Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Regina G Etheridge”
Yeomans v. Statepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 880 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 881 James Donald Yeomans was convicted of four counts of capital murder following the beating and shooting deaths of his wife
Bradshaw v. Maiden, 2020 Ncbc 60apublic domain
Bradshaw v. Maiden, 2020 NCBC 60A. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 14 CVS 14445 JAMES W. BRADSHAW; CARLA O. BRADSHAW; RESORT RETAIL ASSOCIATES, INC.; E.C. BROADFOOT; CHRISTINA DUNN CHANDRA; THOMAS F. EGAN; CHARLES EGGERT; MARK P. GARSIDE; DR. JAMES J. GREEN, JR.; ROBERT K. GRUNEWALD; RONALD HOLMES; DAVID LAUCK; CURT W. LEMKAU, JR.; EVAN MIDDLE
United States v. Brookspublic domain
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: I concur in Part III of the majority’s opinion with respect to the convictions and sentences of the defendants Brooks, W. Sparks, V. Sparks, and Witherspoon. I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion and judgment with respect to the defendant Mathis. With respect to Mathis, the major
Gabarick v. Laurin Maritime (America), Inc.public domain
OPINION IVAN L.R. LEMELLE, District Judge. This litigation involves complicated fact pattens and interwoven legal issues. It begins with a series of vessel chartering agreements by American Commercial Lines, Inc. (“ACL”) and D.R.D. Towing Company, LLC (“DRD”) — an arrangement described by ACL as a “two step, two contract process”. Record Document Number 1381, p. 55. The pertinent arrang
Revells v. Statepublic domain
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. Raymond Revells and his wife, Amanda Karklis, appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motions for new trial following their convictions by a jury of three counts of cruelty to a child, L. R.,1 Raymond Revells’ then nearly four-year-old daughter.2 Revells and Karklis both challenge the sufficiency of the evidence. Karklis additionally chal
Revells v. Statepublic domain
640 S.E.2d 587 (2006) REVELLS v. The STATE. Karklis v. The State. Nos. A06A1540, A06A1541. Court of Appeals of Georgia. October 25, 2006. Reconsideration Denied December 15, 2006. *589 Clark C. Adams, Jr., Columbus, for appellant (case no. A06A1540). James D. Lamb, Waycross, for appellant (case
Lisa Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.public domain
REVISED MARCH 20, 2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED February 27, 2013 No. 09-60651
Lisa Learmonth v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.public domain
KING, Circuit Judge: A federal jury found Sears, Roebuck and Co. liable for causing Lisa Learmonth’s injuries in an automobile accident. In a general verdict, the jury awarded her $4 million in compensatory damages. On Sears’ motion, the district court interpreted the award to include $2.2 million in noneconomic damages, then reduced this portion of the award to $1 million pursua
United States v. William D. Morganpublic domain
581 F.2d 933 48 A.L.R.Fed. 709, 189 U.S.App.D.C. 155,3 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 31 UNITED STATES of Americav.William D. MORGAN, Appellant. No. 77-1571. United States Court of Appeals,District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Jan. 9, 1978.Decided June 7, 1978. Appeal from the United S
Tamarin Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0280p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TAMARIN LINDENBERG, individually and as natural ┐ guardian of her minor children ZTL and SML, │ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, │
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Strauss v. Hortonpublic domain
46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
State ex rel. Otenberger v. Hawespublic domain
Johnson, J. It appears from the petition that during the trial of relator for murder in the second degree, numerous exceptions were taken by him to the rulings of the court; that he consented to postpone reducing them to writing in order not to delay the trial, and that after the overruling of the motion for a new trial, he further excepted, and consented that his exceptions might subsequently be reduced to writing; that during the