Cases

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

796 F.Supp. 925 (1992) NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY CO., Plaintiff, v. ACCIDENT & CASUALTY INS. CO. OF WINTERTHUR, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-0344-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. May 15, 1992. *926 W. Fain Rutherford, Phillip D. Payne, IV, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Va.

796 F.Supp. 929 (1992) NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY CO., Plaintiff, v. ACCIDENT & CASUALTY INS. CO. OF WINTERTHUR, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-0344-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division. May 15, 1992. *930 W. Fain Rutherford, Phillip D. Payne, IV, Woods, Rogers & Hazlegrove, Roanoke, Va.

781 N.E.2d 713 (2003) Angelique BYRD, Brent Cuniffe, Janice Dallas, Della Davis, Donald Day, James Dexter, Terri Emsing, Patricia Everly, Sue Hochstetler, Norma Murphy, Thomas Perkins, Mildred Weidenhaupt, and Mark Zollman, Appellants-Defendants, v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 62 (AFSCME), Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A02-0202-CV-165. Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Affirmed in part, appeal dismissed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior Judge CHAPMAN joined. OPINION WIDENER, Circuit Judge: This dispute arises out of several excess liability insurance policies purchased by Norfolk and Western Railway and is before us on an interlocutory appeal from the district court’s order

41 F.3d 928 NORFOLK & WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.ACCIDENT & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY OF WINTERTHUR;Insurance Company of Florida; Southern American InsuranceCompany; Northwestern National Insurance Company ofMilwaukee; Bellefonte Insurance Company; California UnionInsurance Company; The Insurance Company of North America;Employers Insurance of Wausau; American ReinsuranceCompany; Y

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I regret that I am unable to join in Judge Kennedy’s thoughtful, comprehensive majority opinion. I am unable to do so because in my view the ICC has erroneously interpreted and applied the Panama Canal Act, 49 U.S.C. § 11321 (1982) (the “Act”), so as to approve for the first time during the seventy-three year history of the Act the acquisition by a railroad of a barge-line.<

432 F.Supp. 274 (1977) In re FTC CORPORATE PATTERNS REPORT LITIGATION. In re FTC LINE OF BUSINESS REPORT LITIGATION. Misc. Nos. 76-0126, 76-0127. United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 21, 1977. *275 *276 Edward T. Tait, Lee A. Rau, John M. Wood, Stuart M. Gerson, and Thomas H

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state

834 F.Supp. 1437 (1993) Edward J. CARLOUGH, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., et al., Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs, v. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Third Party Defendants. Civ. A. No. 93-0215. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 6, 1993.

181 F.Supp. 911 (1960) SECURITY-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, as Executor of the Estate of Alice C. D. Riley, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. No. 992-59-Y. United States District Court S. D. California. Central Division. February 29, 1960. Brady, Nossaman & Walker, Joseph L. Wyatt, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff. Laughlin E. Wat

MEMORANDUM LOWELL A. REED, Jr., District Judge. This is a class action for asbestos-related personal injuries. Currently before me is the joint motion of the settling parties for approval of notice to the class (Document No. 445). I. BACKGROUND1 On January 15, 1993, counsel for the plaintiff class filed the complaint in this a

962 F.Supp. 450 (1997) In re: THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION. No. MDL 1061. Civil Action No. 95-4704. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 17, 1997. *451 *452 *453 *454