Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Reynolds Intl v. Thompson”
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Dist. Ct.public domain
138 Nev., Advance Opinion 55 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, No. 83724 A FOREIGN CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR- BY-MERGER TO LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY AND AS : SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO THE P L E UNITED STATES TOBACCO BUSINESS OF BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION, WHICH IS THE SUCCESSOR-BY-MERGER TO THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; A
Thompson v. Witherspoonpublic domain
12 A.3d 685 (2011) 197 Md. App. 69 Nancy Lee Kathryn THOMPSON, et al. v. Gordon WITHERSPOON, et al. No. 00012, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. February 1, 2011. *687 Kathleen H. Anderson & David F. Mister (Mister, Winter & Bartlett, LLC, on the brief), Timonium, MD, for
Reynolds & Reynolds Co. v. Goldsmith Motor Corp.public domain
—In an action, inter alia, to recover money due under a contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated April 11, 1997, as stayed its counterclaims and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration on the counterclaims. Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Cour
Brock v. Thompsonpublic domain
948 P.2d 279 (1997) 1997 OK 127 John A. BROCK, George Kaiser, David Rainbolt, Christine F. Fletcher, Bob Howell, Citizens Against Lawsuit Abuse, Inc., Petitioners, v. The Honorable Donald D. THOMPSON, Judge of the District Court of Creek County, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District, Respondent, and Jessie Huff Durham, an individual, and Beau Williams, an individual, Real Parties in Interest. No. 88912.
Local 863 Intl. Broth v. Jersey Coast Egg Prodpublic domain
773 F.2d 530 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2505, 103 Lab.Cas. P 11,660 LOCAL 863 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS,CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICAand Douglas Samuels, Appellants,v.JERSEY COAST EGG PRODUCERS, INC., a corporation of the Stateof Delaware, Appellee. No. 84-5869. United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.
Phillip Morris Usa Inc. v. Dist. Ct. (Rowan)public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., A FOREIGN No. 84805 CORPORATION, Petitioner, V5. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FLED COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ~ IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AUG 11 2022 AND THE HONORABLE VERONICA BARISICH, DISTRICT JUDGE, CLC OF S)PREME COURT Respondents, BALM and DOLLY ROWAN, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, AS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF NOREEN THOMPSON; NAVONA COLLISON, AS AN INDIVIDUAL; RUSSELL THOMPSON, AS AN INDIVIDUAL; R.J.
Pitzer v. Wilmingtonpublic domain
[Cite as Pitzer v. Wilmington, 2024-Ohio-5141.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO CLINTON COUNTY GREG PITZER, : CASE NO. CA2024-02-002 Appellant, : OPINION
Matter of Rodriguez v. American Bridge Co.public domain
Matter of Rodriguez v American Bridge Co. (2023 NY Slip Op 00909) Matter of Rodriguez v American Bridge Co. 2023 NY Slip Op 00909 Decided on February 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bu
Brown v. Statepublic domain
BLACKWELL, Justice, concurring. It is no ground for a plea in abatement that a true bill of indictment was returned by grand jurors disqualified propter affectum, and this settled principle has been a part of our common law for more than a century. See, e.g., Fisher v. State, 93 Ga. 309, 309-310 (20 SE 329) (1893); Lascelles v. State, 90 Ga. 347, 372-375 (3) (16 SE 945) (1892); Williams v.
Marcellus Energy Servs. LLC v Tompkins Ins. Agencies, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 02980) Marcellus Energy Servs. LLC v Tompkins Ins. Agencies, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 02980 Decided on May 15, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by Ne
Duke v. Statepublic domain
306 Ga. 171 FINAL COPY S19M0969. DUKE v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. On April 12, 2017, Ryan Alexander Duke was indicted for malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, burglary, and concealing the death of another in connection with the October 23, 2005, death of Tara Grinstead. Duke was initially provided counsel through the Tifton Judicial Circuit Public Defender’s office, but, in September 2018, he obtained pro bono private counsel. The case was set
Sakab Saudi Holding Company v. Aljabripublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1052 SAKAB SAUDI HOLDING COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SAAD KHALID S. ALJABRI; KHALID SAAD KHALID ALJABRI; MOHAMMED SAAD KH ALJABRI; NEW EAST (US) INC.; NEW EAST 804 805 LLC; and NEW EAST BACK BAY LLC, Defendants, Appellees, UNITED STATES,
All Metro Health Care Services, Inc. v. Edwardspublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Marcy S. Friedman, J. In this action, plaintiffs All Metro Health Care Services, Inc. (AMHC) and the 1818 Mezzanine Fund II, L.P. (1818 Fund) seek damages for defendants’ alleged fraud in connection with the sale to AMHC of All Metro Aids, Inc. (All Metro Aids), a corporation engaged in the business of home health care. Plaintiffs AMHC and 1818 Fund move to discontinue the action so t
Eden v. Eden (In re Eden)public domain
Mary Grace Diehl, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss filed by Rhonda T. Eden ("Defendant") on August 15, 2017 (the "Motion"). (Docket No. 4). Chris Eden ("Plaintiff") filed Plaintiff's Opposition to Debtor's Motion to Dismiss on August 28, 2017 (the "Response"). (Docket No. 6). Plaintiff filed a complaint (Docket No. 1) (the "Complaint"), objecting to Defendant's discharge and th
JUSTICE LEAPHART delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 Citizens Awareness Network, Women’s Voices for the Environment, and Clark Fork Coalition (collectively, “Conservation Groups”) appeal the order of the District Court for the Twentieth Judicial District, Sanders County, denying their motion for summary judgment and upholding the decision of the Montana Board of
Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. Kobachpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 124,130 HODES & NAUSER, MDS, P.A.; and TRACI LYNN NAUSER, M.D., Appellees, v. KRIS KOBACH, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Kansas; and STEPHEN M
Carolina Tobacco Co. v. Bakerpublic domain
670 S.E.2d 811 (2008) CAROLINA TOBACCO COMPANY v. BAKER. No. A08A1045. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 18, 2008. Reconsideration Denied December 11, 2008. Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, James Darren Summerville, Steven Jason Rosenwasser, Atlanta, for Appellant. Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Isaac Byrd, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sidney R. Bar
Safranek v. Copart, Inc.public domain
379 F.Supp.2d 927 (2005) Denise A. SAFRANEK Plaintiff, v. COPART, INC., Defendant. No. 05 C 1015. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 14, 2005. *928 Terence J. Moran, Gessler Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Brian J. Gold, Jessica Kaye Benenson, Sidley A
Maffei v. Allstate California Insurancepublic domain
412 F.Supp.2d 1049 (2006) Don MAFFEI, Jr.; Shelly Maffei; Rodney New; Judith Ann New; Mike Lusk; Carol Ann Lusk; John Brickerhoff, Plaintiffs, v. ALLSTATE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COMPANY; Allstate Insurance Company; Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company; Allstate Life Insurance Company; and Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. No. 02:05CV2197GEB-PAN. United States District Court, E.D. Californ
Citizens Awareness v. DEQpublic domain
DA 09-0070 January 26 2010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2010 MT 10 CITIZENS AWARENESS NETWORK, WOMEN’S VOICES FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, and CLARK FORK COALITION, Petitioners and Appellants, v. MONTANA BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, Respondent and Appellees, and MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMEN