Cases

OPINION DOWNIE, Judge. ¶ 1 This appeal requires us to interpret Arizona Revised Statute (“A.R.S.”) section 23-751.01, which defines “[e]mployment by an Indian tribe” in the context of unemployment insurance. We conclude that wages earned as a member of a tribal legislative body are not qualifying wages for purposes of unemployment insurance benefits. We therefore affirm the determination that Appellant Bobby

144 P.3d 1254 (2006) Guadalupe FALCON, Deceased, by and through her surviving children Antonio SANDOVAL, Jr.; Guadalupe Pratt; Lydia Sandoval; Francisco Sandoval; Aurora Sandoval; Jose Sandoval; Reynaldo Sandoval; Alfredo Sandoval, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARICOPA COUNTY, a body politic; Maricopa Integrated Health Care System, d/b/a Maricopa County Medical Center, an Arizona hospital, Defendants-Appellees. No. CV-06-0106-P

666 F.3d 561 (2011) Trish JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the BOUNDARY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 101; Don Bartling, in his capacity as Superintendent of the Boundary County School District No. 101, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-35233. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 8, 2010. Filed December 8, 20

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA EN BANC GUADALUPE FALCON, Deceased, by ) Arizona Supreme Court and through her surviving ) No. CV-06-0106-PR children ANTONIO SANDOVAL, JR.; ) GUADALUPE PRATT; LYDIA SANDOVAL; ) Court of Appeals FRANCISCO SANDOVAL; AURORA ) Division One SANDOVAL; JOSE SANDOVAL; ) No. 1 CA-CV 04-0801 REYNALDO SANDOVAL; ALFREDO ) SANDOVAL, ) Maricopa County

Maryland Department of the Environment v. County Commissioners of Carroll County, Maryland No. 5, September Term 2018 Frederick County, Maryland v. Maryland Department of the Environment No. 7, September Term 2018 Environmental Law – Administrative Law – Clean Water Act – Stormwater Discharge Permits – Impervious Surface Restoration. The Maryland Department of the Environment may lawfully include an impervious surface restoration requirement in a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) di

Maryland Department of the Environment v. County Commissioners of Carroll County, Maryland No. 5, September Term 2018 Frederick County, Maryland v. Maryland Department of the Environment No. 7, September Term 2018 Environmental Law – Administrative Law – Clean Water Act – Stormwater Discharge Permits – Impervious Surface Restoration. The Maryland Department of the Environment may lawfully include an impervious surface restoration requirement in a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) di

8 Ariz. App. 596 (1968) 448 P.2d 440 ROBBINS INVESTMENT CO., Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Appellant, v. GREEN ROSE ASSOCIATES, INC., a New York corporation, and Ballmary Realties, Inc., a New York corporation, Lionel R. Bauman, Allen D. Emil and Eugene M. Grant, Appellees. No. 2 CA-CIV 491. Court of Appeals of Arizona. December 6, 1968.

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX

OPINION HOWARD, Chief Judge. ¶ 1 The State of Arizona petitions this court for special action review of the respondent judge’s order dismissing its allegation that real-party-in-interest Joel Lopez is not eligible for probation pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-901.01, commonly known as Proposition 200. See State v. Estrada, 201 Ar

193 P.3d 782 (2008) CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation; City of Phoenix Employees' Retirement System Board, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Kenneth L. FIELDS, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, Mary Ann Perez, Lou Krafts, Sherry Gill, Nan Nelson, Dorothy Hansen, Eva Hernandez, Norma Veach, Lillie Dye, Nefretari Salahdeen, Teresa Anderson, Elaine Stockton, Geraldine Mar

FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS AUG 31 2010 STATE OF ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, ) 2 CA-CR 2010-0018-PR

171 Ariz. 90 (1991) 828 P.2d 1231 In the Matter of the Appeal in MARICOPA COUNTY, JUVENILE ACTION NO. JA 33794. No. 1 CA-JUV 91-028. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. September 26, 1991. Review Denied May 19, 1992. *91 Gary E. Robbins, Phoenix, for petitioners. Friedl,

96 P.3d 213 (2004) 208 Ariz. 509 In the Matter of a Disbarred Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Richard B. ARROTTA, Attorney No. 003992, Applicant. No. SB-04-0015-R. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. August 25, 2004. *214 Thomas A. Zlaket, Tucson, Attorney for Richard B. Arrotta. State Bar of Arizona by

LANKFORD, Judge, Dissenting. ¶ 13 I respectfully dissent. We should vacate the order accepting the certified question3 and decline to answer it. Additional review following acceptance of the certified question made it clear that our response to that question is unnecessary. ¶ 14 The question presented is not one that requires our assistance in answering it

188 Ariz. 446 (1996) 937 P.2d 368 Walter R. BUCKELEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF PARKER, acting through its common counsel consisting of Charlene Peterson, Sandy Pierce, Jim Trevino, John Woody, Paul Langseth, Haskell Melton, and Bill Ripberger, real parties in interest; George L. Kruse, Town of Parker Zoning Administrator, and the Town of Parker Zoning Board Of Adjustment consisting of Karl Hartmetz, Conkie Hoover, J

173 Ariz. 612 (1992) 845 P.2d 1107 Jimmie D. DIXON and Carolyn B. Dixon, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation; and Aztec Construction Company, a corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 90-245. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. June 16, 1992. Reconsideration Denie

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge. Benjamin Lachman is a profoundly deaf seven-year-old child who resides within the district boundaries of the East Maine, Illinois School District No. 63 (“the school district”). The school district is a member of the Maine Township Special Education Program (“MSTEP”) and through MSTEP contracts with Northern Suburban Special Education District to provide services for its hearing-impaired students

852 F.2d 290 48 Ed. Law Rep. 105 Ronald LACHMAN and Mary Ann Lachman, on Behalf of BenjaminLachman, a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.ILLINOIS STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION; East Maine SchoolDistrict 63; and Maine Township Special EducationProgram, Defendants-Appellees. No. 87-2518. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit.

ORDER FRANK R. ZAPATA, Senior District Judge. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Estrada. In his Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Estrada recommends denying in part and granting in part Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the motions for summary judgment, the objection

105 Ariz. 374 (1970) 464 P.2d 966 GREYHOUND PARKS OF ARIZONA, INC., an Arizona corporation, Appellant, v. Frank S. WAITMAN, Chairman; John K. Goodman, Vice-Chairman; Donald Butler, Al. A. Marth, and Tom Finley, Commissioners of the Arizona Racing Commission, Appellees. Turf Paradise, Inc., an Arizona corporation; and Arizona Downs, an Arizona corporation, Intervenors. No. 9815.