Cases

PER CURIAM. Carl Cook filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against thirty-four individuals, most of whom were members of an Arkansas State Police (ASP) SWAT team or the Fifth Judicial Drug Task Force (DTF), and he claimed, in relevant part, that they used excessive and unreasonable force in *28the execution of a no-knock search warrant at his home on July 13, 1999, needles

PER CURIAM. Carl Cook filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against thirty-four individuals, most of whom were members of an Arkansas State Police (ASP) SWAT team or the Fifth Judicial Drug Task Force (DTF), and he claimed, in relevant part, that they used excessive and unreasonable force in *28the execution of a no-knock search warrant at his home on July 13, 1999, needles

PER CURIAM. Carl Franklin Cook appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for damages. Cook filed the complaint in January 2004, alleging that on July 13, 1999, defendants used excessive force in the execution of a search warrant, damaging his real and personal property. The district court dismissed the complaint as untimely because it was filed outside the three-year limitations peri

PUDLOWSKI, Judge. This is an appeal from a judgment in which the trial court sustained defendants’ motions to dismiss and motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal. The facts are not in dispute. On September 23,1965, plaintiffs, Samuel and Barbara Scott entered into a contract to purchase 1.23 acre parcel of real estate located in the City of Kirkwood from defendants Harold and Ann Gibbons. Defendant J

Opinion by Judge J. JONES. Plaintiffs, Gregory T. Ludlow, S. Reid Ludlow, and Jean E. Cowles (together, the sellers), appeal the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants, Lynda S. Gibbons, Brent Wilson, and Gibbons-White, Inc. (together, the brokers). The sellers also appeal the court's award of attorney fees and costs to the brokers. In the event that we reverse any part of the court'

Supreme Court No. 2020-288-C.A. (N2/18-125A) State : v. : Richard Gamache. : NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Rhode Island Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Opinion Analyst, Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 250 Benefit Street, Providence,

01/31/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 29, 2025 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FORREST SCOTT EVANS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County No. S63883 James F. Goodwin, Jr., Judge ___________________________________

BRIAN JACK GOREE, Presiding Judge. {1 Plaintiff/Appellant, Cassie Graves (Client), seeks review of the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Appellee, N. Scott Johnson (Lawyer) in Client's action for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We affirm because Client's allegations do not state an actionable claim for bad faith and there is no ev

OPINION OF THE COURT GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Allen Bodine Scott appeals, and certain defendants cross-appeal, from a final judgment which disposed of all Scott’s claims after trial of his numerous complaints charging violations of his civil rights. Several of those claims were submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict in his favor on two of them and in favor of the defendants on one. On a post-trial mot

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0131p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RUBY HICKS, Administrator of the Estate of ┐ Quandavier K. Hicks, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

18-163-cr United States v. Scott In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2020 No. 18-163-cr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. GERALD SCOTT,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0190p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ VICTOR DEWAYNE TAYLOR, │

OPINION OF THE COURT GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals bring before us five separate pro se complaints filed by Allen B. Scott, a long time resident of Trenton State Hospital, a psychiatric hospital to which New Jersey has customarily committed persons charged with a crime but unable to stand trial or acquitted by reason of insanity. In District Court Civil

OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT, — U.S. —, 102 S.Ct. 3474, 73 L.Ed.2d 1362 GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. It involves a suit by Allen Bodine Scott, an inmate of the Vroom Building at Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital, for declaratory, injunctive, and habeas corpus relief, and for money damages for violation of his rights under federal and state l

172 F.3d 959 34 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 157, Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,915 In the Matter of Richard E. SCOTT, Debtor.Ronald R. Peterson, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Richard E. Scott, Defendant-Appellee.In the Matter of Douglas W. Scott, Debtor.Ronald R. Peterson, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Douglas W. Scott, Defendant-Appellee.In the Matter of Douglas H. Scott, Debtor.Ronald R. Peterson, Plaintiff-Appellant,

561 F.3d 453 (2009) Anthony BRAXTON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Richard GANSHEIMER, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. No. 07-3387. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: September 8, 2008. Decided and Filed: April 2, 2009. *454 ARGUED: Michael Scott Criss, Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Columbus, O

OPINION MOORE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Donteony Scott (“Scott”) appeals his conviction following a *318jury trial for one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). On appeal, Scott argues that the district court improperly admitted Officer Stephen Scelfo’s (“Scelfo”) hearsay statement over Scot

OPINION By the Court, Cherry, J.: In this appeal, we address the factors that the district court must consider when determining whether to grant or deny a motion for a preferential trial date to avoid the expiration of NRCP 41(e)’s five-year period. We conclude that, in accordance with our decision in Monroe, Ltd. v. Central Telephone Co., 91 Nev. 450, 456, 538 P.2d 152, 156

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 7, 2011 KEVEN SCOTT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 06-01965 Paula Skahan, Judge No. W2010-02515-CCA-R3-PC - Filed November 22, 2011 The Petitioner was convicted by a jury for possession of cocaine, possession of more than

700 F.Supp.2d 510 (2010) LV, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 9917(RJH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 31, 2010. *511 Elisa F. Hyman, Friedman & Moses LLP, Jeffrey Lance Nagel, Gibbons P.C., Joseph S. Genova, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley Etc., Randee