Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Richard Earl Terrell and Laurie Anne Terrell”
Dismiss and Opinion Filed June 27, 2013. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01140-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND-DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LARRY
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 7, 2013. Court of Appeals S In The Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00893-CV DOUBLE DIAMOND DELAWARE, INC., DOUBLE DIAMOND, INC., WHITE BLUFF CLUB CORP., NATIONAL RESORT MANAGEMENT CO., R. MICHAEL WARD, FRED CURRAN, GEORGE COLLINS, LAR
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
264 F.3d 344 (3rd Cir. 2001) IN RE: ORTHOPEDIC BONE SCREW PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL No. 1014)J.T. Bradley and Kathy W. Bradley, Appellants in No. 00-3899Regina M. Luellen and Eurston Luellen, Sr., Appellants in No. 00-3900Randal Jon Uribe, Appellant in No. 00-3901Mitchell H. Walker and Kim S. Walker, Appellants in No. 00-3902Jose Morfin, Appellant in No. 00-3903Mary K. Mullen Schmelter and Kurt Allen Schmelter, Appel
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
Crum v. Alabamapublic domain
ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pending before the court is defendants’ motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ counsel Robert L. Wiggins, Jr. and his law firm, Gordon, Silberman, Wiggins & Childs (GSWC). Defendants claim that Wiggins *1328violated Rules 4.2, 1.6 through 1.9, and 1.16 of the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct
IN RE: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcementpublic domain
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
Amend. to Regulating Fla. Bar Rule 4-1.5public domain
939 So.2d 1032 (2006) In re AMENDMENT TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR-RULE 4-1.5(F)(4)(B) OF THE RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. No. SC05-1150. Supreme Court of Florida. September 28, 2006. Stephen H. Grimes and Jerome W. Hoffman of Holland and Knight, LLP, Tallahassee, FL, Petitioners. John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Henry M. Coxe, III, President,
In Re Employment Discrimination Litigation Alpublic domain
453 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2001) In re: EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION AGAINST THE STATE OF ALABAMA, et al. Eugene Crum, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Alabama, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.94-T-356-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. July 9, 2001. *1324 *1325<
Coleman v. Statepublic domain
I agree with the majority's unpublished memorandum as to all issues except Issue IV. As to Issue IV, I dissent, based on Judge Shaw's special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, Aug. 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). As to those points of law on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, supra. *Page 167 DECISIONS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPIN
In re Amendment to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar-Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(b) of the Rules of Professional Conductpublic domain
PER CURIAM. We have for consideration proposals for amending the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. In the November 2004 election, voters of the State of Florida approved the following amendment to the Florida Constitution: In any medical liability claim involving a contingency fee, the claimant is entitled to receive no
OPINION OF THE COURT REAVLEY, Circuit Judge. This Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) claim against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for granting clearance to market certain types of pedicle screw fixation devices (referred to generally as bone screws) was dismissed by the District Court pursuant to the discretionary function exception to the FTCA.1 Appellants contend here that
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri