Cases

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 03, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16A1129. RICHARD TURNER, JR. v. EASLAN ACKERMAN EAST WEST. Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

In the Matter of DISCIPLINE OF Richard D. ACKERMAN.Richard D. Ackerman, of Menifee, California, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred *419from the practice of law in this Court.

Disbarment order entered.

Tucker, Richard T., J. This is a tort suit arising out of statements that Assumption College’s (“Assumption’s”) athletic director Theodore Paulauskas (“Paulauskas”) made regarding the resignation of Assumption men’s basketball coach, Thomas Ackerman (“Ackerman”). Ackerman filed a complaint against Paulauskas and Assumption (“the defendants”), alleging defamation, breach of contract, and interference with a contractual relationshi

OPINION OF THE COURT Jack M. Battaglia, J. *276With this action, filed on her behalf by attorney William Pager, Esq., plaintiff Jemma B. Moore seeks damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained in an automobile accident on December 11, 2006. Exactly two years later, on December 11, 2008, plaintiff retained the law firm of Peters, Berger, Koshel

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I admire the majority’s deft circumnavigation of serious errors of fact and law in pursuit of an ultimately defensible result. I write separately because the district court’s errors were so many and of such significance that I cannot share the majority’s confidence that they did not contribute to that result. More importantly, I believe that leaving those e

865 A.2d 1120 (2004) 2004 VT 112 William M. BOWMAN, III v. James and Renee ACKERMAN, Gary and Lindsay Ryan, Richard Schattman and Ruth Dennis, Lawrence and Barbara Young. No. 03-404. Supreme Court of Vermont. October 29, 2004. Present: DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND, REIBER, JJ., and FREDERIC W. ALLEN, C.J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.

227 P.3d 744 (2010) 233 Or. App. 511 Kenneth ACKERMAN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. OHSU MEDICAL GROUP, George West, and Oregon Health and Science University, Defendants-Appellants, and Jonathan Carlson, Defendant. 040808851; A134282. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted on March 18, 2009. Decided February 10, 2010.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Richard Ackerman, Irene Ackerman and Milton Ackerman appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated October 17, 1988, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the cross mot

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by Terry C. Ackerman from a June 5, 1992, order of the Circuit Court of Ohio County which set aside a defense verdict in favor of the Appellant and granted the Appellees a' new trial. The Appellant contends that the lower court’s decision to grant a new trial was in error. We agree, and accordingly reverse the decision of the circuit court and reinstate the original jury verdict.

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: In an earlier appeal, we affirmed an order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment (McMichaels v Bechhoefer, 214 AD2d 950). We agreed with Supreme Court that defendant’s July 17, 1993 letter to the United States Drug Enforcement Agency is afforded a qualified privilege (see, Toker v Pollack, 44 NY2d 211, 220; <

ORDER ON MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM AUTOMATIC STAY JOHN E. WAITES, Bankruptcy Judge. This matter came before the Court on the motion of Joy M. Ackerman (“Mrs. Acker-man”) for relief from the automatic stay. Mrs. Ackerman sought relief from the stay in order to prosecute an action seeking equitable apportionment of the marital property in the Family Court of the State of South Carolina, Colleton Count

Tom, J. (concurring). The motion court’s orders should be affirmed in their denial of class certification for the “global” (non-New York residents) subclass, but reversed to the extent that the class consists of New York residents. While I concur with Justice Mazzarelli’s result, I conclude that additional factors, particularly the burden imposed on New York courts in the absence of a demonstrable New York interest, support t

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

HENRY, Circuit Judge. Coca-Cola Enterprises (Coca-Cola) appeals the district court’s decision that advanced sales representatives and account managers employed by the company are entitled to overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. 1 We conclude that these employees are ex

84 N.Y.2d 535 (1994) 644 N.E.2d 1009 620 N.Y.S.2d 318 Carolyn Ackerman et al., Respondents, v. Price Waterhouse, Appellant. (And One Other Action and a Third-Party Action.) Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued October 27, 1994. Decided December 6, 1994. Debevoise & Plimpton, New York City (David W.

FRIEDMAN, Judge. Carbon County and Carbon County Board of Assessments (together, Appellants) appeal from two orders of the Court of Common Pleas of Carbon County (trial court); a September 9, 1996 order concluding that Appellants’ assessment of properties is defective because of a lack of uniformity, and a January 10, 1997 order directing Appellants to conduct a county-wide reassessment of all properties within Carbon County

55 F.3d 117 63 USLW 2804, 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1388,Pens. Plan Guide P 23908P Valerie J. ACKERMAN, Chester O. Adams, Anne E. Alexander,Barry M. Allmond, Helen L. Anders, Marlene Archey, Mary H.Auker, Frances C. Balestino, Pauline Balestino, Thomas L.Ballos, Barney W. Barndollar, Elaine Barnes, Bertha L.Barnhill, James E. Becker, Linda Becker, Mark A. Becker,Katherine L. Bem, William F. Black

FISHER, Associate Judge: Appellants Abdelilah Abdelrhman and Iron Cab, Inc., challenge the dismissal of their lawsuit arising from a dispute over a lease of commercial property. They also claim that they were wrongfully evicted from the property. We disagree and affirm the judgments. I. BACKGROUND The present dispute arose from a commercial lease of property located at 1810 Bladensburg

380 N.W.2d 922 (1986) STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Richard Clarence ACKERMAN, Appellant. No. C2-85-1248. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. February 11, 1986. *923 Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Harris I. Darling, Nobles Co. Atty., Kenneth J. Kohler, Asst. Nobles Co. Atty., Worthington, for respondent. Mi