Cases

Joseph M. Hood, Senior U.S. District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. [DE 60]. Having considered the matter fully, and being otherwise sufficiently advised, the undersigned will grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint [DE 60]. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 2, 2014, Plaintiff

ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.us. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA STATE OF ALASKA and THE ) COMMISSIONER OF THE ) Supreme Court No. S-16123 DEPARTM

*637 MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief Judge. This civil case is before the Court on two motions: a Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Mike Myers [Doc. 58] filed by former Police Chief Mike Myers (“Myers”); and a separate Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 62] filed by the Town of Vonore (“Vonore”), Vonore Mayor Larry Summey (

[Cite as Gilson v. Am. Inst. of Alternative Medicine, 2016-Ohio-1324.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Tamar Gilson, : Plaintiff-Appellee/ : Cross-Appellant, : v. No. 15AP-548

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge. Plaintiff Robert Dali brings the above-captioned action against Defendant St. Catherine of Siena Medical Center (“Medical Center”), asserting claims of gender discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and the New York State Huma

697 F.Supp.2d 831 (2010) Rudolph ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL WORK, et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:07-cv-1116. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 12, 2010. *835 Rayl L. Stepter, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Jack Wilson Decker, Drew Corner Piersall, Ohio Atto

638 S.E.2d 879 (2006) MONTERREY MEXICAN RESTAURANT OF WISE, INC. et al. v. LEON. No. A06A1314. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 17, 2006. *882 Michael T. Smith, Brook A. Davidson, Raymon D. Burns, Andrew, Merritt, Reilly & Smith, L.L.P., Lawrenceville, for appellants. Ron L. Quigley, Davis, Matthews & Quigley,

129 F.Supp.2d 870 (2000) Patrick IHEKWU, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant. No. 1:99CV00420. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. December 27, 2000. *871 *872 *873 Thomas Henry Moore, Haywood Denny & Miller, L.L.P

Reversed in part, vacated and remanded in part, and affirmed in part by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINS, Judge WILKINSON, Judge LUTTIG, Judge MICHAEL, Judge MOTZ, Judge TRAXLER, Judge KING, Judge GREGORY, Judge SHEDD, and Judge DUNCAN joined. Judge WILKINSON wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a separat

KEITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s holding. The majority improperly holds that the plaintiffs, female corrections officers, who claim that their employer Belmont Correctional Institution discriminated against them, based on their sex, cannot bring a class action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2) to collectively enforce the rights and remedies afforded

599 S.E.2d 888 (2004) 358 N.C. 649 NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, Division of Parks and Recreation, Petitioner v. L. Clifton CARROLL, Respondent. No. 329PA03. Supreme Court of North Carolina. August 13, 2004. *890 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Edwin Lee Gavin II, Assista

658 F.Supp.2d 700 (2009) Lorn Glenn WEBB, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CRIME CONTROL AND PUBLIC SAFETY, ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, Defendant. No. 7:08-CV-90-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. September 11, 2009. *703 Julius LeVonne Chambers, Ferguson Stein Chambers Gresha

257 F.Supp.2d 208 (2003) COMMUNITY HOUSING TRUST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-02120(HHK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 16, 2003. *211 Reed N. Colfax, Washington's Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights, Washington, DC, for plaint

ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

WALKER, Justice: This appeal concerns a dispute between the West Virginia State Lottery, the Lottery Commission, the Lottery Director,1 (collectively, *763the State Lottery) and certain entities (Permit Holders) who were issued permits to operate limited video lottery game terminals (LVL terminals). The dispute aros

St. Eve, Circuit Judge. Glenn Lewellen, a dirty cop with the Chicago Police Department (CPD), arrested Refugio Ruiz-Cortez for possessing cocaine. Lewellen served as the key witness at the trial, where Ruiz-Cortez was convicted. Ruiz-Cortez then spent a decade in prison before the federal government discovered Lewellen's crimes, which included drug conspiracy, racketeering, and, accordi

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2115 Doc: 43 Filed: 04/15/2024 Pg: 1 of 37 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-2115 CAMERON LEWIS, individually, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KEVIN CARABALLO, individually, and in his official capacity as a Maryland State

REEVES, District Judge. Plaintiff Cornelius Hoevenaar is a native American of Cherokee ancestry currently serving a life sentence in the Ohio prison system. While incarcerated, Hoevenaar began to practice a native religion which prohibits him from cutting his hair. As a result, Hoevenaar claims that prison rules regulating hair length violate his right to practice his religious

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BEATY, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #30] filed by Defendant North Carolina A & T State University1 (“Defendant”). In his complaint, Bernard L. Westbrook (“Plaintiff’) asserts claims of religious discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act o