Cases

02/09/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 19, 2021 Session RICHARD E. MACK, ET AL. v. CABLE EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004954-14 Felicia Corbin Johnson, Judge

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE RICHARD MACK and CASIMIRA MACK, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0588-BWD ) HERON BAY ASSOCIATES, LLC, a ) Delaware Limited Liability Company, and LC ) HOMES DE, INC. d/b/a LC HOMES,

08/31/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 21, 2018 Session RICHARD E. MACK ET AL. v. COMCAST CORPORATION ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004954-14 Felicia Corbin Johnson, Judge ___________________________________

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 421 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-23-691 RICHARD MACK Opinion Delivered September 10, 2025 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS COUNTY V. CIRCUIT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRI

15 N.Y.3d 835 (2010) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONALD MACK, Appellant. No. 208 SSM 42 Court of Appeals of New York. Decided September 21, 2010. Muldoon & Getz, Rochester (Gary Muldoon of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens (Merri Turk Lasky of counsel), for respond

SUMMARY ORDER ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and hereby is AFFIRMED. Petitioner-Appellant Jerome Mack appeals from a July 27, 2010 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Swain, J.) denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his petition, Mack

ROBERTS, J. The appellant, Allen Mack, was tried by jury and convicted of one count of kidnapping and one count of felony battery as a repeat offender. The appellant raises several issues on appeal, one of which warrants reversal. The appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for mistrial after a State witness made a constitutionally impermissible comment upon his right to remain silent. We agree and

ORDER PER CURIAM. Angela Mack, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (Appellant), appeals from the trial court’s order denying her Amended Motion for Class Certification. 'We have'reviéwed the briéfs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant class certification. An extended opinion would have no pr

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.BACKGROUND...............................................•..........335 II.LEGAL STANDARD ....................................................336 A. Summary Judgment Standard.........................................336 B. The Applicable Law (Maritime Law)......

274 F.2d 582 Richard A. MACK, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.Thurman A. WHITESIDE, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 15322. No. 15323. United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. Argued September 24, 1959. Decided September 29, 1959.

Opinion filed November 29, 2018 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ Nos. 11-18-00242-CR, 11-18-00243-CR, 11-18-00244-CR, & 11-18-00245-CR __________ RICHARD DAVID MACK, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 266th Distr

JUSTICE BURKE delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant Terrance Mack appeals from an order of the circuit court summarily dismissing his “Motion for Reconsideration of Denial of Postconviction Petition/Successive Petition for Relief’ brought pursuant to the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (Act) (725 ILCS 5/122 — 1 et seq. (West

75 P.3d 803 (2003) Daryl Linnie MACK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent. No. 40164. Supreme Court of Nevada. September 8, 2003. Michael R. Specchio, Public Defender, and John Reese Petty, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Washoe County, for Appellant. Brian Sandoval, Attorney General, Carson City; Richard A. Gammick, District Attorney, and Gary H. Hat

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GERTNER, District Judge. Plaintiff Katrina Mack (“Plaintiff” or “Mack”) and four potential intervenors (“Plaintiffs”) seek to represent a class of women subjected to strip-searches and visual body cavity inspections during pre-arraignment detention at the Suffolk County jail. The searches were not episodic. They were conducted pursuant to an official policy of the Suffolk County Sheriff’

MEMORANDUM ** Richard Mack (“Mack”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees. Arizona’s general defamation rule provides that a defamation action accrues and the statute of limitations begins to run upon publication. Boatman v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc., 168 Ariz. 207, 812 P.2d 1025, 1031 (1990). Arizona applies the discovery rule if “the alleged defamatory

PER CURIAM: This case comes before us by order of the United States Supreme Court, which has vacated the judgment of this Court as to appellant Roy Mack West, and remanded the case for our reconsideration in light of Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985(1999). See United States v. West, 142 F.3d 1408

221 P.3d 194 (2009) 2009 UT 47 Richard W. MACK, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. UTAH STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF SECURITIES, Defendant and Appellant. No. 20070301. Supreme Court of Utah. July 31, 2009. *196 Clark K. Taylor, Stephen K. Christiansen, Sam Meziani, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff. <

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR ACQUITTAL AND FOR A NEW TRIAL GADOLA, District Judge. On June 8, 1994, a jury convicted defendant Johnny Bernard Mack of three drug-related offenses. On June 17,1994, the court entered a stipulated order extending the time for filing motions to July 15, 1994. On July 15, 1994, defendant filed the instant motion for a judgment of acquittal pursuant

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HUYETT, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND Marvin and Sandra Scribner (“Plaintiffs”) commenced this personal injury action against Defendant Mack Trucks, Inc. (“Mack Trucks”). Plaintiffs allege that, when on *217Mack Trucks’ premises, Marvin Scribner slipped on oil which had been negligently s

hWILLIAMS, Judge. The defendants, Claryene Mack and Henry Mack, were each charged by bill of information with two counts of felony theft, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:67. Prior to trial, the defendants filed a motion to quash the bill of information, alleging that the time period in which to commence trial had expired. The district court granted defendants’ motion to quash. The state appeals. For the following reasons, we reve