⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

16 opinions for “Regina G Etheridge”

Yeomans v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2004-02-27 · Published · cited 11× · 898 So. 2d 878; 2004 WL 362229
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 880 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 881 James Donald Yeomans was convicted of four counts of capital murder following the beating and shooting deaths of his wife
North Carolina Business Court · 2020-09-15 · Published · cited 0×
Bradshaw v. Maiden, 2020 NCBC 60A. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 14 CVS 14445 JAMES W. BRADSHAW; CARLA O. BRADSHAW; RESORT RETAIL ASSOCIATES, INC.; E.C. BROADFOOT; CHRISTINA DUNN CHANDRA; THOMAS F. EGAN; CHARLES EGGERT; MARK P. GARSIDE; DR. JAMES J. GREEN, JR.; ROBERT K. GRUNEWALD; RONALD HOLMES; DAVID LAUCK; CURT W. LEMKAU, JR.; EVAN MIDDLE
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008-05-08 · Published · cited 125× · 524 F.3d 549; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9837; 2008 WL 1970980
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in Part III of the majority’s opinion with respect to the convictions and sentences of the defendants Brooks, W. Sparks, V. Sparks, and Witherspoon. I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and judgment with respect to the defendant Mathis. With respect to Mathis, the major
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012-09-28 · Published · cited 1× · 900 F. Supp. 2d 669; 2012 WL 4606221; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142842
OPINION IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, District Judge. This litigation involves complicated fact pattens and interwoven legal issues. It begins with a series of vessel chartering agreements by American Commercial Lines, Inc. (“ACL”) and D.R.D. Towing Company, LLC (“DRD”) — an arrangement described by ACL as a “two step, two contract process”. Record Document Number 1381, p. 55. The pertinent arrang
Revells v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006-10-25 · Published · cited 0× · 283 Ga. App. 59; 640 S.E.2d 587
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. Raymond Revells and his wife, Amanda Karklis, appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motions for new trial following their convictions by a jury of three counts of cruelty to a child, L. R.,1 Raymond Revells’ then nearly four-year-old daughter.2 Revells and Karklis both challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Karklis additionally chal
Revells v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006-10-25 · Published · cited 2× · 640 S.E.2d 587; 283 Ga. App. 59
640 S.E.2d 587 (2006) REVELLS v. The STATE. Karklis v. The State. Nos. A06A1540, A06A1541. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 25, 2006. Reconsideration Denied December 15, 2006. *589 Clark C. Adams, Jr., Columbus, for appellant (case no. A06A1540). James D. Lamb, Waycross, for appellant (case
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013-03-22 · Published · cited 0×
REVISED MARCH 20, 2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 27, 2013 No. 09-60651
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013-02-27 · Published · cited 55× · 710 F.3d 249; 2013 WL 708170; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4035
KING, Circuit Judge: A federal jury found Sears, Roebuck and Co. liable for causing Lisa Learmonth’s injuries in an automobile accident. In a general verdict, the jury awarded her $4 million in compensatory damages. On Sears’ motion, the district court interpreted the award to include $2.2 million in noneconomic damages, then reduced this portion of the award to $1 million pursua
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978-06-07 · Published · cited 71× · 581 F.2d 933; 189 U.S. App. D.C. 155; 48 A.L.R. Fed. 709; 3 Fed. R. Serv. 31; 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10853
581 F.2d 933 48 A.L.R.Fed. 709, 189 U.S.App.D.C. 155,3 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 31 UNITED STATES of Americav.William D. MORGAN, Appellant. No. 77-1571. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Jan. 9, 1978.Decided June 7, 1978. Appeal from the United S
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 78× · 912 F.3d 348
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0280p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TAMARIN LINDENBERG, individually and as natural ┐ guardian of her minor children ZTL and SML, │ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, │
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Strauss v. Hortonpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2009-06-17 · Published · cited 65× · 46 Cal. 4th 364
46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Ohio Supreme Court · 1885-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 43 Ohio St. (N.S.) 16
Johnson, J. It appears from the petition that during the trial of relator for murder in the second degree, numerous exceptions were taken by him to the rulings of the court; that he consented to postpone reducing them to writing in order not to delay the trial, and that after the overruling of the motion for a new trial, he further excepted, and consented that his exceptions might subsequently be reduced to writing; that during the