Cases

Case: 24-1072 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 10/02/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REX MEDICAL, L.P., Plaintiff-Appellant v. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC., INTUITIVE SURGICAL HOLDINGS, LLC, Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2

PAINTER, Judge. | ¶ Defendant-Appellant, John M. Clark, appeals the trial court’s ruling ordering certain property owned in indivisión with Plaintiff, Crosstex, LIG, L.L.C. (Crosstex) to be partitioned by licitation. Finding that the appeal is moot, we dismiss it. FACTS In 1959, John and Mary Clark bought a tract of land in Natchitoches Parish, Louisiana. John Clark died intestate i

[Cite as Rex v. Rex, 2016-Ohio-5788.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JUDGES: THOMAS REX : Hon. John W. Wise, P.J. : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Plaintiff-Appellant : Hon.

Case: 22-50405 Document: 00516885530 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED Septem

Spina, J. A Norfolk County grand jury indicted the defendant, John Rex, on seven counts of possession of child pornography, G. L. c. 272, § 29C, and seven counts of being a habitual offender, G. L. c. 279, § 25. 1 Relying on Commonwealth v. McCarthy,

792 F.Supp.2d 1242 (2011) ORIGINAL REX, L.L.C., an Oklahoma limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. BEAUTIFUL BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, Rex's Franchise System, LLC, Berry Chic-A-Lo, LLC, Big Rex, LLC, and Coney Beacha, Inc., Defendants. Case No. 10-CV-424-GKF-FHM. United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma. May 27, 2011. *1243

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-2357 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REX HAMMOND, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Nor

11‐5199 Rex v. Martinez 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2012 6 7 (Argued: December 11, 2012 Decided: May 22, 2015) 8 9 Docket No. 11‐5199‐c

Ripple, Circuit Judge. In June 2017, a federal grand jury indicted Rex Hopper on one count of conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B), 846 and

11‐5199 Rex v. Martinez 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2012 6 7 (Argued: December 11, 2012 Decided: May 22, 2015) 8 9 Docket No. 11‐5199‐c

ORDER AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER Blackburn, J. The matter before me is plaintiffs Complaint [# l],1 filed December 21, 2012, seeking review of the Commissioner’s decision denying plaintiffs claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401, et seq. I have jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s final decision under 42 U.

754 F.Supp.2d 616 (2010) REX MEDICAL L.P., Petitioner, v. ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS (US), INC., Respondent. No. 10 Civ. 8746(CM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 1, 2010. *618 Joshua H. Epstein, Alan Stuart Gruber, Michael B. Roth, Sorinroyercooper LLC, New York, NY, for Petitioner. DECISION

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00441-CV ___________________________ JAMES DONALD TATE AND MICHAEL CUFFIA, Appellants V. REX HANSEN, Appellee On Appeal from the 141st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 141-332119-22

11-5199 REX V. MARTINEZ DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge, dissenting: 1 New York’s Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, citing his sole control over the 2 issuance of custom license plates in the State of New York, deems a proposed 3 custom plate depicting a sun and two smiling children, and bearing the words, 4 “Choose Life,” to be “patently offensive,” and thus prohibited under New York law. 5 In its desire to uphold this surprising result, the majority

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed January 30, 2024 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01314-CV REX PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS, LLC, Appellant V. SULZER CHEMTECH USA, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

GRIFFIS, J., CONCURRING IN PART AND DISSENTING IN PART: ¶40. This interlocutory appeal considers whether the circuit court correctly granted the motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Anheuser-Busch and the Mitchell Companies. 4 ¶41. As to Anheuser-Busch, th

OPINION LASNIK, District Judge. Rex Bothell seeks overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of forty per week and other damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and California state law. Appellee Phase Metrics, Inc., argues that Bothell is an exempt “administrative” employee under both fe

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 18-2576 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REX A. HOPPER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Respondent, ) OPINION ) v. ) WD82619 Consolidated with ) WD82620 MICHAEL L. OGLESBY, ) Appellant. ) FILED: JANUARY 26, 2021

MAYER, Circuit Judge. Rex Service Corporation (“Rex”) appeals the judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, dismissing its post-award bid protest for lack of jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2002). * Rex Serv. Corp. v. United States, No. 05-CV-386 (Fed. Cl. June 6