1186 John Michael Murray, Raymond V. Vasvari, Jr., Berkman, Gordon, Murray

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: Plaintiff Joseph Parker brings this action against his former employer, Defendant Sideby-Side, Inc. d/b/a Sidetrack (“Sidetrack”), and four former coworkers (the “Individual Defendants”). Plaintiff asserts claims against Sidetrack for sexual harassment, religious harassment, and retaliation under the Civil Rights Act of 1964,

Joseph F. Leeson, Jr., United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership ("Adams") challenges the constitutionality of the Interchange Prohibition in Pennsylvania's Outdoor Advertising Control Act of 1971, 36 P.S. §§ 2718.101 - 2718.115 (the "Act"). See also Pa. Code §§ 445.1-445.9. Defendant Leslie S. Richards ("Richards"), the Secretary o

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH, with whom Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH joins, and with whom Circuit Judge HENDERSON .joins as to Parts I, IV, and V. Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge RANDOLPH. Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge: INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2021 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

OPINION SHIPP, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on application for a preliminary injunction by Plaintiffs National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”), National Basketball Association (“NBA”), National Football *491League (“NFL”), National Hockey League (“NHL”), and Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, doing business as Ma

720 F.Supp.2d 622 (2010) LIBERTY AND PROSPERITY 1776, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jon CORZINE, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-2642 (JBS). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 24, 2010. *624 Robert Loefflad, Esq., Seth Grossman & Associates, Somers Point, NJ, for Plaintiffs Liberty and Prosperity 1776, Inc.; Se

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 05a0070p.06 UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiffs-App

930 A.2d 1236 (2007) 396 N.J. Super. 23 STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Wayne DeANGELO, Defendant-Appellant. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued March 21, 2007. Decided September 13, 2007. *1239 Andrew L. Watson, Princeton, argued the cause for appellant (Pellettieri, Rabs

Affirmed and Opinion filed February 6, 2003 Affirmed and Opinion filed February 6, 2003. In The