Cases

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 466 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 467 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE N

Chambers, J. — In a contested hearing, Helen Maxwell was found to have committed a lane change violation, a traffic infraction. We are asked to determine whether collateral estoppel effect should be given this finding in a subsequent personal injury action. The offense was minor, and when there is nothing more at stake than a nominal fine, there is little incentive to vigorously litigate the issue. Therefore we hold the determina

408 F.3d 1052 FOREST PARK II, a Minnesota Limited Partnership, Appellant,v.Katherine HADLEY, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency; City of Forest Lake, Minnesota; Minnesota Metropolitan Council; Forest Park II Tenants Association; Richard Psyck; Jeremy Cahill; Cassandra Johnson; Tara Wood; Dawn Byland; Nicole Cook; John Hill; Teressa Barnett; Jennifer Rauito; Margie Barnett; Troy Durant; Carolyn Brown; Ant

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. In this appeal following our prior remand, Forest Park II challenges the judgment of the district court 1 denying in part its motion for judgment on the pleadings. Specifically, Forest Park II complains that the district court erred in denying its motion for an injunction, dismissing its 42 U.S.

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Appellants Forest Park II (Forest Park), Troy Durant, and Jeannette Forga appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment and its issuance of a permanent injunction requiring Forest Park to comply with various Minnesota state statutes before prepaying its federally subsidized mortgage. Because we hold that the state statutes are preempted, we reverse

TAYLOR, C.J. We granted leave in this case to determine whether plaintiff, Ricky Reed, who was fired from defendant Mr. Food, Inc., but continued to assist with deliveries on a periodic basis, was an employee of Mr. Food within the meaning of MCL 418.161(1)(Z) and (n) of the Worker’s Disability Compensation Act (WDCA)1 and, thus, prohibited from maintaini

803 N.E.2d 48 (2003) 345 Ill. App.3d 297 280 Ill.Dec. 818 Willie B. HADLEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim RYAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Donald N. Snyder Jr., Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections; and Guy Pierce, Warden, Pinckneyville Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees. No. 4-02-0421. Appellate Court of Illinois,

NO. 4-02-0421 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT WILLIE B. HADLEY, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JIM RYAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois,

27 P.3d 600 (2001) 144 Wash.2d 306 Harry W. HADLEY and Jewell Hadley, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, Respondents, v. John Doe MAXWELL and Helen Maxwell, husband and wife and the marital community composed thereof, Appellants. No. 69521-1. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. Argued January 18, 2001. Decided

OPINION ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice. Ronald Lindsey Reed was convicted of conspiracy and aiding and abetting the murder of a police officer. On direct appeal, we affirmed Reed’s convictions. State v. Reed (Reed I), 737 N.W.2d 572 (Minn.2007). Reed then sought postcon-viction relief, asserting that the district court violated his constitutional right to self-representation, the statute of limitati

FORET, Judge. Plaintiffs, Hadley J. Vizinat and his wife, Sally Vidrine Vizinat, brought this action for unjust enrichment to recover rent al*264legedly due them from defendants, Donald Reed and Mae Young Reed. Trial of this action resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants, who bring this appeal. Defendants present the following issues:

671 N.W.2d 42 (2003) Ricky REED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Linda Susan YACKELL, Defendant, and Buddy Lee Hadley, Gerald Michael Herskovitz and Mr. Food, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. Docket No. 123711, COA No. 236588. Supreme Court of Michigan. November 17, 2003. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the judgment of the Court of Appeals is consi

124 B.R. 679 (1991) Thomas J. HADLEY and Gas House, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Scott GERRIE, d/b/a Alexander's, Defendant. GAS HOUSE, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNICORP AMERICAN CORPORATION, formerly Institutional Investors Trust, Defendant. Thomas J. HADLEY and Gas House, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. William and Hope GERRIE, Defendants. Civ. Nos. 1988/15, 1988/16, Bankruptcy No. 387-00017, Adv. No. 388-001.

Pratt, J. The law seems to be firmly settled that natural love and affection do not constitute a sufficient consideration to support an executory contract. Whitaker v. Whitaker, 52 N. Y. 372; Fink v. Cox, 18 Johns. 145; Harris v. Clark, 3 N. Y. 93. Starting from this point, the question arises *164whether there is anyt

262 Kan. 234 (1997) 936 P.2d 1347 CITY OF DODGE CITY, Appellee, v. ROBERT HADLEY, Appellant. No. 77,221. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 18, 1997. Leslie Phelps Hess, of Patton, Kerbs & Hess, of Dodge City, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant. Terry J. Malone, city attorney, argued the cau

THIRD DIVISION August 29, 2007 No. 1-06-1710 WILLIAM REED, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellant, ) Cook County. ) v.

Mr. Justice Wolfe delivered the opinion of the court. James Hadley, plaintiff in error, was an acquaintance of Mary Dolan and Gertrude Natoli, who were being tried in the county court of DuPage county on information charging them with petit larceny. On the 4th day of March, while the case was on trial, about 11 o’clock in the morning a recess was taken and the jury permitted

876 N.E.2d 94 (2007) William REED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RETIREMENT BOARD OF the FIREMAN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1-06-1710. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. August 29, 2007. *96 Martin O. Holland, Evergreen Park, for Appellant. Mary Patricia Burns, Vincen

514 S.E.2d 171 (1991) 204 W.Va. 520 STATE of West Virginia ex rel. the STATE of West Virginia, Petitioner, v. Honorable Jeffrey B. REED, Judge of the Circuit Court of Wood County, and Samuel William White, Respondents. No. 25356. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted January 12, 1999. Decided January 29, 1999.

479 F.Supp. 189 (1979) Major Phillip E. HADLEY, Plaintiff, v. SECRETARY OF the ARMY et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 78-2406. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 17, 1979. Alan Dranitzke, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff. Nathan Dodell, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., for defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER