Cases

OPINION FISHER, Circuit Judge: Florencio Pacleb filed a class action complaint, against Allstate Insurance Company, alleging he received unsolicited automated telephone calls to his cellular telephone, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, Taking a cue from a recent Supreme Court case, Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomez, — U

LARRY G. SMITH, Judge. Appellant appeals from an adjudication of guilty, pursuant to a jury verdict, and the imposition of a five year sentence for the offense of possession of more than 20 grams of marijuana. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and argues that the sentence was imposed in violation of North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969). We find no error i

25-1019; 25-1113 Öztürk v. Hyde; Mahdawi v. Trump UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 19th day of September, two thousand twenty-five. Present: DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Chief Judge, RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge. Hyde’s petition for writ of prohibition urges that more than 180 days have elapsed since his arrest and that the trial court no longer has power to try him on an information charging possession of more than 20 grams of marijuana, a third degree felony. We disagree. Hyde previously was charged with the same offense by an earlier information, on which trial was prevented by Hyde’s nolo contend

65 Cal.Rptr.3d 162 (2007) 154 Cal.App.4th 1200 In re Paul HYDE, on Habeas Corpus. No. B196520. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two. August 7, 2007. *163 Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Assistant Attorney General,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [DOC. # 70] JOHN A HOUSTON, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Currently pending before this Court is the motion for class certification filed by plaintiff Richard Springer1 (“plaintiff’). The motion *305has be

405 So.2d 445 (1981) Todd Edwin HYDE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. AC-26. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 14, 1981. Rehearing Denied November 20, 1981. Richard M. Powers, Flynn & Powers, Tallahassee, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and David P. Gauldin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for

ORDER JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. National Accident Insurance Underwriters Incorporated (“NAIU”) began this case in May 2002 against Citibank F.S.B. (“Citibank”). On February 26, 2003, American National Insurance Company (“ANICO”) moved to intervene in the case. See doc. no. 40. The court denied the motion on July 21, 2003, but granted the motion after reconsideration on Octobe

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON. HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge: In 1974, Congress passed the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act (“PRMPA” or “the Act”), which severely restricted former President Nixon’s rights to his p

OSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE STRIKING OF NAMES OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF THE STRIKING OF NAMES OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2018 OK 47Case Number: SCBD-6510Decided: 06/11/2018THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2018 OK 47, __ P.3d __ <

224 F.Supp.2d 1042 (2002) UNITED STATES ex rel., Karen T. WILSON, Plaintiffs, v. GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT; Graham County; Cherokee County Soil & Water Conservation District; Richard Greene; William Timpson; Keith Orr; Raymond Williams; Dale Wiggins; Gerald Phillips; Allen Dehart; Lloyd Millsaps; Jerry Williams; Billy Brown; Lynn Cody; Bill Tipton; C.B. Newton; and Eddie Wood, Defendants. No. C

PER CURIAM: Defendants-Appellants Second Avenue Diner Corp., a New York Corporation d/b/a Plaza Diner, J.J.N.K., a New York Corporation, a public restaurant (“Diner”) and associated landlord located at 1066 Second Avenue, New York, NY, appeal from a September 10, 2012 decision of the United States Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard J. Sullivan, Judge) granting injunctive relief as to several of Todd Kreisler’

579 S.W.2d 422 (1978) FOSTER & CREIGHTON COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILSON CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC., Tyler-Hyde Company, Defendants-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO., Third-Party Defendants-Appellees. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section. October 27, 1978. Certiorari Denied March 19, 1979.

OSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION OSCN navigation Home Courts

504 F.3d 828 (2007) April REDDING, legal guardian of minor child, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFFORD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT # 1; Kerry Wilson, husband; Jane Doe Wilson, wife; Helen Romero, wife; John Doe Romero, husband; Peggy Schwallier, wife; John Doe Schwallier, husband, Defendants-Appellees. No. 05-15759. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Mar

422 B.R. 478 (2010) In re THE LOVESAC CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. The Liquidating Trust of the Lovesac Corporation, et al., Plaintiff, v. Craig Cox, Powder Mountain Group Holdings, LLC, and Nielson Livestock, LLC, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 06-10080 (CSS). Adversary No. 08-50250 (CSS). United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware. January 15, 2010.

Justice BEATTY. I concur in result. In my view, the circuit court correctly dismissed Appellant’s declaratory judgment action. I disagree, however, with the majority’s reasoning as I believe the circuit court had subject matter jurisdiction, but the matter was not procedurally proper for its consideration. Because Appellant’s primary purpose for filing the action was to seek a declaration that Respondent’s conduct violated

Timothy S. Black, United States District Judge This civil action is before the Court regarding Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 34) and responsive memoranda (Docs. 40, 44). I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A. Factual Background Plaintiff Beth Harrison has been an employee of Defendant The Procter & Gamble Company Distributing, L

MEMORANDUM OPINION INGE PRYTZ JOHNSON, District Judge. This action seeks habeas corpus relief with respect to Petitioner Geoffrey Todd West’s (“West” or “Petitioner”) state court conviction and death sentence on a charge of capital murder. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006). All of the claims have been briefed to the Court, and the petition is ready for adjudication.

KEITH, Circuit Judge. Defendants Paul Lash (“Lash”), Richard Tommasi (“Tommasi”), and Lawrence Dres-*1080ner (“Dresner”) appeal from their April 6, 1990, judgments of conviction and sentences for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendant Carol Ross (“Ross”) appeals from her April 26, 1990, judgment of conviction and sentenc