Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Richard E. Flanigan, Jr.”
Flanigan v. General Electric Co.public domain
BACKGROUND McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: The demise of the Soviet Union in the early 1990’s had a direct impact upon the *82defense industry in the United States. As the industry reshaped itself, the Martin Marietta Corporation (now Lockheed Martin or “Lockheed”) acquired the General Electric Company’s (“GE’s”) aerospace division in a bewilderingly com
Richard Booth, Jr. v. Karen Pszczolkowskipublic domain
FILED STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA June 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
State v. Flanigan, 21460 (6-22-2007)public domain
OPINION {¶ 1} Dennis Cole Flanigan appeals from his conviction and sentence on two counts of aggravated vehicular homicide while under the influence of alcohol. Following a jury trial, Flanigan was found guilty and sentenced to six years in prison on each count *Page 2 to run consecutively for a total of twelve years. Additionally, the court suspended Flanigan's driver's licens
In Re Succession of Flaniganpublic domain
961 So.2d 541 (2007) SUCCESSION OF James Timothy FLANIGAN. No. 2006-CA-1402. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. June 13, 2007. Michael H. Rasch, Preston L. Hayes, Chehardy Sherman Ellis Murray Recile Griffith Stakelum & Hayes, L.L.P., Metairie, LA, for Appellant, George E. Bain. S. Ault Hootsell III, Harry M. Barton, Phelps Dunbar, L.L.P., New Orleans,
Dodge v. Flaniganpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The appellants Richard J. Dodge and Edison Archer sued the appellees, owners of a trailer park property, and the purchasers were joined on the theory that they had conspired with the sellers to effect the sale in a manner so as to deprive the brokers of their rightful commission. Summary judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, and the plaintiffs appealed. Dodge alleged he was employed to
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: We granted rehearing en banc to review the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance prohibiting the sale of sexual devices in light of several recent Supreme' Court decisions which, it was argued, call into question the continued vitality of this Court’s decision in Williams v. Attorney General (Williams IV), 378 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2004). After we agreed to take the case en banc, the defendant
WILSON, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we review the district court’s dismissal of two complaints that challenge the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance prohibiting the sale, rental, or lease of obscene material. After the benefit of briefing and oral argument, we conclude that the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause claim is foreclosed by our prior holding in
Flanigan v. General Electric Co.public domain
242 F.3d 78 (2nd Cir. 2001) WILLIAM G. FLANIGAN, I/ & on behalf of all others similarly situated; ROGER L. PAPE, I/ & on behalf of all others similarly situated; DAVID J. OSTERHOUT, I/ & on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARVIN F. SEDLACEK, I/ & on behalf of all others similarly situated; ALAN R. SAYDAH, I/ & on behalf of all others similarly situated; JOSEPH E. LEONE, I/ & on behalf of all others similarly situate
Sopko v. Clear Channel Satellite Services, Inc.public domain
151 P.3d 663 (2006) H. Michael SOPKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLEAR CHANNEL SATELLITE SERVICES, INC., Donald Harms, and Monty Dent, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05CA1811. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. VI. November 30, 2006. Mitchem & Flanigan, LLC, James E. Mitchem, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Brownstein Hyatt & Farber, P.C., David D. Po
Sergio Rodriguez v. Raymours Furniture(074603)public domain
Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal we address whether the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49 — a law established to fulfill a public-interest purpose — can be contravened by private agreement. Here an employment application contained a provision requiring the ap
New England Carpenters Pension Fund v. Haffnerpublic domain
WILLIAM W. FRANCIS, JR., Judge. New England Carpenters Pension Fund (“the Pension Fund”), a shareholder of defendant Leggett & Platt, Inc. (“Leg-gett”), appeals the trial court’s dismissal without prejudice of its ten-count petition which alleged, in part, that Leggett’s officers and directors engaged in the backdating of stock options, as well as the subsequent falsification of financial statements based on their failur
Ross Farms, Inc. v. Moorepublic domain
873 S.W.2d 308 (1994) ROSS FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Missouri Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William and Sherma MOORE, Defendants-Appellants. No. 18807. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. March 31, 1994. *309 Hal E. Hunter, Jr., Hunter & Hunter, New Madrid, for plaintiff-respondent. Richard
Claassen v. City & County of Denverpublic domain
Opinion by Judge NIETO. Plaintiffs, Carl L. Claassen, Susan D. Claassen, Linda T. Kaysen, Edward L. Kay-sen, Jr., Thompson P. Stanfield, Carol U. Stanfield, Michael S. Katz, Holly Kim Katz, Joseph R. Ross, Mark Black, Peggy Tabor, Julie L. Roubidoux, Jodie E. Hogan, Bobby L. McGee, Sandra McGee, Kay Banta, Rodney G. Lambertson, and Carolyn L. Lam-bertson, appeal the trial court's judgment dismissing their claim
McGRAW, Justice: This case comes before us on a rule to show cause why the respondents should not be held in contempt of this Court. The respondents are the West Virginia Public Employees Retirement System (hereinafter “PERS”), its Board of Trustees1 and its Executive Secretary, J.D. Hinkle, Jr. Willard M. Ansel, the Executive Secretary of the Teacher’s Retirement Board, is also named as a responde
Arising out of Janiszewski v. Tonn & Blank, Inc.public domain
OPINION MATTINGLY, Judge Non-party witnesses Simos Kefalidis and David C. Adams (the witnesses) appeal the trial court’s finding that they are in contempt for their refusal to answer certain questions during their depositions in a wrongful death action. They present one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court violated the witnesses’ right against self-incrimination1
804 S.W.2d 63 (1991) STATE of Missouri, ex rel. MERCANTILE BANK OF SPRINGFIELD, Relator, v. Honorable William H. PINNELL, Jr., Judge of the 39th Judicial Circuit, Respondent. No. 17110. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. February 26, 1991. Glenn A. Burkart, Bruce E. Hunt, Mann, Walter, Burkart, Weathers & Walter, Springfield, for relator
602 S.E.2d 805 (2004) 216 W.Va. 129 WAMPLER FOODS, INC., Appellant, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION DIVISION, Tammy S. Pancake, and Gregory Burton, Executive Director of Workers' Compensation Commission, Appellees. State of West Virginia, ex rel. Charles Thompson, Petitioner. v. Gregory A. Burton, Executive Director, West Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission, Respondent. State of West Virginia ex rel. Morris
Chapman v. McNeilpublic domain
740 S.W.2d 701 (1987) Edwin E. CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul S. McNEIL, Jr., Director of Revenue, Defendant-Respondent. No. 15169. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. November 25, 1987. *702 W. Swain Perkins, Thayer, for plaintiff-appellant. William L. Webster, Atty. Gen., Richard L. Wieler,
State v. Burrispublic domain
MAUS, Judge. Defendant appeals his conviction of the class B misdemeanor of driving while intoxicated. § 577.010. In this judge tried case defendant was fined $200. The facts are summarized as follows. On September 24, 1985, at approximately 9:00 p.m. Deputy Sheriff Albert Brown was traveling east on Missouri Highway 32. He was behind a car driven by defendant traveling at a speed of about 40 to 45 miles
In re Adoption of S. E. F.public domain
MAUS, Chief Justice. This case involves an adoption by a stepfather. The mother and natural father *266were married in 1974. The child whose adoption is sought was born to them on May 8, 1975. The marriage was dissolved on September 13, 1976. Custody of the child was awarded to the mother. The parties were reconciled in June of 1977. After that date they lived togethe