Cases

FILED August 31, 2022 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

OPINION MICHAEL MASSENGALE, Justice. This appeal arises from a claim by appellant Lee Ann Wheelbarger that the ap-pellees, the City of El Lago and Richard Smith (sued in his official capacity only), violated her constitutional right to due process in determining that a condominium complex in which she owned a unit had been “substantially damaged” by Hurrica

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 24, 2004 Session JOANN MALLINAK GLASSELL v. RICHARD LEE GLASSELL Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 150397-3 Sharon Bell, Chancellor FILED JUNE 10, 2004 No. E2003-01602-COA-R3-CV Joann Mallinak Glassell (“Plaintiff”)

886 S.W.2d 848 (1994) Lee RICHARD, Elda Richard, and Fire Insurance Exchange, Appellants, v. Arbery TAYLOR d/b/a Taylor Air Conditioning & Heating and Intercity Products Corporation, U.S.A., Appellees. Nos. 09-93-263 CV, 09-93-281 CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted September 15, 1994. Decided November 3, 1994. Rehearing Over

Lee, District Judge. The appellant, Doug Taylor, claims that the Board of Public Works and Safety of the City of Lawrenceburg ("the Board") terminated his employment with the City because of his disagreements with the Mayor and exposure of purported wrongdoing by City officials. Seeking redress, Taylor filed suit against the City, members of the Board, and several City officials, bringi

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,_________________ August 02, 2012 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A12A2297. RICHARD LEE WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR REGIONAL HOSPITAL. Richard Lee Williams filed a notice of appeal from an order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this civil action. We lack jurisdiction. Because Williams is incarcerated, his a

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012); Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). TAYLOR, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. Beth Rylee’s husband, Richard Ry-lee, was injured in a motorcycle accident. After the Rylees received the full “each person” policy limit for damages resulting from Richard’s bodily injury, the Rylees sued their two insurers. They claimed Beth was entitled to her own each-person policy limit for her “s

ISHEE, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Xezavion Taylor was indicted by a Washington County grand jury for Count I, armed robbery; Count II, armed carjacking; Count III, kidnapping; Count IV, house burglary; Count V, possession of a weapon by a felon; and a sentence enhancement for using a firearm during the commission of the crimes. After a trial, the jury returned a guilty verdict on all counts. Taylor was then sent

TAYLOR, J. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the litigation privilege bars a claim for malicious prosecution. In appellant’s malicious prosecution action below, the trial court granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment and later entered final judgment against appellant. We reverse and hold that the litigation privilege cannot be applied to bar the filing of a

JUSTICE FERNANDEZ-VINA delivered the opinion of the Court. **118In this case the Court is tasked with determining whether an electrical inspector is entitled to qualified immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:3-3, or absolute immunity under N.J.S.A. 59:3-5 or -7, pursuant to the Tort Claims Act (TCA). The case stems from a tragic fire in the City of Pat

322 B.R. 306 (2004) In re Joel TAYLOR, Debtor. Kevin Kleman, Plaintiff, v. Joel Taylor, Defendant. No. 03-3467. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. June 17, 2004. *307 Kevin Kleman, Glandorf, OH, Randy Lee Reeves, Lima, OH, for Plaintiff. Joel R. Taylor, Ottawa, OH, William H White, Lima, OH, for Defendant.

ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge. This matter is before the court on defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs second amended complaint. (DE 30, 32). Plaintiff filed a response and defendants replied. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motions to dismiss will be granted. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Plaintiff fi

LEE & PERLES, L.L.P. * NO. 2021-CA-0071 FORMERLY KNOWN AS LEE, FUTRELL & PERLES, L.L.P., * GARY A. LEE AND RICHARD COURT OF APPEAL M. PERLES * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA RESOLUTE MANAGEMENT, ******* INC., ONEBEACON AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, LAMORAK IN

LEE & PERLES, L.L.P. * NO. 2021-CA-0071 FORMERLY KNOWN AS LEE, FUTRELL & PERLES, L.L.P., * GARY A. LEE AND RICHARD COURT OF APPEAL M. PERLES * FOURTH CIRCUIT VERSUS * STATE OF LOUISIANA RESOLUTE MANAGEMENT, ******* INC., ONEBEACON AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY, LAMORAK IN

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal the district court’s orders granting the Arnold Defendants’ motion to dismiss, granting the E&D Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, granting default judgment against other defendants and awarding damages, and entering final judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no error. As to their arg

OPINION MEYERS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, KEASLER, and HERVEY, JJ., joined. Appellant, Richard Lee Rabb, was convicted of tampering with physical evidence under Section 37.09(a)(1) of the Texas Penal Code and sentenced to six years of confinement. The Seventh Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s ju

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-2085 Filed June 18, 2025 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. RICHARD LEE SHOGREN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Marshall County, John Haney, Judge. A criminal defendant appeals his convictions for domestic abuse assault and harassment. AFFI

FORST, J. Appellant Freddie McLawhorn was convicted of several crimes, including felony murder and burglary, stemming from a break-in that resulted in the death of a young woman. Appellant appeals both the admission of certain testimony at trial and his sentence. Although we hold the trial court properly admitted the testimony, we agree that Appellant’s sentence is improper and

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED RICHARD KEVIN JACKSON, January 12, 2024 Petitioner Below, Petitioner C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS