Cases

731 N.W.2d 676 (2007) David FELDERMAN, Executor of the Estate of Mary Belle Westphal, Deceased, Appellant, v. CITY OF MAQUOKETA, Iowa, Appellee. No. 05-1407. Supreme Court of Iowa. May 11, 2007. *677 Robert F. Wilson of Wilson, Matias, Hauser & Den Beste, Cedar Rapids, for appellant. Michael C. Walker of Hopkins &

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 31 / 05-1407 Filed May 11, 2007 DAVID FELDERMAN, Executor of the Estate of MARY BELLE WESTPHAL, Deceased, Appellant, vs. CITY OF MAQUOKETA, IOWA, Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Jackson County, Mark J. Smith, Judge. Appeal from a district court ruling directing a verdict in favor of the defendant. DECISION OF COURT OF APPEALS VACATED; DI

101 F.Supp.2d 292 (2000) Mark GREENWOOD and Mary Kay Greenwood, h/w, Plaintiffs, v. BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Sesame Place, Surf Coaster Corporation, Waterworld Products, Inc., Fred Langford Enterprises, Inc., and Fred Langford, Defendants. Civil Action No. 99-CV-4321. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 18, 2000. Marcella J. Schell, Da

764 F.2d 502 2 Fed.R.Serv.3d 16 Julian G. NEMMERS, Appellant,v.CITY OF DUBUQUE, an Iowa Municipal Corporation, James E.Brady, D. Michael King, John L. Felderman andMichael W. Pratt, Appellees.Julian G. NEMMERS, Appellee,v.CITY OF DUBUQUE, an Iowa Municipal Corp.; and James E.Brady; Michael King; John L. Felderman; MichaelW. Pratt, Appellants. Nos. 84-1888

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-1571 Filed December 6, 2017 TIMOTHY TOPE, on behalf of Peripheral Solutions, Inc. and VendPrint, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. KRIS GREINER, PERIPHERAL SOLUTIONS, INC., and VENDPRINT, INC., Defendants-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Scott D. Rosenberg, Judge.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–0484 Filed June 12, 2020 KATHRYN MARIE BREESE, Individually and as Mother and Next Friend of E.K.B., a Minor Child, Appellants, vs. CITY OF BURLINGTON, Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Des Moines County, Michael J. Schilling, Judge. Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing tort claims against the cit

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 13-1634 Filed January 28, 2015 CHARLES E. LAKIN, III, CHARLES E. LAKIN, KENNETH R. LAKIN and THE CHARLES E. LAKIN REVOCABLE TRUST, CHARLES E. LAKIN, Trustee, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, vs. RICHARDS FARM LTD, E. JEFFREY RICHARDS and CHRISTOPHER S. RICHARDS, Defendants-Appellees/Cross-Appellants. _______________________________________________________

518 F.Supp.2d 1148 (2007) In re WET SEAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. CV 04-7159 GAF (CTx). United States District Court, C.D. California. August 29, 2007. *1149 *1150 William J. Doyle II of Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robins, LLP, San Diego, CA, and Stephen R. Basser of Barrack, Rodos &

[Cite as Ambrose v. USAA Gen. Indemn. Co., 2022-Ohio-2629.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY MARY AMBROSE, INDIVIDUALLY CASE NO. 2021-P-0108 AND ON BEHALF OF CAROLINE AMBROSE, Civil Appeal from the Plaintiff-Appellant, Court of Common Pleas -v-

413 F.Supp.2d 507 (2005) F.A. DAVIS COMPANY v. WOLTERS KLUWER HEALTH, INC. d/b/a Lippincott Williams & Wilkins No. Civ.A. 05-CV-681. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 16, 2005. *508 *509 C. Frederick Koenig, III, Volpe and Koenig, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for F.A. Davi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS J. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ...................................853 A. Factual Background.................................................853 1. The parties and principal actors................

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. In 1980, Julian G. Nemmers sued the City of Dubuque for its uncompensated taking of his land when it was rezoned from light industrial to a residential classification. When the case was first appealed to this Court, we reversed the district court’s dismissal of the case, held that Nemmers had a vested right in the zoned status of his land, and remanded the case to the district court to determine the pr

256 F.Supp. 55 (1966) ROSEMONT ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, v. RANDOM HOUSE, INC. and John Keats, Defendants. No. 66 Civ. 1532. United States District Court S. D. New York. June 25, 1966. *56 *57 *58 Katz, Moselle & Schier, New York City, for plaintiff

In this case the Board of Revision of Taxes of the City and County of Philadelphia assessed the premises Nos. 1301-25 Chestnut Street, Ninth Ward, Philadelphia (John Wanamaker Philadelphia main department store) for purposes of taxation for the year 1947 at $19,705,300. Believing the assessment to be excessive the owner, John Wanamaker Philadelphia, took an appeal to this court and Judge Byron A. Milner of this court after a hearing de novo, at which both the appellee and appellant, presented