Cases

497 F.Supp.2d 381 (2007) Siew Lian RIVERA a/k/a/ Joanne Rivera, Plaintiff, v. NDOLA PHARMACY CORP., Ndola Holding LLC, Khandubhai Patel, Natvar Patel, Madhusudan Patel, and Abdoul Hameed, Defendants. No. 06-CV-2837 (NGG)(RER). United States District Court, E.D. New York. June 29, 2007. *382 *383

(2008) CARLOS TORRES, BOBBY IRIZARRY, RUBEN MORA, JOSELITO AROCHO, LEWIS CHEWNING, JOSEPH CREMA, ALFRED CROKER, FRANK DELEON, MARIO DIPRETA, WILLIAM HELWIG, ROBERT MISURACA, ROBERT PASTORINO, VICTOR PHELPS, DANIEL SALEGNA, and GILBERTO SANTIAGO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GRISTEDE'S OPERATING CORP., NAMDOR, INC., GRISTEDE'S FOOD, INC., CITY PRODUCE OPERATING CORP., GRISTEDE'S FOODS NY, INC., GALO BAL

ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants, Array Connector Corporation, Bill McPherson, and Bel Fuse, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants!/]”) Joint Defense Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings...(“Motion”) [ECF No. 74], filed on January 15, 2016. Plaintiff, Ramon Ortega (“Ortega”) filed an Opposition... (“Response”) [ECF No. 83] on February 1,

DECISION AND ORDER SPATT-; District Judge. On October 7, 2013, the Plaintiff Pik Quan Leong (the “Plaintiff”) commenced this action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”.); the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207(a)(1), 216(b); New York Executive Law § 296 et seq.; the Administrative Code of the City of New York,

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Joel W. Frederick (“Plaintiff’) filed this action on August 13, 2016, pursu*329ant to: § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 794, for discriminatory treatment due to a perceived disability and unlawf

558 F.Supp.2d 601 (2008) Jill WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sandra LONG, Defendant. Civil No. JFM 07-3459. United States District Court, D. Maryland. June 11, 2008. *602 Howard Benjamin Hoffman, Howard B. Hoffman Esquire, Attorney at Law, Rockville, MD, for Plaintiffs. Sandra Long, Baltimore, MD, pro se. Neal M.

664 F.Supp.2d 704 (2009) Javier SAENZ, Jorge Juarez and Rebecca Arredondo, Plaintiffs, v. AUSTIN ROOFER'S SUPPLY, LLC, d/b/a RSGRP Austin, Ltd. and d/b/a Roofing Supply Group and Arturo Portillo, Defendants. No. EP-09-CV-132-PRM. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, El Paso Division. October 6, 2009. *705 Raymond D. Martinez

661 F.Supp.2d 412 (2009) R. MAGNONI, Plaintiff, v. SMITH & LAQUERCIA, LLP et al., Defendants. No. 07 Civ. 9875 (VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 11, 2009. *413 David Abrams, David Abrams, Attorney at Law, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Thomas Everett Chase, Rottenberg Lipman Rich, P.C., New Yor

Janet C. Hall, United States District Judge This case comes before the court pursuant to a Complaint (Doc. No. 1) filed by the plaintiff, Aetna Life Insurance Company ("Aetna"), against the defendants, Nellina Guerrera ("Guerrera"); Carter Mario Injury Lawyers ("Carter Mario"); Attorney Sean Hammil ("Hammil"); Attorney Danielle Wisniowski ("Wisniowski"); and Big Y Foods, Inc. ("Big Y"). The case arises out of a dispute regarding pay

OPINION & ORDER VALERIE CAPRONI, District Judge. This lawsuit, arising from the acrimonious demise of the relationship between an artist, Plaintiff David LaChapelle, and his agent, Defendant Fred Torres, was commenced on December 21, 2012. As the case currently stands after three amended complaints, LaChapelle and David LaCha-pelle Studios, Inc. (“DLC Studios”) have claims against Torres an

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. This case was transferred in January 2011 from the United State District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where it became part of the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation (MDL 875). The case was assigned to the Court’s maritime docket (“MARDOC”). Willard E. Barte

698 F.Supp.2d 397 (2010) Carlos CHALUISAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SIMSMETAL EAST LLC, Mark Santiago, and John Does 1-10, Defendants. No. 09 Civ. 1182(PGG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 23, 2010. *399 David Stein, Coleman Law Firm, Clifton, NJ, Bradley Ian Berge

643 F.Supp.2d 302 (2009) Adriane PADILLA, Plaintiff, v. Santiago MANLAPAZ a/k/a Sonny Manlapaz; Lilia Reyes a/k/a Lily Reyes; Baguio Corporation a/k/a Baguio Visayas Corporation d/b/a Barrio Fiesta Restaurant a/k/a Barrio Fiesta a/k/a Fiesta Barrio; Visayas Corporation d/b/a Barrio Fiesta Restaurant a/k/a Barrio Fiesta a/k/a Fiesta Barrio; Melpito Corporation a/k/a Melpito Corporation d/b/a Barrio Fiesta Restaurant a/k/a Barrio Fiesta a/k/a Fiest

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. This is the second case to come before this Court involving the written and spoken criticism of the animal euthanasia policy and operational policies at the Southampton Animal Shelter (the “Shelter”) by the Plaintiff Patricia Lynch (the “Plaintiff’). The events underlying the first case, Lynch v. Town of Southampton (“Lynch I”), No. 0

643 F.3d 352 (2011) Greg KUEBEL, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, Sava Ghicas, Plaintiff, v. BLACK & DECKER INC., United States, Defendant-Appellee. Docket No. 10-2273-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: March 10, 2011. Decided: May 5, 2011. *35

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. The Court tried this case without a jury from September 24 to 26, 2013. Claire Rodriguez and Philip Moss, Esqs., appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Dana D. Mohammadi (“Plaintiff”); Glenn Deadman, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendants Augustine Nwabuisi, Rose Nwabuisi, Resource Health Services, Inc., and Resource Care Cor

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES ORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Fanny “Fei Fei” Gunawan (“Gunawan”) has sued defendant Sake Sushi Restaurant, Inc. (the “Restaurant”) for its alleged failure to pay her the wages required under federal and state law. Docket entry (“DE”) 1 (Complaint). The Restaurant initially answered the Complaint, DE 5, and the parties thereafter consented to refer the cas

MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN T. LANEY, III, Chief Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the trustee’s Motion to Reopen Case and the debtors’ objection to the motion. The Court heard oral arguments on the motion and objection on August 22, 2012. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the matter under advisement. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the trustee’s motion.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, District Judge. By a motion filed August 25, 2014, plaintiffs moved for a default judgment. On November 6, 2014, this Court referred the matter to the assigned Magistrate Judge, the Honorable Vera M. Scanlon. On February 27, 2014, Magistrate Judge Scanlon issued a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) recommending that this Court (1)

MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS B. RUSSELL, Chief Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff in this wage and hour lawsuit seeks compensation for his off-the-cloek work and for the denial of his meal and rest breaks pursuant to the Kentucky Wages and Hours Act, KRS Chapter 337. The named Plaintiff in the suit is Eric England, a former employee of the Defendant, Advance Stores Company, Inc., d/