Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Richard v. Moore”
Richard Moore v. Brian Stirlingpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-4 RICHARD BERNARD MOORE, Petitioner – Appellant, v. BRYAN P. STIRLING, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections; WILLIE DAVIS, Warden of Kirkland Reception and Evaluation Center, Respondents – Appellees. Appeal from
Richard Bernard Moore v. Bryan P. Stirlingpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Richard Bernard Moore, Petitioner, v. Bryan P. Stirling, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2020-001519 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS Opinion No. 28088 Heard May 5, 2021 – Filed April 6, 2022 RELIEF DENIED Lindsey Sterling Vann and Hannah L. Freeman, both of Justice 360, of Columbia; Gerald Malloy, of Malloy La
RICHARD MOORE v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RICHARD BRYSON MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D19-90 [May 9, 2019] Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial
MOORE, RICHARD H., PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 537 KA 14-01970 PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD H. MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. KATHLEEN A. KUGLER, CONFLICT DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (EDWARD P. PERLMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. RICHARD H. MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELL
RICHARD BRYSON MOORE v. STATE OF FLORIDApublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT RICHARD BRYSON MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D19-3499 [February 6, 2020] Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circ
Richard Don Moore v. Statepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12-00275-CR RICHARD DON MOORE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-1190-C2
Richard Don Moore v. Statepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-12-00275-CR RICHARD DON MOORE, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2007-1190-C2
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D23-1345 Lower Tribunal No. 2018-CA-001456-O _____________________________ WESTGATE RESORTS, LTD., Appellant,
MOORE, MARK v. HOFFMAN, RICHARD E.public domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 138 CA 13-01104 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. MARK MOORE AND STACY MOORE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF SYDNEY MOORE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD E. HOFFMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. LAW OFFICES OF KAREN L. LAWRENCE, PITTSFORD (BARNEY BILELLO OF COUNSEL), FOR
Richard C. Moore v. Allstate Insurancepublic domain
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Richard C. Moore, individually and in his capacity as FILED Executor of the Estate of Ruth Ann Moore, June 24, 2013 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK Plaintiff Below, Petitioner SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
MOORE, RICHARD M., PEOPLE vpublic domain
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 216 KA 09-01458 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD M. MOORE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SCHLATHER, STUMBAR, PARKS & SALK, LLP, ITHACA (DAVID M. PARKS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from a judgment of the Allega
Moore v. Moorepublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
MOORE, ROBERT D. v. JOHNSON, RICHARD S.public domain
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (James H. Dillon, J.), entered March 13, 2012. The order denied the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for an award of damages on their counterclaim. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of the motion for summary judgment d
Rel: August 30, 2024 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE SUPREME COURT SPECIAL TERM, 2024 SC-2023-0838 Roy S. Moore v. Richard Hagedorn (Appeal from Etowah Circuit Court: CV-18-900346). PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Sellers, Acting C.J.,* and Mendheim, Stewart, and Mitchell, JJ., and McCool, Minor, and Hanson, Special Justices,* concur. Parker
Rel: August 30, 2024 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE SUPREME COURT SPECIAL TERM, 2024 SC-2023-0836 Richard Hagedorn v. Herring Networks, Inc., Janet Porter, Roy Moore, and Judge Roy Moore for U.S. Senate (Appeal from Etowah Circuit Court: CV-18-900346). PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. NO OPINION. See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P. Sellers, Acting C.J.,* and Mendheim, Stewart, and Mitchell, JJ
Janet M. Hicks v. Richard D. Moorepublic domain
EDMONDSON, Chief Judge: This civil action for damages is, among other things, about a county jail’s practice of strip searching all detainees who were to be placed in the general jail population — regardless of whether reasonable suspicion existed for the search of a particular pretrial detainee. Because we are overcome by this Circuit’s precedent, we must agree with the distr
Christina Owens v. John Hawkins, Janel Sue Skrabanek, Jack Paul Moore, William Richard Moore, and Bruce A. Skrabanekpublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11-00297-CV CHRISTINA OWENS, Appellant v. JOHN HAWKINS, JANEL SUE SKRABANEK, JACK PAUL MOORE, WILLIAM RICHARD MOORE, AND BRUCE A. SKRABANEK, Appellees
Moore v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed.
Moore, Richard A. v. Muncie Police Firepublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 01-3175 RICHARD A. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MUNCIE POLICE AND FIRE MERIT COMMISSION, MIKE SZAKALY, DAVID EILER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________ Appeal from the United States District
Richard Lee Hunter v. Michael W. Moorepublic domain
304 F.3d 1066 Richard Lee HUNTER, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Michael W. MOORE, Robert A. Butterworth, Respondents-Appellants. No. 00-14576. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. September 4, 2002. Edward C. Hill, Jr., Tallahassee, FL, for Respondents-Appellants. Jeraldine William