Cases

McCormack, J. **223 In this case we consider whether the admission at a joint trial with a single jury of an unavailable witness's prior testimony about a codefendant's confession violated the defendant's constitutional right to confrontation, notwithstanding the redaction of the defendant's

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan August 4, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan August 4, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered And Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

647 F.Supp.2d 323 (2009) SRI INTERNATIONAL INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., a Georgia corporation, Symantec Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Civ. No. 04-1199-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 20, 2009.

ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This case is before me on a motion (Doc. No. 38) by plaintiff Renee Afshar (Afshar) for leave to file amended complaint. The proposed amended complaint (Doc. No. 38-2) is attached to the motion. One defendant, Jeanne Goche-Horihan (Jeanne), consents to the motion. The remaining three defendants — WMG, L.

Judge ALLARD. Brant Josef Natori Marshall was convicted, following a jury trial, of second-degree failure to register as a sex offender. 1 One of the elements of this crime is that the defendant is, in fact, a convicted sex offender who is required to register as a sex offender under AS 12.63.010.

(2008) SRI INTERNATIONAL INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., a Georgia corporation, Symantec Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and Internet Security Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. Civ. No. 04-1199-SLR. United States District Court, D. Delaware. August 21, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE

CANADY, J., dissenting. In this case, for the first time in the recorded history of our Republic, a court has ruled that state legislators are required to submit to interrogation in a civil case concerning their legislative activities. I dissent from this unprecedented decision — a decision which effectively abrogates the well-established common law legislative privilege and grievously violates the constitution

Affirmed by unpublished opinion. Judge Shedd wrote the opinion, in which Judge Wilkinson and Judge Niemeyer joined. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. SHEDD, Circuit Judge: In these consolidated appeals,1 a group of homeowners who obtained second mortgages on their homes challenge the district court’s dismissal of their claims see

OPINION NICKELL, JUDGE: After entering a conditional guilty plea to an amended charge of second-degree robbery,1 and a charge of possession of a *382handgun by a minor, first offense,2 Marico Perkins is serving a total sentence of eight years. He challenges the Fayette Circuit Cou

JEFFREY S. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Now before the Court are the parties' cross-motions for summary adjudication. Defendants XPO CNW, Inc. and XPO Logistics, Inc. ("Defendants") move for summary adjudication of the second cause of action for intentional interference with contract, the third cause of action for elder abuse, and Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages. Plaintiff Christopher O'Brien, acting as trustee of the

308 F.Supp.2d 65 (2004) Dr. Kuba O. ASSEGAI, Plaintiff, v. BLOOMFIELD BOARD OF EDUCATION, Bloomfield Police Department, Paul Copes, Richard Mulhall, Cindy Lloyd, Eric Coleman, and Matthew Borrelli, Defendants. No. CIV.A. 301CV1304SRU. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. March 4, 2004. *66 Cynthia Renee Jennings, Eroll V

439 S.W.2d 756 (1969) A. R. PEARSON, August G. Strubberg, John Arendall, Ambrose H. Volmert, T. E. Jacobs, Leo E. Parmenter, Bill Obermark, Frank C. Mense, F. Sida, Frank A. Nouss, Renee M. Nouss, and Charles J. Huether, Respondents, v. CITY OF WASHINGTON, a municipal corporation; August G. Strubberg, Mayor of the City of Washington, a municipal corporation; George E. Bocklage, Councilman: Grover H. Crismon, Jr., Councilman: William O. Eckelkamp,

[Cite as State v. Garrett, 2011-Ohio-691.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P. J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon.

PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN delivered the opinion of the court: The defendant, Enice Lyles, Jr., appeals from an order of the circuit court summarily dismissing his second pro se petition for relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 et seq. (West 2000)). A different division of this court subsequently dismissed the defendant’s appeal fo

PRESIDING JUSTICE COHEN delivered the opinion of the court: Petitioner Salvatore Toia appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition to expunge the record of his 1992 arrest for driving while under the influence of alcohol (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a)(1) (West 1992)) (DUI). In denying Toia’s petition, the circuit court conclu

HERNANDEZ, District Judge: *1150Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and a putative class, challenging Oregon's practice of suspending an individual's driver's license for failure to pay "traffic debt."1 More specifically, the six named Plaintiffs, each of whom lives on an extremely limited income

Affirmed as Modified and Opinion Filed March 13, 2014 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01693-CR VINICIO JESUS GARCIA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial Distri

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 116,371 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. STEPHEN A. GENTRY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An aider or abettor can