Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT GRAY, Judge: A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted the. accused, contrary to his pleas, of forgery, wrongful use of marijuana, making a false official statement, and wearing unauthorized military insignia in violation of Articles 132, 112a, 107, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 932, 912a, 907, and 934 (1982 and Supp. V 1987). The approved

RENDERED: AUGUST 9, 2024; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NOS. 2023-CA-1103-MR & 2023-CA-1140-MR COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, EX REL. ATTORNEY GENERAL RUSSELL COLEMAN APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE PHILLIP J. SHEPHERD, JUDGE

445 Pa. Superior Ct. 147 (1995) 664 A.2d 1355 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, v. Antoine BREELAND, Appellant (at 16) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, v. Robert L. COLEMAN, Jr., Appellant (at 27) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, v. Brian L. FREEMAN, Appellant (at 111) Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 6, 1995. Filed August 3, 19

DUHÉ, Circuit Judge: DSC Communications appeals the district court’s refusal to aggregate damages awarded to it by a jury for diversion of corporate opportunity and misappropriation of trade secrets, as well as the district court’s denial of attorneys’ fees. Next Level Communications cross appeals on numerous grounds, alleging that DSC’s claims fail, that certain evidence was im

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-1108 Filed 18 June 2025 Scotland County, No. 22CVS269 JAMES HATCHER, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY R. RODRIGUEZ, Individually, and JEREMY R. RODRIGUEZ, in his capacity as a member of Laurinburg Police Department, and CITY OF LAURINBURG, Defendants. Appeal by defendants from interlocutory order entered 5 September 2023 by Judge Dawn M. Layton in S

14 Cal.App.4th 590 (1993) 18 Cal. Rptr.2d 33 JIM DELANEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SUPERIOR FAST FREIGHT, Defendant and Appellant. Docket Nos. B063458, B066035. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two. March 24, 1993. *592 COUNSEL Thomas F. Coleman, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berline

90 Cal.Rptr.2d 386 (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 766 Hoyt E. HART II, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ALAMEDA COUNTY et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D031358. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. November 3, 1999. Review Denied February 23, 2000.[*] *388 Anthony T. Ditty;

OPINION KEVIN McNULTY, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (ECF No. 57) of Hon. Madeline C. Arleo, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that the Plaintiffs’ motion to remand this action to State court (ECF No. 13-1) be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the R & R will be adopted, and the motion to remand will be granted.

OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. One sitting judge and two aspiring judges from Kentucky wish to exercise their free-speech rights during this and future judicial elections. They claim that the Commonwealth’s Code of Judicial Conduct stands in the way. They are not the first judges to bring this kind of complaint. A growing line of cases grapples with the Sta

75 Cal.Rptr.2d 341 (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 635 ALLIANCE FINANCIAL et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent. No. A076797. Court of Appeal, First District, Division One. June 5, 1998. *342 Richard R. Herzog, Mitchell & Herzog, Palo Alto, for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-01539 (CJN) THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Under the Poultry Products Inspection Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 451 et seq., t

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EMPLOYERS INSURANCE § COMPANY OF WASAU; § No. 27, 2023D HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT § SERVICES, LLC; LIBERTY § Court Below: Superior Court INSURANCE CORPORATION; § of the State of Delaware LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE § INSURANCE COMPANY; LM § C.A. No. S

168 P.3d 273 (2007) 214 Or. App. 633 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marlece Joan WEAVER, aka Marlece Joan Rigby, Defendant-Appellant. 024097MI; A126383. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted January 31, 2007. Decided September 5, 2007. *274 Susan F. Drake, Deputy Publ

750 F.Supp.2d 1171 (2010) Eugene MARSEGLIA and Sharon Lytle, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, and Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. Civil No. 09cv2857 JAH(RBB). United States District Court, S.D. California. November 12, 2010. *1173 Karen S. Spicker, Doan Law Firm LLP, Carlsbad, CA, for Plaintiffs. Andrew James

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REBECCA ROE, by and through her No. 23-2807 parents and next friends, Rachel and Ryan Roe; SEXUALITY AND D.C. No. GENDER ALLIANCE, an association, 1:23-cv-00315- DCN Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION DEBBIE CRITCHFIELD, in her official capacity as Idaho State

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0206p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ ROBERT A. WINTER, JR., ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, │

69 P.3d 895 (2003) Maria Teresa ESCUDE, by her natural parent and guardian, John ESCUDE; John Escude and Maria Laura Escude, individually and as the parents of Maria Teresa Escude, Appellants, v. KING COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 2, d/b/a Evergreen Hospital Medical Center; Susan E. Rutherford, M.D.; Roberta H. deRegt, M.D.; Eastside Maternal Fetal Medicine Associates, P.L.L.C., a professional limited liability corporation; Joseph E. Turner

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RYAN ROE; RACHEL ROE; No. 23-2807 SEXUALITY AND GENDER ALLIANCE, an association, D.C. No. 1:23-cv-00315- Plaintiffs-Appellants, DCN v. ORDER AND DEBBIE CRITCHFIELD, in her AMENDED official capacity as Idaho State OP

2 Cal.4th 571 (1992) 828 P.2d 147 7 Cal. Rptr.2d 245 SAN FRANCISCO TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. S018200. Supreme Court of California. May 4, 1992. *573 COUNSEL

OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. Captain Bishop’s fourteen year career as an officer in the Army was involuntarily terminated because of an alleged act of “moral and professional dereliction,” to wit, falsification of a test score on an application to graduate school. Because the court finds that the evidence in support of the accusation was insubstantial, plaintiff’s pending cross-motion for summary judgment is