Cases

Supreme Court of Florida ____________ No. SC14-1165 ____________ IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 1-7.3. [July 9, 2015] PER CURIAM. Pursuant to Rule 1-12.1 of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar (Bar Rules),1 522 members in good standing with The Florida Bar (Petitioners) have filed a

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1170 STATE OF NEW JERSEY; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF HAWAI'I; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, on behalf of the People of Michigan; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 16-1423C, 18-853C (Filed: July 20, 2022) FOR PUBLICATION *************************************** PATRICIA HADDOCK, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * THE UNITED STAT

KEVIN GROSS, U.S.B.J. Corporate Claims Management, Inc. ("CCMI" or the "Company") brings this adversary proceeding against Michelle Shaiper ("Shaiper") and Brentwood Services Administrators, Inc. ("Brentwood") (collectively with Shaiper, the "Defendants"). In a thirteen count complaint (the "Complaint"), CCMI alleges that through use of the Company's trade secrets, confidential and proprietary information (collectively, the "Misappropriated I

[Cite as Eckel v. Bowling Green State Univ., 2010-Ohio-3225.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0177p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ NETCHOICE, LLC, │ Plaintiff-Appel

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-00212-COA EDWARD STUART AND JUDY STUART APPELLANTS v. ST. DOMINIC-JACKSON MEMORIAL APPELLEES HOSPITAL AND STEPHEN CRAWFORD DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/28/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JEFF WEILL SR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. This is a § 1983 case that challenges the constitutionality of New Mexico's system of bail. Plaintiffs-Appellants Darlene Collins, the Bail Bond Association of New Mexico ("BBANM"), and five New Mexico state legislators (the "Legislator Plaintiffs") allege that New Mexico's system of bail violates the Excessive Bail Clause of the Eighth Amendment, as well as the

MEMORANDUM Joan N. Feeney, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Plaintiff in this adversary proceeding, the Chapter 7 Trustee of the Debtor - (the “Plaintiff’ or “Trustee”), on Counts I and III of his Complaint, through which he seeks to avoid an alleged fraudulent transfer by the Debtor to the Defend

Justice THOMAS, dissenting. Today a majority of the Court perpetuates its ill-founded abortion jurisprudence by enjoining a perfectly legitimate state law and doing so without jurisdiction. As is often the case with legal challenges to abortion regulations, this suit was brought by abortionists and abortion clinics. Their sole claim before this Court is that Louisiana's law violates the purported substantive due process right of

ORDER GRANTING THE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; GRANTING THE MOTION FOR PROVISIONAL CLASS CERTIFICATION; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN FULL THE NON-FEDERAL DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No. 51, 54, 58, 61 VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING ) HALE AND DORR LLP, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. 25-917 (RJL) V. ) ) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE ) PRESIDENT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________ _)

AMENDED OPINION (amending DE 200) KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge *215Dr. Richard A. Kaul, an anesthesiologist by training, claims to be a minimally invasive spine surgeon. In March 2014, the New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners (the "Board") said otherwise. Because his performance of spine surgeries on 11 patients wit

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1739 ST. DOMINIC ACADEMY, d/b/a Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland, a corporation sole; ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF PORTLAND, a corporation sole; KEITH RADONIS, on their own behalf and as next friend of children K.Q.R., L.R.R., and L.T.R.; VALORI RADONIS, on their own behalf and as next friend of children K.Q.R., L.R.R., and L.T.R., Plaintiffs, Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER COLE, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs have moved for a determination of whether the attorney-client privilege applies to certain documents that defendants, Noranda, Inc. and Falconbridge Limited (collectively, “Noranda defendants”), claim are protected from discovery, despite their prior inadvertent production. As to others,

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2024 UT 28 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH, on behalf of itself and its patients, physicians, and staff, Appellee, v. STATE OF UTAH, GOVERNOR SPENCER J. COX, in his offi

650 A.2d 202 (1994) Margaret P. MURPHY, et al., Appellants, v. LaShawn J. McCLOUD, et al., Appellees. No. 92-PR-893. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued January 12, 1994. Decided December 1, 1994. Gary W. Diamond, for appellants. Carl G. Rollins, for appellees. Before FERREN, STEADMAN, and SCHWELB, Associate Judges. SC