Cases

OPINION SUE WALKER, Justice. I. Introduction A jury found Appellant Charles Sto-baugh guilty of the offense of murder for causing the death of Kathy Stobaugh and assessed his punishment at 25 years’ confinement; the trial court sentenced him accordingly. The State contended at trial that the murder occurred on December 29, 2004,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND (2) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT MARILYN L. HUFF, District Judge. On June 20, 2012, Plaintiff Mary Glover filed a motion to remand the case to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 6.) On July 2, 2012, Defendants Borelli’s Pizza, Inc. and North El Camino Real, L.L.C. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs First Am

837 A.2d 21 (2003) SEIDMAN AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. and Lawrence B. Seidman, Plaintiffs, v. G.A. FINANCIAL, INC. and John M. Kish, Defendants. C.A. No. 20367. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: October 2, 2003. Decided: October 7, 2003. *22 Gregory P. Varallo, Richard P. Rollo, Richards, L

PEARSON, Judge. The appellants are James Kish and Leevy Mears. They were informed against in a two-count information for the crime of unlawfully and feloniously breaking and entering a dwelling house located in Dade County, Florida, with intent to commit a felony, to wit: robbery, and while unlawfully therein assaulting persons lawfully therein, and robbery. The information alleged that the crime was perpetrated on September 8

Opinion by Judge HUME. Plaintiff, Jeffrey Robertson, appeals the judgment denying his claims for declaratory judgment and for relief under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) against defendants, Aurora Civil Service Commission (Commission), Ellis B. Burton, John G. Kish, William R. Davis, Stephen E. McDonald, Gerald L. Williams, and the City of Aurora. We affirm. Plaintiff was employed by the Aurora Pol

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS In this appeal, we consider whether a potential beneficiary under a will may collaterally attack the distribution of the decedent's estate by challenging the subject matter jurisdiction of the commissioner of accounts who, without a referral from the circuit court, gave aid and guidance in the interpretation of the decedent's will and the determination of his heirs. Additionally

46 F.Supp.2d 8 (1999) J.B. FLOYD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert E. RUBIN, Secretary of the Treasury, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 98-670(SS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 31, 1999. *9 Robert Edward Deso, Jr., Deso, Thomas, Spevack, Weitzman & Rost, P.C., Washington, DC, for J.B. Floyd, Roy

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Appellant, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., filed a complaint in the Tenth District Court of Appeals for a writ of mandamus that would require appellee the Industrial Commission of Ohio to vacate its award of permanent-total-disability compensation to appellee Robert L. Mason. {¶ 2} The court of appeals denied the writ, concluding that Old Dominion did not have a clear legal right to the re

328 F.Supp.2d 1319 (2004) EXCESS RISK UNDERWRITERS, INC. a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. LAFAYETTE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, Defendant. No. 01-4111-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. May 3, 2004. *1320 *1321 *1322

OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. In 2010, Congress passed the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), a law aimed at reducing tax evasion by United States taxpayers holding funds in foreign accounts. FATCA imposes account-reporting requirements (and hefty penalties for noncompliance) on both individual taxpayers and foreign financial institutions (FFIs). F

DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief United States District Judge Currently before the Court, in this employment discrimination action filed by Celeste Panagopoulos (“Plaintiff’) against the New York State Department of Transportation (“DOT” or “Defendant”), is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. (Dkt. No. 24.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion i

DATE: 11/13/2018 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:29:24 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 04302018 GROUP 1, REINST FEE ASSESSED _______________________________________________________

354 F.Supp.2d 203 (2005) I.B.E.W. LOCAL NO. 241 PENSION PLAN, and its Trustees, Arnold Dates, David Carr, Bill Emmons, Matthew Labosky, Thomas Stebbins, Jr., and Michael Talarski, by and on behalf of themselves, individually, and the I.B.E.W. Local No. 241 Pension Plan, Plaintiffs, v. FIRST ALLMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. and DOES 10, Defendants, First Allmerica Financial Life Insurance Co., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Philip Kis

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: We withdraw our prior opinion, Lyda Swinerton Builders, Inc. v. Oklahoma Surety Co. , 877 F.3d 600 (5th Cir. 2017), and substitute the following in light of the Texas Supreme Court's opinion on rehearing in USAA Texas Lloyds Co. v. Menchaca ,

JAMES E. GRAVES, JR., Circuit Judge: This case involves several issues of Texas law relating to an insurer’s duty to defend and the damages that an insured may recover when an insurer breaches that duty. The district court, after disposing of much of the case through a series of partial summary judgment rulings and conducting a bench trial on one remaining claim, issued a final judgment that largely (

942 F.Supp. 1061 (1996) In re BLUE CROSS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 93-1591. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. September 5, 1996. *1062 Alfred G. Yates, Pittsburgh, PA, Steve W. Berman, Clifford A. Cantor, Hagens & Berman, Seattle, WA, for Mark Tonn, Jon Kish, Frank W. Knisley. Michael

DuBois, District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This is a fraud case in which Kilbride Investments Limited, Busystore Limited, and Bergfeld Co. Limited (collectively, "plaintiffs"), allege that defendants, Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc. ("C & W"), Blank Rome LLP ("Blank Rome"), and Cozen O'Conner, P.C. ("Cozen"),1 induced them into investing at least $27 millio

586 F.Supp.2d 905 (2008) Michael S. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY et al., Defendants. No. 05 C 2572. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 23, 2008. *908 Richard George Douglass, Novack and Macey LLP, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Joshua G. Rodin, Illinois Attorney Ge

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IMMERSION CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HTC CORPORATION, HTC AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2015-1574 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00259-TBD, Judg