Cases

OPINION AND ORDER BESOSA, District Judge. Before the Court are two motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Centro Medico del Turabo, Inc., HIMA San Pablo-Bayamon, and HIMA San Pablo Captive Insurance LTD. (collectively, “HIMA”). (Docket Nos. 54 and 55.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS defendants’ motions. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, who are sur

389 F.Supp.2d 224 (2005) Mayra MILLAN, et als., Plaintiffs v. HOSP. SAN PABLO, et als., Defendants No. Civ. 02-2687(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 8, 2005. *225 *226 Jose R. Ortiz-Velez, Ortiz Velez Law Office, Pedro F. Soler-Muniz, Pedro F. Soler Muniz Law Offic

Opinion KLINE, P. J. Under the Board of Equalization’s (SBE) interpretation of the Revenue and Taxation Code, all retail sales of tangible personal property stored, used, or consumed in California are subject, with limited exceptions, to either a state sales or use tax. SBE applies a state sales tax when a Cali

OPINION BERZON, Circuit Judge: Mitchell v. Valenzuela, filed today, holds that a motion to stay and abey a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition to exhaust claims in state court is generally (but not always) dispositive of the unexhausted claims, and that a magistrate judge therefore generally cannot hear and determine such a motion.

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge. Josefina Rubert-Torres appeals from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of one defendant and from the judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the other defendant. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and we have jurisdiction over Rubert-Tor-res’ timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part,

104 Cal.Rptr.2d 772 (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 684 KATHLEEN R. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LIVERMORE, Defendant and Respondent. No. A086349. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Four. March 6, 2001. *774 Michael Millen for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Thomas R. Curry, City Attorney,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23-1091 YEMAL CALDERÓN-AMÉZQUITA, in his personal capacity and as the sole heir of his late Father Carmelo Calderón-Marrero, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. DR. VICTOR RIVERA-CRUZ; DOCTORS' CENTER HOSPITAL BAYAMON, INC.; DR. ANDRÉS ÁVILA-GONZÁLEZ; DR. ANGEL TORRES-SÁNCHEZ; GRUPO DE EMERGENCIAS VRC CSP; DR. CARLOS HERNÁNDEZ-ROMAN; SIMED; PUERTO

88 Cal.Rptr.2d 552 (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1008 CITY OF SAN JOSE, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Santa Clara County, Respondent; San Jose Mercury News, Inc., Real Party in Interest. No. H019262. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. September 8, 1999. Review Denied December 1, 1999.[*]

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Luis Aik Ayala-Sepulveda (“Ayala”) appeals the district court’s award of summary judgment to his employer, the Municipality of San Germán, Puerto Rico (“San Germán” or “the City”), and to the mayor of San Germán, Isidro Negron-Irizarry (“Negron”), on his claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for sex discrimination and retaliation in violation o

La Jueza Asociada Señora Pabón Charneco emitió la opinión del Tribunal. El quid que nos plantea este recurso es si son los árbi-tros o los jueces los llamados a adjudicar una controversia en la que se impugna la existencia y la validez de un con-trato, in toto, cuando el contrato tiene una “cláusula de arbitraje” que es amplia. A su vez, tenemos la oportunidad de determinar, si debemos adoptar en nuestra jur

75 Cal.Rptr.2d 534 (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 785 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF CARLSBAD et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. D027407. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. June 9, 1998. Review Denied September 23, 1998. *535 Ronald R. Ball,

64 Cal.App.4th 785 (1998) SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF CARLSBAD et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. D027407. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. June 9, 1998. *788 COUNSEL Ronald R. Ball, City Attorney, and Jane Mobaldi, Deputy City Attorney, fo

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,

182 F.Supp.2d 221 (2002) Teresa RIVERA CORDERO, Plaintiff(s), v. The AUTONOMOUS MUNICIPALITY OF PONCE, Defendant(s). No. 99-1184 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 22, 2002. Edgardo L. Rivera-Rivera, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Jose L. Gandara, Bauza & Davila, San Juan, PR, for Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER <

392 F.Supp.2d 144 (2005) Erick CARABALLO-SEDA, et al., Plaintiff(s) v. Francisco Javier RIVERA-TORO, Defendant(s). Civil No. 01-1446 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 8, 2005. *145 Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Ivan M. Castro-Ortiz, Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Ur

261 F.Supp.2d 76 (2003) Erick CARABALLO SEDA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Francisco JAVIER RIVERA, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 01-1446(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 9, 2003. *77 Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Ivan M. Castro-Ortiz, Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Claudio Aliff-Ortiz, Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, PR

El Juez Asociado Señor Rivera García emitió la opinión del Tribunal. El recurso de autos nos concede la oportunidad de dilu-cidar si la violación del reglamento de una empresa por uno de sus empleados justifica que el patrono lo despida sin concederle la indemnización mínima dispuesta por la Ley Núm. 80 de 30 de mayo de 1976, según enmendada, 29 L.RR.A. secs. 185a-185m, conocida como Ley de Despido Injustificad

281 F.Supp.2d 329 (2003) Luciano HERNANDEZ CARRASQUILLO, et al. Plaintiffs v. Jose A. RIVERA RODRIGUEZ, et al. Defendants No. CIV. 02-1797(SEC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 2, 2003. *330 *331 Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Ivan M. Castro-Ortíz and Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, E

413 F.Supp.2d 36 (2006) Evelyn RIVERA DIAZ, Plaintiff, v. EXECUTIVE AIRLINES, INC., et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 05-1025(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 17, 2006. *37 *38 Pablo E. Garcia-Perez, Pablo E. Garcia Perez Law Office, Carolina, PR, for Plaintiff. Ang

218 F.Supp.2d 66 (2002) Maria E. GOMEZ CANDELARIA, et al., Plaintiffs v. José A. RIVERA RODRÍGUEZ, et al., Defendants No. CIV. 01-1391(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 25, 2002. *67 Eliezer Aldarondo-Ortiz, Esq., Pablo Landrau-Pirazzi, Esq., San Juan, for Plaintiff. Ismael Rodríguez-Izquierdo, Es