Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Richard M. Osborne”
Gas Natural Inc. v. Osbornepublic domain
HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge. Gas Natural Inc. brought this action to enjoin its former chief executive officer (CEO), chairperson, and board member Richard M. Osborne from soliciting its shareholders without complying with Section 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(Act), 15 U.S.C. § 78n, and related Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations. See 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.14a-l to -21 (Regulation 14a). Th
Osborne v. Leroy Twp.public domain
THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J. {¶ 1} Appellants, Richard M. Osborne, Trustee, and Great Plains Exploration, L.L.C., appeal the trial court's summary judgment ruling against them. They contend that the trial court misinterpreted the Leroy Township zoning resolution preventing them from maintaining an outdoor sign. For the following reasons, we affirm. {¶ 2} This appeal is the
Richard Osborne v. Arlyn Grussingpublic domain
LOKEN, Chief Judge. Richard Osborne and Jerome Sammon own residential property on Circle Lake in Rice County, Minnesota. They commenced this § 1983 suit against Rice County and four County officials, alleging that defendants were selectively enforcing provisions of the Rice County Zoning Ordinance in retaliation for plaintiffs’ public criticism of the County’s lax enforcement of
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Richard Norman Swaney, Jr. v. Lisa M. Bucklewpublic domain
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED February 8, 2024 RICHARD NORMAN SWANEY, JR., C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK Plaintiff Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF W
Apennine Acquisition Co., LLC v. Richard M. Quillpublic domain
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SELENA E. MOLINA LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER MASTER IN CHANCERY 500 NORTH KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DE 19801-3734
People v. Osbornepublic domain
973 P.2d 666 (1998) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael R. OSBORNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96CA0776. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. April 30, 1998. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1998. Certiorari Denied March 22, 1999.[*] *668 Gale A. Norton, Attorney G
Johanson, A.C.J. ¶1 Robert and Anne Roberts (the Robertses) sued real estate broker James Donnerstag and his employer, CB Richard Ellis Inc.,1 under The Securities Act of Washington (Act).2 The Robertses alleged (1) that Donnerstag made material misrepresentations and omissions in selling the Robertses a DBSI3 property interest; (2) that he sol
Harrison Jolly v. R. Badgett Tony Gammon Jim Moore M.K. Rodriguez Roy Osborne Richard D. Davis Huel Jenkinspublic domain
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge, concurring and dissenting. I would reverse the district court’s judgment as to corrections officers Richard Davis, Roy Osborne, and Huel Jenkins, who interfered with Jolly’s prescribed treatment on two occasions. It is uncontroverted that Jolly had a serious medical need, as he was diagnosed with epilepsy and hypertens
Osborne v. Adoption Center of Choicepublic domain
70 P.3d 58 (2003) 2003 UT 15 Frank OSBORNE, Petitioner, v. ADOPTION CENTER OF CHOICE, a Utah corporation, J.S. and S.S., Adoptive Parents, Respondents. No. 20020515. Supreme Court of Utah. May 2, 2003. *59 Phillip E. Lowry, Salt Lake City, for petitioner. Larry S. Jenkins, Richard J. Armstrong, Salt
Villazon v. Osbornepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA24-912 Filed 1 October 2025 Ashe County, No. 22CVS000061-040 BIBIANA VILLAZON, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL ALAN OSBORNE and SAMANTHA HAMBY, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL SKINNER, Third-Party Defendant. Appeal by defendants from order entered 13 December 2022 by Judge Richard S. Go
Richard B. Osborn Appellant v. R. James Nicholsonpublic domain
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 05-2898 RICHARD B. OSBORN APPELLANT , V. R. JAMES NICHOLSON , SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
People of Michigan v. Richard Damien Osbornepublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 5, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 146776
Osborne v. Bank of America, National Ass'npublic domain
234 F.Supp.2d 804 (2002) Aaron L. OSBORNE and Bonita R. Osborne, husband and wife, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendant. No. 3:02-0364. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. September 23, 2002. *805
People of Michigan v. Richard Damien Osbornepublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan September 19, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 144737
Justice Souter, dissenting. I respectfully dissent on the ground that Alaska has failed to provide the effective procedure required by the Fourteenth Amendment for vindicating the liberty interest in demonstrating innocence that the state law recognizes. I therefore join Part I of Justice Stevens’s dissenting opinion. I would not decide Osborne’s
[Cite as Mentor Heisley Racquet & Fitness Club, L.P. v. Osborne, 2025-Ohio-4420.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY MENTOR HEISLEY RACQUET CASE NO. 2025-L-029 & FITNESS CLUB, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, Civil Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas - vs - CYN
Osborne v. Statepublic domain
Senior Judge COATS, dissenting. This case begins with the police obtaining a warrant to search the Northwood Drive residence for William Young. The police had reliable information that Young was a high-end methamphetamine dealer who dealt in large quantities of the drug and that he was present at the Northwood Drive residence.1 The police served the warrant just after midnight on Februa
Lau, J. ¶1 Richard and Marnie Fox appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion for a writ of mandamus *260 seeking to compel Skagit County to issue a building permit. The Foxes argue the trial court erred when it ruled that the well on their property, despite being exempt from the water permit re
United States v. Osbornepublic domain
STRICKLAND, Judge: In accordance with his pleas, appellant was convicted of an unauthorized absence of nearly a year, terminated by apprehension; two specifications of carnal knowledge of two different thirteen year old girls; sodomy with one of the aforementioned girls; assault consummated by a battery upon a child; communication of a threat; and altering a military identification card, in violation of Articles 86, 120, 125