⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “River Bend Management Group of Florida, LLC”

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 23-12160 Document: 82-1 Date Filed: 05/13/2025 Page: 1 of 127 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12160 ____________________ HM FLORIDA-ORL, LLC,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 23-12160 Document: 82-1 Date Filed: 05/13/2025 Page: 1 of 127 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12160 ____________________ HM FLORIDA-ORL, LLC,
District Court, N.D. Florida · 2016-05-22 · Published · cited 0× · 188 F. Supp. 3d 1246; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74565; 2016 WL 3014606
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Mark E. Walker, United States District Judge This is a declaratory judgment action concerning an insurance policy taken out by a condominium developer. Campus Edge Condominium Association sued Arlington Properties, Inc., the developer of a condominium, in state court, alleging that it had misrepresented the condition of the property and that hundreds of thous
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015-08-31 · Published · cited 1× · 129 F. Supp. 3d 1316; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118719; 2015 WL 5145548
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JAMES LAWRENCE KING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction (DE-27).‘The Court held a preliminary injunction hearing, which lasted five days and was spread out over three months. The Court renders this opinion with the benefit of having heard live testimony, documentary eviden
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006-06-23 · Published · cited 13× · 436 F. Supp. 2d 959; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45523; 2006 WL 1770390
436 F.Supp.2d 959 (2006) Linda ALDRIDGE, Plaintiff, v. FOREST RIVER, INC., Specific Cruise Systems, Inc. Defendants. No. 06 C 352. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 23, 2006. Edmund J. Scanlan, Scanlan Law Group, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. *960 Richard G. Howser, Mary Frances Blazek Kruge
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023-08-02 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 2, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-348 Lower Tribunal No. 18-13147 CC ________________ Peaceful Paws Memorial Services LLC, Appellant,
District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2011-10-03 · Published · cited 0× · 823 F. Supp. 2d 420; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114501; 2011 WL 4703053
MEMORANDUM ORDER KATHLEEN KAY, United States Magistrate Judge: Pending before this court is the plaintiffs motion to remand this suit to the 30th Judicial District Court, Parish of Vernon, State of Louisiana. Doc. 8. For the following reasons, the Motion to Remand is DENIED. *423 Facts and Procedural History
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-09-10 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED NO. 15-25-00134-CV 15-25-00134-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS In the 9/10/2025 12:20 PM
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-93 No. 62PA21/63PA21 Filed 19 August 2022 ANDERSON CREEK PARTNERS, L.P.; ANDERSON CREEK INN, LLC; ANDERSON CREEK DEVELOPERS, LLC; FAIRWAY POINT, LLC; STONE CROSS, LLC d/b/a/ STONE CROSS ESTATES, LLC; RALPH HUFF HOLDINGS, LLC; WOODSHIRE PARTNERS, LLC; CRESTVIEW DEVELOPMENT, LLC; OAKMONT DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC; WELLCO CONTRACTORS, INC
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2022-08-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 2022-NCSC-93 No. 62PA21/63PA21 Filed 19 August 2022 ANDERSON CREEK PARTNERS, L.P.; ANDERSON CREEK INN, LLC; ANDERSON CREEK DEVELOPERS, LLC; FAIRWAY POINT, LLC; STONE CROSS, LLC d/b/a/ STONE CROSS ESTATES, LLC; RALPH HUFF HOLDINGS, LLC; WOODSHIRE PARTNERS, LLC; CRESTVIEW DEVELOPMENT, LLC; OAKMONT DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC; WELLCO CONTRACTORS, INC
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012-05-11 · Published · cited 42× · 871 F. Supp. 2d 433; 2012 WL 1658482
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT TERRENCE F. McVERRY, District Judge. Pending before the Court are DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(1) AND 12(b)(6), AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO STRIKE UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(f) (Document No. 145) and DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION BY THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Document No. 16
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2018-12-04 · Published · cited 2× · 364 F. Supp. 3d 596
JAMES C. DEVER III, United States District Judge On April 2, 2018, Josephine Cole Williams ("Williams" or "plaintiff"), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts ("NCAOC") and Sara Beth Fulford Rhodes ("Rhodes", collectively "defendants"), the Pitt County Clerk of Superior Court, seeking relief under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"),
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2014-10-08 · Published · cited 21× · 70 F. Supp. 3d 816; 2014 WL 5088657
SECOND AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARCIA A. CRONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the court are Defendant Firestone Polymers, LLC’s (“Firestone”) Motions for Summary Judgment (# s 59-66). Having considered the motions, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, the court finds that Firestone’s motions should be granted in part and denied in part.
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 247 F. Supp. 3d 958; 2017 WL 1165287; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46119
OPINION AND ORDER RUDY LOZANO, Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Westfield Insurance Company (‘Westfield”), on March 31, 2016 (DE # 64). For the reasons set forth below, Westfield’s Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 64) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter a DECLARATORY JUDGMENT in favor of Westfield and against all defendants dec
District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2008-05-05 · Published · cited 1× · 560 F. Supp. 2d 1181; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37147; 2008 WL 1994934
(2008) Robert C. BAUCOM, Plaintiff, v. SISCO STEVEDORING, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action 06-0785-WS-B. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. May 5, 2008. ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge. This matter came before the Court for non-jury trial on February 12 and 13, 2008. Both sides called witnesses and int
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-05-26 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-14-00104-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/26/2015 8:21:49 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District · 2025-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 15-25-00011-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/9/2025 1:42 PM 15-25-00011-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020-04-21 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO LAND CLEARANCE FOR ) REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE ) No. ED107081 CITY OF ST. LOUIS, ) ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003-03-19 · Published · cited 14× · 840 So. 2d 389; 2003 WL 1239986
840 So.2d 389 (2003) CITY OF COCONUT CREEK, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation, and Deerfield Beach Energy Center, LLC, Appellees. No. 4D02-1413. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 19, 2003. *390 Nancy E. Stroud and Mark A. Rothenberg of
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-03-19 · Published · cited 7× · 306 F.R.D. 312; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37256; 2015 WL 1321479
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion and Supporting Brief to Determine That This Matter Proceed as a Class Action, filed January 6, 2014 (Doe. 194)(“Motion”). The Court held a two-part class certification hearing with its first portion on March 10,11, and 12, 2014, and its second portion on April 3 and 4, 2014.