Cases

606 S.E.2d 586 (2004) 270 Ga. App. 349 SEAY v. CHASE MANHATTAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION. No. A04A2282. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 5, 2004. Reginald Seay, Decatur, pro se. Robert M. Sheffield, McCalla, Raymer, Padrick & Cobb, Roswell, for appellee. MILLER, Judge. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation (Chase) file

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2416 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Reginald Robinson, Jr.

887 F.Supp. 1435 (1995) Deah M. SCALES and Reginald Scales, Plaintiffs, v. SONIC INDUSTRIES, INC., and Newton Investments, Inc., both d/b/a Sonic Drive-In Restaurants, Defendants. No. 94-622-S. United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma. May 1, 1995. *1436 Thomas J. Hadley, Antlers, OK, for plaintiff. Clifford K. Cate, Jr

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: City police officers wished to question a suspect about a bank robbery, but lacked probable cause to arrest him. The officers therefore unearthed a seven-year-old warrant charging the suspect with contempt of court by virtue of his failure to appear for trial on a misdemeanor theft charge. They then arrested him, using that charge as a pretext to que

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge: Hillcrest Foods, Inc., d.b.a. The Waffle House, appeals from a judgment entered against it on a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress brought by Reginald Middlebrooks and seven other plaintiffs.1 Hillcrest argues that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law for numerous reasons, that the Middlebrooks group was

HILL, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs claim that certain tax provisions of the Alabama Constitution violate the United States Constitution. They assert that these tax provisions so seriously underfund public education in Alabama that they have a segregative effect on Alabama’s colleges and universities. The district court denied the claim, and this appeal followed.

469 F.Supp.2d 1016 (2006) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs and Plaintiffs-Intervenors, United States of America, Plaintiff, v. The State of ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. CV-83-M-1676-S. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Southern Division. December 12, 2006. *1017

La Familia Cosmovision, Inc. v. The Inspiration Networks, 2014 NCBC 51. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 13 CVS 1079 LA FAMILIA COSMOVISION, INC., ) successor in interest to ) Production Facilities, LLC, ) Plaintiff

963 F.2d 1352 60 USLW 2733 HOMEWARD BOUND, INC., on behalf of its members; BridgetBecker, by her mother and next friend Mary Ann Becker; JohnDouglas Berry, by his parents and next friends John and JudyBerry; Michael Brasier, by his parents and next friendsJohn P. and Sharon Brasier; Deminkyn Martin, by his nextfriend Mary Ann Becker; Julie Marie Paulson, by her nextfriends Paul and Susan Pau

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 6, 2002 Session JACKIE D. DILLARD v. MEHARRY MEDICAL COLLEGE, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 95C-3712 Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr., Judge No. M2001-02038-COA-R3-CV - Filed July 9, 2002 The jury returned a verdict for the defendant surgeon and hospital in thi

05/14/2026 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 24, 2026 Session JESSICA HAMPTON ET AL. v. DANIEL MILLSAPS ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Wilson County No. 2022-CV-199 Charles K. Smith, Chancellor ___________________________________

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 2, 2008 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. QUINTON SANDERS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 00-04327 Joseph B. Dailey, Judge No. W2006-00760-CCA-R3-CD - Filed May 20, 2009 The defendant, Quinton Sanders, was convicted by a Shelby County jury of murde

458 F.Supp.2d 1273 (2006) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Intervenors, United States of America Plaintiff, v. The State of ALABAMA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. CV-83-M-1676-. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama. October 5, 2004. *1275 Alice H. Martin, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Birm

679 So.2d 518 (1996) STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Nigaragua Tehran DEMERY, Appellant. No. 28396-KA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 21, 1996. *519 Indigent Defender Office by Kurt Goins, New Orleans, for Appellant. Richard Ieyoub, Attorney General, Paul Carmouche, District Attorney, Catherine M. Es

289 S.E.2d 860 (1982) STATE of North Carolina v. Charles L. LOYE. No. 8118SC881. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 6, 1982. *861 Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Asst. Atty. Gen. Reginald L. Watkins, Raleigh, for the State. Adam Stein, Appellate Defender by Malcolm R. Hunter, Jr. and Lorinzo Joyner, Asst. Appellate

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON March 4, 2014 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL SMITH Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 10-06590 James M. Lammey, Jr., Judge No. W2013-01190-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 13, 2014 A Shelby County jury found the Defendant, Michael Smith, guilty of aggravated assault and evadi

697 S.W.2d 625 (1985) Eric JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Lloyd Hilton SMITH, Independent Executor of the Estate of Reginald J.C. Hamilton, deceased, Appellee. No. C14-84-524-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). June 20, 1985. Rehearing Denied July 25, 1985. *628 James F. Tyson, Law Offices of Michael J.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree and the jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life. He was sentenced in accordance with the verdict of the jury. At arraignment, with his counsel present, he pleaded not guilty and not guilty by reason of insantiy. After sentence was imposed, he gave notice of appeal. He was found to be indigent and a free transcript was furnished him. Trial counsel was appointed to represent him on appeal. The St

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge. The Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976 provides that, in a civil rights action, “the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.” 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The presumptively “reasonable attorney’s fee” contemplated by § 1988 is the “ ‘product of reasonable hours times a reasonable rate.’ ” Blum v.

The foregoing opinion of Higbee, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. All of the judges concur.