⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Reeves v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC”

Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019-04-17 · Published · cited 0× · 440 P.3d 686; 297 Or. App. 192
Affirmed without opinion.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-09-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 20-cv-02697 (DLF) v. RFB PROPERTIES, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, the F
California Court of Appeal · 2017-01-31 · Published · cited 69× · 7 Cal. App. 5th 1318; 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 395; 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 66
Opinion O’ROURKE, J. In this case, plaintiff OC Interior Services, LLC (OCI), purchased real property knowing about a recorded default judgment in the chain of title that vacated the lien interest of the predecessor in interest to appellants Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, in trust for the Harborview Mortgage Loan pass-through certificates, se
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2016-04-21 · Published · cited 8× · 182 F. Supp. 3d 648; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53649; 2016 WL 1598840
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, and Alternatively, Motion for New Trial (Dkt. #89). After considering the relevant pleadings and the relevant trial testimony and evidence, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of la
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-01-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ) ASSOCIATION and NATIONSTAR ) MORTGAGE, LLC, ) ) WD76276 Appellants, )
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2020-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00238-CV ___________________________ JOSEPH LITTLETON, Appellant V. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE L.L.C., Appellee On Appeal from the 48th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 048-299558-18 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-03-30 · Published · cited 7× · 247 F. Supp. 3d 618
OPINION Slomsky, District Judge Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 626 II. BACKGROUND...626 A. Conveyance of the Property and the Terms of the First Mortgage... 626 B. The Fire Insurance Policy.. .628 C. The Second Mortgage Assignment ...629 D. Fire Loss and Insurance Proceeds ...629</
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-01-14 · Published · cited 2× · 428 S.W.3d 661; 82 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 421; 2014 WL 113555; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 31
MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge. The Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (“Nationstar”), appeal the “final judgment”1 of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri (“trial court”), dated February 11, 2013, (1) granting summary judgment to Jeffrey and Angela Conover (“the Conovers”) in their wrongful foreclosure/quiet title claim against Fannie Mae a
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-02-03 · Published · cited 5× · 210 So. 3d 229; 2017 WL 456937; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1250
BERGER, J. Glen Garrón, LLC, appeals both the trial court’s order dismissing its foreclosure complaint against Marla Buchwald and the order denying its motions for rehearing and leave to file an amended complaint. Glen Garrón raises two issues on appeal. First, it argues that the trial court erred in dismissing the foreclosure action for failure to attach a copy of the note to t
District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019-03-01 · Published · cited 15× · 372 F. Supp. 3d 609
Joan B. Gottschall, United States District Judge In February 2015, Monette Saccameno ("Saccameno") sued Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC ("Ocwen") and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for C-Bass Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007 RP1 ("U.S. Bank"), alleging that they had engaged in wrongful loan servicing and debt collection practices.1 In April 2018, the case went to trial and Sacca
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017-10-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHESTER COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ ) RETIREMENT FUND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 11058-VCMR ) NEW RESIDENTIAL ) INVESTMENT CORP., WESLEY R. ) EDENS, MICHAEL NIERENBERG, ) ALAN L. TYSON, DAVID ) SALTZMAN, KEVIN J. FINNERTY, ) DOUGLAS L. JACOBS, FIG LLC, ) FORTRESS INVEST
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2016-10-07 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHESTER COUNTY EMPLOYEES‘ ) RETIREMENT FUND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 11058-VCMR ) NEW RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT ) CORP., WESLEY R. EDENS, ) MICHAEL NIERENBERG, ALAN L. ) TYSON, DAVID SALTZMAN, ) KEVIN J. FINNERTY, DOUGLAS L. ) JACOBS, FIG LLC, FORTRESS ) INVE
California Court of Appeal · 2020-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/17/20; Certified for Publication 8/12/20 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- VIRGINIA M. ARNOLD, C087465 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2015
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-06-03 · Published · cited 4× · 999 F.3d 1185
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. BANK, N.A., Trustee for the No. 19-15918 Holders of the J.P. Morgan Mortgage Trust 2007-S3, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Counter- 2:15-cv-01484-KJD- Defendant-Appellant, GWF v. ORDER SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS CERTIFYING COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, QUE
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2021-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed July 26, 2021 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00632-CV HOLDEN THOMAS, HERBERT THOMAS AND JACKSON THOMAS, Appellants V. WM. CHARLES BUNDREN & ASSOCIATES LAW GROUP PLLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 471st Judicial District
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-02-26 · Published · cited 4× · 237 N.E.3d 274; 2024 Ohio 698
[Cite as Universal Steel Bldgs. Corp. v. Dues, 2024-Ohio-698.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY UNIVERSAL STEEL BUILDINGS CORP., DBA OLYMPIA STEEL BUILDINGS CORPORATION, CASE NO. 10-22-07 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT, v. DANIEL DUES, ET AL., OPIN
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2024-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
Bethesda African Cemetery Coalition, et al. v. Housing Opportunities Commission of Montgomery County, No. 18, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Biran, J. COMMON LAW – BURIAL GROUNDS – THE COMMON LAW OF BURIAL PLACES – The Supreme Court of Maryland recognized the common law of burial places in Maryland. This body of law developed in the United States in the courts of equity after the rejection of the ecclesiastical law of England, and it attaches when human remains are interred in land. The Court
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2022-11-08 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019-01-23 · Published · cited 12× · 362 F. Supp. 3d 1021
JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Nambe Pueblo Development Corporation's1 Motion to Dismiss, filed October 1, 2018 (Doc. 14)("Motion"). The Court held a hearing on December 21, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case, wherein Plaintiff World Fuel Services, Inc. -- a non
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-03-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00737-CV 4701431 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS