Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Richard Schomer and Shannon Schomer”
RSI (India) Pvt., Ltd. v. United Statespublic domain
678 F.Supp. 304 (1988) RSI (INDIA) PVT., LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Pinkerton Foundry, Inc., et al., Defendants-Intervenors. Court No. 87-01-00086. United States Court of International Trade. January 28, 1988. *305 Brownstein, Zeidman & Schomer, Irwin P. Altschuler and Ronald M. Wisla,
666 F.Supp. 1562 (1987) MANUFACTURAS INDUSTRIALES DE NOGALES, S.A., Karen Internacional, S.A. de C.V. and Elegance De Baja California, S.A., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Court No. 85-03-00373. United States Court of International Trade. July 24, 1987. *1563 Brownstein Zeidman and Schomer, Irwin P. Altschuler, David R.
Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
MAYER, Circuit Judge. The government appeals the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 758 F.Supp. 729 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1991), finding subject matter jurisdiction and compelling the United States Customs Service to withdraw a ruling letter approving certain practices of marking imported frozen produce. We reverse and remand with instructions to dismiss. Background
Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
963 F.2d 356 14 ITRD 1001 NORCAL/CROSETTI FOODS, INC., Patterson Frozen Foods, Inc.,and Richard A. Shaw, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.The UNITED STATES, U.S. Customs Service, U.S. Department ofTreasury, Nicholas Brady, John Durant and HowardB. Fox, Defendants-Appellants. No. 91-1295. United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit.