Cases

693 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2010) Susan REESE, Plaintiff, v. BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, Defendant. No. CIV. S-08-1703 FCD GGH. United States District Court, E.D. California. March 3, 2010. *1175 Catherine M. Corfee, Corfee Stone and Associates, Carmichael, CA, for Plaintiff. Kathleen Mary Abdallah, Thomas O. Perry, Matthew S. Reyn

(2008) Susan REESE, Plaintiff, v. BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, Defendant. No. CIV. S-08-1703 FCD GGH. United States District Court, E.D. California. December 15, 2008. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR., District Judge. This matter comes before the court on defendant Barton Healthcare Systems' ("Barton") motion to dismiss plainti

This case was originally assigned to another judge on the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals. It was reassigned to Judge Cobb on January 17, 1995. *Page 881 Leon Carmichael, Jr., filed a Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition with the Montgomery Circuit Court challenging his convictions for murder and possession of an unlawful substance. The trial court denied the petition saying it was successive. "The court in Blount v. S

MEAD, J. [¶ 1] Olland Reese appeals from a judgment of the trial court (Sagadahoc County, Warren, J.) dismissing Grounds 1-5 of his second petition for post-conviction review prior to the evidentiary hearing on the petition. Those grounds asserted that Reese’s counsel in his first petition for post-conviction review, which was denied in 2009, was ineffective. The court concluded that Maine law does not permit a second

OSCN Found Document:WINHAM v. REESE OSCN navigation Home Courts Court Dockets

JOHN F. FISCHER, JUDGE: ¶ 1 Appellant Billie Winham appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of Joe Reese, M.D. and Thomas David Schiller, M.D. The appeal has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36(b), 12 O.S. Supp. 2013, eh. 15, app. 1, and the matter stands submitted without appellate briefing. Because the expert witness

433 F.Supp.2d 1259 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Leon CARMICHAEL, Sr. Criminal Action No. 2:03CR259-MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. June 7, 2006. *1260 A. Clark Morris, Matthew S. Miner, John T. Harmon, Terry F. Moorer, Stephen P. Feaga, U.S. Attorney's Office, Montgomery, AL, for United S

419 F.Supp.2d 1376 (2006) UNITED STATES of America v. Leon CARMICHAEL, Sr. No. Crim. A. 203CR259MHT. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 14, 2006. A. Clark Morris, Matthew S. Miner, John T. Harmon, Terry F. Moorer, Stephen P. Feaga, U.S. Attorney's Office, Montgomery, AL, for Plaintiff. OPINION MYRON H. THOMPS

SECOND DIVISION MILLER, P. J., RICKMAN and REESE, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules November

Affirmed.

570 S.W.2d 528 (1978) Juanita Brittian REESE et al., Appellants, v. Lewis Vincent BRITTIAN, Jr., et al., Appellees. No. 8897. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Amarillo. August 28, 1978. Rehearing Denied September 25, 1978. *529 LaFont, Tunnell, Formby, LaFont & Hamilton, Larry W. McEachern, Plainview, for app

JUSTICE McNAMARA, dissenting: I respectfully dissent with the majority’s conclusion that defendants owe a. duty to a plaintiff who was not a patient, did not use the prescribed drug, and whose injury was not reasonably foreseeable. The majority’s extension of tort duty to such a remote party will unduly burden the heal

Thomas V. La Fauci, J. This is a consolidation of 16 separate summary proceedings for the nonpayment of rent brought by the Federal Housing Commissioner, as landlord, against 16 separate tenants at premises No. 109-15 Merrick Boulevard and 109-25 Merrick Boulevard, St. Albans, Queens, N. Y., known as Addesleigh Apartments. The premises constitutes two six-story residential elevator dwellings for a total of 1

93 Ga. App. 10 (1955) 90 S.E.2d 683 REESE v. BROWN et al. 35901. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided November 7, 1955. Casey Thigpen, for plaintiff in error. D. E. McMaster, McMillan, Dukes & McMillan, contra. FELTON, C. J. 1. Where the plaintiff has closed his evidence and has failed to make out a prim

MacIntyre, J. Frank Rogers brought this suit against Andrew Carmichael as the sole surviving partner of Carmichael & Hopkins, to recover damages for personal injuries caused by alleged negligence of A. V. Hopkins, the deceased partner. On the trial of the case the only evidence introduced was that of the plaintiff. After the plaintiff had closed, certain testimony given by him was excluded by the court; and on motion the cour

Jenkins, P. J. 1. “If exception be taken to a final judgment as being erroneous in itself, the assignment of error should specifically set forth the error or errors in it which are complained of; ” but if the ruling or decision complained of is one preceding the final judgment, and it is especially made the subject of exception and of proper assignment of error, and the final judgment is excepted to, not because of additional er

John Ray, formerly of Cumberland County in this State, removed into Marion district in South Carolina, and there died intestate in 1842. Administration of his estate was granted in South Carolina to Malcom R. Carmichael, one of the plaintiffs, and in North Carolina to Archibald Ray, one of the defendants. At the time of his death the intestate held several notes and bonds given to him by the defendant Archibald, who was his son, and was also, as alleged in the bill, otherwise indebted to his

The alleged errors are imperfectly assigned, and we find it difficult to determine the meaning and application of some of them. Such as apply to alleged erroneous findings of fact, we cannot correct, if, indeed, they exist, because this is simply an action at law, and we have not jurisdiction to review the findings of fact. We can only correct errors of law, in the admission of evidence, and in other respects, properly assigned. If we fail to reach the whole merits of

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 262 Alice Shewmake, individually and as conservator and guardian of the estate of her husband, Charlie Burrell Shewmake, Sr., appeals from a judgment entered by the Montgomery Probate Court upon a settlement agreement. We affirm. Mrs. Shewmake was appointed guardian and conservator of Mr. Shewmake's estat

216 S.W.3d 384 (2006) CITY OF ANSON, Appellant, v. Dorothy Davis Jones HARPER, Donna D. Fitzpatrick, Bobby Joe Jones, Annie Marie Jones Spruit, Pauline Jones Morgan, Reese Davis, Mary Evelyn Hanson, James Ann Reneau, Travis W. Davis, Audrey D. Hudson, and Cottonwood Petroleum Company, Appellees. No. 11-05-00398-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. July 13, 2006.