Cases

18‐2321‐cv Rich v. Fox News Network, LLC IN THE United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________ AUGUST TERM, 2018 ARGUED: FEBRUARY 4, 2019 DECIDED: SEPTEMBER 13, 2019 No. 18‐2321‐cv

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Joel and Mary Rich bring this action against Defendants Fox News Network, LLC, Fox News reporter Malia Zimmerman (together with Fox News, the "Fox Defendants"), and Fox News contributor Ed Butowsky asserting claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED") and for aiding and abetting and conspiring to intentionally inflict emotional distress on Plaintiffs. (

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE NEW ENTERPRISE ASSOCIATES 14, ) L.P., NEA VENTURES 2014, L.P., ) NEA:SEED II, LLC, and CORE ) CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-0406-JTL ) GEORGE S. RICH, SR., DAVID

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE FOX CORPORATION DERIVATIVE CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION C.A. No. 2023-0418-JTL MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Date Submitted: November 22, 2024 Date Decided: December 27, 2024 Joel Friedlander, Jeffrey M. Gorris, Christopher M. Foulds, FRIEDLANDER & GORRIS, P.A., Wilmington, Delawa

THOMAS, Chief Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The key issue in this case is whether Actmedia Inc. v. Stroh, 830 F.2d 957 (9th Cir. 1986), is compatible with subsequent Supreme Court authority addressing commercial speech, culminating with Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc., 564 U.S. 552, 131 S.Ct. 2653, 180 L.Ed.2d 544 (2011). Sorrell held that content-based restrictions on truth

GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge *449Plaintiff Rod Wheeler brings this action asserting claims for defamation per se and, in the alternative, defamation and libel per quod , against Defendant Fox News Network LLC ("Fox News"), its parent company, Defendant Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. ("21st Century Fox" and, with Fox News, "Fox"), Fox

IN CHAMBERS PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are a Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 41) and a Motion to Strike Expert Report (Docket No. 46) filed by plaintiffs and counterdefendants Twentieth Century Fox Television, a division of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, and Fox Broadcasting Company (collectively “Fox” or “Plaintiffs”). Defendant and counterclaimant Empi

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: This dispute over the concept for a television show presents the question of the extent to which the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., preempts contract claims involving copyrightable property. Plaintiffs-Appellants Forest Park Pictures, Hayden Christensen, and Tove Christensen (collectively, “Forest Park”) developed

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MOVORA LLC (f/k/a OSSIUM ) NEWCO LLC); OSSIUM BIDCO, LLC; ) and VETERINARY ORTHOPEDIC ) IMPLANTS, LLC (f/k/a VETERINARY ) ORTHOPEDICS IMPLANTS, INC.), ) ) Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, ) ) v. )

723 F.Supp.2d 357 (2010) Debra FELDMAN, Plaintiff, v. TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, News Corporation, NBC Universal, Inc., Kevin Falls, Shonda Rimes, Touchstone Television Productions, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Mark Gordon, Greg Berlanti, Marc Guggenheim, Walt Disney Company, United Talent Agency, Mark Korman, and Endeavor, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-10714. United States Dis

KEARNEY, District Judge A television network advertising a show purporting to describe the "true" story of disputed historical events must be careful to not misrepresent the specifics of its show so as to mislead the consumer concerning its product. Summarizing an argument or opinion offered within the show is different than a statement made about a show as a product such as its length, characters or producers. Whe

OPINION AND ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge: “Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electñc light the most efficient policeman. ”1 I. INTRODUCTION The parties in this litigation have starkly different viewpoints about the wisdom and legitimacy of Secure Communities, which, as an aspect of national im

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1421C Filed: April 3, 2020 Redacted Version Issued for Publication: April 26, 20201 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * HARMONIA HOLDINGS GROUP, * LLC, * * Protestor, *

REYNA, Circuit Judge. Unwired Planet, LLC (“Unwired”) appeals from the final written decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) No. 2014-00036 and Covered Business Method'(“CBM”) Patent Review No. 2014-00005. Google Inc. v. Unwired, Planet, LLC, IPR2014-00036, 2015 WL 1478653 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 30

MICHAEL E. WILES, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The chapter 7 trustee of Direct Access Partners, LLC ("DA Partners") seeks to recover more than five million dollars of payments received by defendants James Craig and Joseph De Meneses between 2009 and 2013. The Trustee contends that the payments were received directly or indirectly from DA Partners; that DA Partners transferred funds with an actual intent to hinder, delay or defra

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL [Re: ECF 334] BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge Plaintiff - Mathew Enterprise, Inc., a Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Ram (“CJDR”) dealer operating at Stevens Creek CJDR (“Stevens Creek”) brought this action alleging that Defendant Chrysler Group LLC (“Chrysler”) offered incentive payments to other CJDR dealers in Northern Californ

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED FOR NEW T

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL