Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rhonda W. Branch and Connie R. Branch”
Loretta C. Biggs, United District Court Judge *397Before the Court are three motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint. The first is brought by the Beaufort County Board of Elections, its Chairman, Secretary, Director, and a Member of the Board, each named in their official capacities (collectively "Beaufort Defendants"), (ECF No. 56); the second by the Cumberland County
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Clark v. APAC Mid-South, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION HARWELL G. DAVIS, III, United States Magistrate Judge. On December 11, 2009, plaintiff Jeffery A. Clark, III, (“Clark”) an African-American, initiated this civil action with a two-count complaint filed in the Northern District of Alabama against defendant APAC Mid-South, Inc., (“APAC”) alleging race discrimination and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“Section 1981”
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
Thomasena Adams v. Governor McMasterpublic domain
The Supreme Court of South Carolina Dr. Thomasena Adams, Rhonda Polin, Shaun Thacker, Orangeburg County School District, Sherry East, and the South Carolina Education Association, Petitioners, v. Governor Henry McMaster, Palmetto Promise Institute, South Carolina Office of the Treasurer, and South Carolina Department of Administration, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2020-001069
Thomasena Adams v. Governor McMasterpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Dr. Thomasena Adams, Rhonda Polin, Shaun Thacker, Orangeburg County School District, Sherry East, and the South Carolina Education Association, Petitioners, v. Governor Henry McMaster, Palmetto Promise Institute, South Carolina Office of the Treasurer, and South Carolina Department of Administration, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2020-001069 ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Opinion No. 28000
Thomasena Adams v. Governor McMasterpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Dr. Thomasena Adams, Rhonda Polin, Shaun Thacker, Orangeburg County School District, Sherry East, and the South Carolina Education Association, Petitioners, v. Governor Henry McMaster, Palmetto Promise Institute, South Carolina Office of the Treasurer, and South Carolina Department of Administration, Respondents. Appellate Case No. 2020-001069 ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Opinion No. 28000
Conti v. Fid. Bank (In re NC & VA Warranty Co.)public domain
BENJAMIN A. KAHN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This Adversary Proceeding is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support, ECF No. 178 ("Fidelity's Brief"), filed by Defendant Fidelity Bank ("Fidelity") and the Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 184 ("Dealers' Motion for Summary Judgment"), filed by Defendant Dealers Assurance Company ("Dealers") (collectively, the "Motions for Summary Judgment"
Bartlett v. Baasiripublic domain
21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG
Jackson v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 14-397L, 15-194L (Filed: November 20, 2017) ***************************** * Partial Summary Judgment; GLORIA J. JACKSON, et al., * Class Action; Fifth Amendment *
In re KBR, Inc.public domain
FLOYD, Circuit Judge: *253The Constitution entrusts the President and Congress, not the courts, with the power to resolve political questions. See Japan Whaling Ass'n v. Am. Cetacean Soc'y , 478 U.S. 221, 230, <
Alan Metzgar v. KBR, Inc.public domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1960 In re: KBR, INC., Burn Pit Litigation. ------------------------------ ALAN METZGAR, RWT 09-744; PAUL PARKER, and all others similarly situated: RWT 09-744; JOSHUA ELLER, RWT 09-2748; JOANNE OCHS, RWT 09-2747; MELISSA OCHS, RWT 09-2747; JAMES MORGAN, RWT 09-2747; DAVID NEWTON, RWT
Griego v. Oliverpublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'05- 16:00:53 2014.01.23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2014
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Abshirepublic domain
OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
SACK, Circuit Judge: In this litigation, judgment creditors of the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) attempt to execute on $1.68 billion in bond proceeds allegedly owned by Iran’s central bank. The Supreme Court has instructed that in an execution proceeding concerning a foreign sovereign’s assets, any defense predicated on foreign sovereign immunity must rise or fall on the text of the Foreign Sovereign
Peterson v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
515 F.Supp.2d 25 (2007) Deborah D. PETERSON, Personal Representative of the Estate of James C. Knipple (Dec.), et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 01-2094 (RCL), 01-2684(RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 7, 2007. *26
Griego v. Oliverpublic domain
OPINION CHÁVEZ, Justice. {1} “All persons are born equally free, and have certain natural, inherent and inalienable rights, among which are the rights of enjoying and defending life and liberty, of acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of seeking and obtaining safety and happiness.” N.M. Const, art