Cases

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael L. Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael L. Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United St

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED January 2025 Term _____________ June 10, 2025 released at 3:00 p.m. C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK

433 N.W.2d 895 (1988) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Raymond Edward MOORE, Appellant. No. C8-88-345. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 20, 1988. *896 Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul R. Kempainen, Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Raymond F. Schmitz, Olmsted Co. Atty., Rochester, for respondent. C. Paul Jones,

DECISION This matter came on for hearing before Mr. Justice Lanphear on September 22, 2008, on Roger and Margo Malouins' motion for summary judgment, as well as Defendants *Page 2 Clay Chipman's and West Warwick's cross-motions.1 After hearing thereon, the Court reserved decision on all Counts and will address each one in turn at this time.

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge: This appeal from a denial of a petition for habeas corpus concerns the parole guidelines currently being used by the United States Parole Commission. 28 C.F.R. § 2.20 (1978). The issue is whether the guidelines may be applied to a “(b)(2)” federal prisoner sentenced under 18 U.S.C. § 4205(b)(2) (1976), which makes him eligible for parole at any time, rathe

411 F.Supp.2d 639 (2005) Teia KIRKLAND, a minor, by her Mother and Guardian Ad Litem, Sharon Moore, and Sharon Moore and Eddie Kirkland, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. SAM'S EAST, INC. d/b/a Sam's Club, a foreign corporation, Defendant. C.A. No.: 9:03-cv-2891-23. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Beaufort Division. December 13, 2005.

196 S.W.3d 311 (2006) In re RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.; Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.; Robert Thomas Securities, Inc.; and Raymond James Financial, Inc., Relators. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.; Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.; Robert Thomas Securities, Inc.; and Raymond James Financial, Inc., Appellants, v. Alicia Bowman; David Anderson Carp, as Trustee for L.E. Minor, Jr. and as Trustee for the Carp Family T

761 F.Supp. 112 (1991) Teresa Lynn MOORE and her father and next friend Daniel Moore, Plaintiffs, v. Neil HYCHE, individually and as Superintendent of Instruction of the Tuscaloosa County Board of Education; Bobby Walker, individually and as Principal of Tuscaloosa County High School; Faye Leavelle, individually and as the Sponsor of the Tuscaloosa County High School Beta Club, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 90-G-1057-W. <

PER CURIAM. Robert G. McGowan, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on a multi-plaintiff 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint filed by McGowan and over three hundred other inmates. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Blackburn v. Moore, No. CA-99-102 (D.S.C. filed Mar. 28

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 15a0196p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ SHANNON LADEL KEYS, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │

EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge: Following a jury trial, the district court entered judgment imposing liability on Defendant-Appellant Wayne Triche for violations of the Louisiana Securities Law, La. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 51.701 et seq. Triche appealed the judgment to this court and, for the reasons to be explained, we AFFIRM. Facts and

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-122 No. 342PA19-2 Filed 16 December 2022 JABARI HOLMES, FRED CULP, DANIEL E. SMITH, BRENDON JADEN PEAY, and PAUL KEARNEY, SR. v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Caroli

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-122 No. 342PA19-2 Filed 16 December 2022 JABARI HOLMES, FRED CULP, DANIEL E. SMITH, BRENDON JADEN PEAY, and PAUL KEARNEY, SR. v. TIMOTHY K. MOORE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives; PHILIP E. BERGER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the North Caroli

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-94-00513-CR Raymond Edward Long, Appellant v. The Stat

501 F.3d 548 (2007) Douglas J. RAYMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas J. MOYER, Chief Justice; Alice Robie Resnick, Justice; Paul E. Pfeifer, Justice; Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, Justice; Maureen O'Connor, Justice; Terrence O'Donnell, Justice; Judith Ann Lanzinger, Justice; Robert R. Cupp, Justice, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-4081. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

305 S.E.2d 562 (1983) Edward L. MOORE and Edward L. Moore, III partners D/B under the firm name and style of Moore's Seafood Co. v. Dewey Ray FRAZIER. No. 823SC772. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 2, 1983. *563 Ward & Smith by Kenneth R. Wooten, New Bern, for plaintiffs-appellants. Dunn & Dunn by Raymond

121 Cal.App.3d 785 (1981) 175 Cal. Rptr. 359 In re RAYMOND B., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAYMOND B., Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 38428. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. June 24, 1981. *788 COUNSEL

PHILLIPS, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from a conviction for manufacturing and possessing depressant or stimulant drugs, following a Jury trial and the denial of a motion for a new trial. Clarke Moore, John Spelz, and Charles Reinking were indicted for conspiring to knowingly manufacture, compound, process

OPINION SILER, Circuit Judge. This housing discrimination case turns on what doors must be accessible to the handicapped. At issue are two sets of apartment complexes, designed with an inaccessible front door, but an accessible back patio door. The district court granted the U.S. Justice Department (“government”) a preliminary injunction halting the cons