Cases

Roman, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part). I disagree with my colleagues in the majority that the Supreme Court erred in awarding summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for employment discrimination in violation of Executive Law § 296. Therefore, I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part, and vote to affirm the order appealed from

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Deshanndon Markelle Franks, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-002244 Appeal From Laurens County Frank R. Addy, Jr., Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5758 Heard October 22, 2019 – Filed August 12, 2020

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-1463 ____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTOINETTE ADAIR, Appellant ____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of P

787 F.Supp.2d 1174 (2011) Deborah WESTWOOD; Mitchell Myers; and Petal Pushers & More, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, doing business as Nookie's Bistro & Spirits, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HERMISTON, Daniel Coloumbe, and Chris Washburn, Defendants. No. 09-CV-478-BR. United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division. April 15, 2011.

PER CURIAM. The plaintiffs, Gordon Geiger and Elizabeth Geiger, brought this action against the defendant, Francis Carey, their next door neighbor, seeking money damages, punitive damages, and an order requiring the defendant to remove a fence. The complaint sounded in three counts: (1) trespass; (2) violation of Connecticut's tree cutting statute, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-560

173 Cal.App.4th 1543 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ CENTER FOR SELF-IMPROVEMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LENNAR CORPORATION et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. A121982. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four. May 20, 2009. *1548 Lozeau Drury, Michael R.

#27348, #27362-a-SLZ 2016 S.D. 35 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** RICHARD KARST and SUSAN KARST, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SHUR-COMPANY n/k/a SHORMA COMPANY and WILSON TRAILER COMPANY, Defendants and Appellees. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

Justice KAVANAUGH, concurring. I agree with the per curiam opinion's resolution of the procedural issues before us-namely, that petitioners' claim for injunctive relief against New York City's old rule is moot and that petitioners' new claims should be addressed as appropriate in the first instance by the Court of Appeals and the District Court on remand. I also agree with Justice ALITO's general analy

611 F.Supp.2d 149 (2009) WESTERN HOLDING GROUP, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE MAYAGÜEZ PORT COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 08-2335 (ADC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 5, 2009. *151 Jorge F. Blasini-Gonzalez, Jose Ramon Rivera-Morales, Jimenez, Graffam & Lausell, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs.

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A disabled employee brings suit against his employer alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. , the Maine Whistleblower Protection Act, 26 M.R.S. §§ 831 et seq. , and the Maine Human Righ

693 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2010) Susan REESE, Plaintiff, v. BARTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, Defendant. No. CIV. S-08-1703 FCD GGH. United States District Court, E.D. California. March 3, 2010. *1175 Catherine M. Corfee, Corfee Stone and Associates, Carmichael, CA, for Plaintiff. Kathleen Mary Abdallah, Thomas O. Perry, Matthew S. Reyn

Ezrasons, Inc. v Rudd (2025 NY Slip Op 03008) Ezrasons, Inc. v Rudd 2025 NY Slip Op 03008 Decided on May 20, 2025 Court of Appeals Cannataro, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

JUDITH E. LEVY, United States District Judge *822This is a class action lawsuit that is part of the litigation collectively referred to as the Flint Water Cases. To those following these cases, the facts are by now well known. Plaintiffs, residents and property owners in Flint, Michigan, were exposed to lead, legionella, and other contaminants within the municipal wate

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Joseph F. Bianco, District Judge: On July 9, 2015, following a nine-week trial, a jury convicted -defendant Phillip Kenner (“Kenner”) of one count of conspiring to commit,wire-fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (Count One of the superseding indictment); four counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2 (Counts Two, Three, Four,

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to enjoin the use of arbitrary government action that benefits private commercial interests and developers within Reinvestment Zone Number Seventeen City of Houston, Texas (“TIRZ117”) at the expense of substantial

ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

965 A.2d 763 (2009) AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC., Consolidated Derivative Litigation. American International Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Maurice R. Greenberg and Howard I. Smith, Defendants. C.A. No. 769-VCS. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Submitted: November 12, 2008. Decided: February 10, 2009. *771 St

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 05-14-00544-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:04:41 AM

ACCEPTED 04-14-00829-cv 04-14-00829-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXA