Cases

403 Pa. Superior Ct. 492 (1991) 589 A.2d 718 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Richard CORNISH. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 11, 1990. Filed April 8, 1991. *493 Harriet R. Brumberg, Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, for Com., appellant. Jeffrey P. Shender, Philadelphia, f

Argued Before: Barbera, C.J. Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Hotten, Getty, JJ. Greene, J. **521 *1238 In this case, we consider under what circumstances a defendant has

715 F.Supp.2d 56 (2010) Cornell D.M. Judge CORNISH, Plaintiff, v. Jon DUDAS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1719 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. June 4, 2010. *58 Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, Washington, DC, pro se. William Mark Nebeker, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defenda

813 F.Supp.2d 147 (2011) Cornell D.M. Judge CORNISH, Plaintiff, v. Jon DUDAS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1719 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 27, 2011. Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, Washington, DC, Pro se. William Mark Nebeker, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM

209 Cal.App.3d 467 (1989) 257 Cal. Rptr. 383 ROBERT L. CORNISH, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, Respondent; CAPITAL BOND & INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. E005996. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two. April 6, 1989. *470 CO

WILLIAMSON, J., This matter comes before the court on the summary judgment motion of defendant Darell T. Covington, M.D. (“defendant”). The matter involves alleged medical malpractice claims *233of the plaintiffs against the defendants Dr. Covington and Richard M. Cornish, M.D., that caused the death of Richard C. White (“decedent”). Defendant Covington contends

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish moves for reconsideration of the August 15, 2012 memorandum opinion and order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Cornish reargues legal arguments raised and rejected in the memorandum opinion and order, argues that he has new claims and evidence, and asserts that the court clear

(2008) Cornell D.M. Judge CORNISH, Plaintiff, v. Jon DUDAS, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1719 (RWR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 25, 2008. MEMORANDUM ORDER RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish, an attorney who was previously registered to prac

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge. Pro se plaintiff Cornell Cornish brings claims against the United States of America, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), and then-USPTO employees Jon Doll, Harry I. Moatz, and James Toupin, each of whom is sued in his official and individual capacities, arising from the USPTO’

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________ ) CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-1719 (RWR) ) JON DUDAS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-0703 Filed February 20, 2019 IN RE MARRIAGE OF RICHARD ALBERT CORNISH III AND SHPRESA THAQI-CORNISH Upon the Petition of RICHARD ALBERT CORNISH III, Petitioner-Appellee, And Concerning SHPRESA THAQI-CORNISH, Respondent-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, K

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________ ) CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 07-1719 (RWR) ) JON DUDAS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________ ) CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-797 (RWR) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) et al., ) ) Defen

471 Pa. 256 (1977) 370 A.2d 291 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Clarence CORNISH, Appellant (two cases). Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted October 20, 1975. Decided February 28, 1977. *257 *258 *259 Richard R. Lunenfeld, Phila

KRAVITZ, Associate Judge: The Shadow Room nightclub challenges a decision of the District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board requiring the club to retain a reimbursable Metropolitan Police Department detail as a condition of the renewal of its liquor license. Shadow Room contends that the Board misallocated the burden of proof and erroneously admitted hearsay and unqua

PER CURIAM. Appellant Audra Sommers, plaintiff below, also known as Timothy Cornish, appeals from an order of the district court 1 entering summary judgment in favor of the defendant below, Budget Marketing, Incorporated. We affirm. Sommers claims to be a “female with the anatomical body of a ma

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: Harold Cornish appeals the dismissal, for failure to state a claim, of his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against his former employer and several of its employees for retaliatory discharge, violative of the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Fed. R. Crv. P. 12(b)(6). As alleged in his complaint: Cornish was employed as a correctional officer

968 P.2d 606 (1998) 192 Ariz. 533 STATE of Arizona, Respondent, v. James CORNISH, Petitioner. No. 1 CA-CR 96-0922-PR. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. May 26, 1998. As Amended June 17, 1998. Review Denied December 7, 1998. *607 Richard M. Romley, Mari

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00247-CR ___________________________ THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant V. RICHARD OPARE, Appellee On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 3 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1470887 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Meier and Kerr, JJ. Opinion on Rehearing by Chief Justice Sudderth

242 P.3d 1 (2010) CORNISH COLLEGE OF THE ARTS, a Washington public benefit corporation, Respondent, v. 1000 VIRGINIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Washington limited partnership; One Thousand Virginia, a general partnership; and Donn Etherington, Jr., an individual, Appellants. Nos. 63790-8-I, 63792-4-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. October 25, 2010.