Cases

McCullough, judge. Plaintiff Jackson Kahihu challenges an order granting defendant Integon National Insurance Company’s motion for directed verdict. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm the order of the trial court. *143 I. Background On 23 September 2

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-0083 _____________________________ LEON BRUNSON JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Steven B. Whittington, Judge. May 11, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. LEWIS, ROBERTS, a

675 S.E.2d 97 (2009) Samuel Keith BRUNSON, Petitioner, v. George TATUM, Commissioner, of North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles, Respondent. No. COA08-386. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. April 21, 2009. *98 McLeod & Harrop, by Donald E. Harrop, Jr., Dunn, for petitioner-appellant. Attorney General Roy Cooper, b

In re Mehaffíe, Emily H.W.; Virginia University Rector & Visitors; Hayne, C. Peck; Rudolph, William B. individually and as Trustee of Mary Hayne Bailey Rudolph Trust; Hayne, Frank B. Ill; Trinity Church (Episcopal); Tulane Educational Fund Administrators; — Defendants); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Richland, 5th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 38,604-C; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 43,347-CA.

ORDER TERRY L. WOOTEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Andrew Brunson, Logan Braddock, and Casey Atkinson (“Plaintiffs”), all minors, filed the instant declaratory judg*712ment action through their parents and guardians ad litem in the South Carolina Court of Common Pleas Fourth Judicial Circuit, County of Darlington, on December 21, 2005. (Doc. # 1). D

*910OPINION Opinion by Justice BRIDGES. Frank Liptak, a Florida resident, appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Megan Brunson on the ground Liptak’s personal injury suit was barred by limitations. In two issues, Liptak argues the statute of limitations in this case was tolled under section 16.063 of the Texas Civil Pra

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-530V Filed: September 3, 2020 PUBLISHED Special Master Horner SHAUNYIA BRUNSON, on behalf of T.A., deceased., Sud

[Cite as Weser v. Brunson, 2026-Ohio-1980.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ATHENS COUNTY MICHAEL WESER, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 24CA37 : v. : :

245 S.W.3d 132 (2006) Larry Darnell BRUNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 06-710. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 14, 2006. *135 Montgomery, Adams & Wyatt, PLC, by: Dale E. Adams, Little Rock, for appellant. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: LeaAnn J. Irvin, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee. ANN

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. RODERICK GERRARD BRUNSON No. COA08-1001 Court of Appeals of North Carolina Filed August 4, 2009 This case not for publication Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General James A. Wellons, for the State. J. Clark Fischer, for defendant-appellant. CALABRIA, Judge. Roderick Gerrard Brunson ("def

989 So.2d 246 (2008) Robert L. BRUNSON and Lydia Mae Brunson, Trustees of The Robert Lee Brunson Revocable Living Trust, et al, Plaintiffs-Appellees. v. J.A. HEMLER, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 43,347-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. August 13, 2008. *248 Frank B. Hayne, III, for Appellants. Hallack

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 426 CA 14-01661 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. BRENDA C. HARRINGTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARY A. BRUNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.) FORSYTH, HOWE, O’DWYER, KALB & MURPHY, P.C., ROCHESTER (SANFORD R. SHAPIRO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK, PLLC, P

378 F.Supp.2d 100 (2005) Joseph BRUNSON, pro se, Petitioner, v. Frank TRACY, Superintendent, Downstate Correctional Facility, Respondent. No. 03-CV-1895 (DLI)(ASC). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 2, 2005. *101 *102 *103 Joseph Brunson, F

602 F.Supp.2d 711 (2009) Andrew BRUNSON, a minor, by and through his natural father and Guardian Ad Litem, Bryan BRUNSON; Logan Braddock, a minor, by his natural parent and Guardian Ad Litem, Winnie B. King; and Casey Atkinson, a minor, by her natural parents and Guardians Ad Litem, John and Chris Atkinson, Plaintiffs, v. CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Lorenzo Arthur d/b/a Lorenzo Arthur Trucking; Emanuel Fri

79 S.W.3d 304 (2002) 349 Ark. 300 Larry Darnell BRUNSON v. STATE of Arkansas. No. CR 01-1172. Supreme Court of Arkansas. June 13, 2002. *305 Montgomery, Adams & Wyatt, PLLC, by Dale E. Adams, Little Rock, for appellant. Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by Clayton K. Hodges, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock,

HUFF, Judge: James R. Brunson brought this declaratory judgment action against Chief Robert Stewart in his official capacity as Director of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED). Brunson sought an order declaring that his right to purchase, own, and possess a firearm was restored when he received a pardon of his conviction of a crime of violence. The circuit court judge determined that a conviction for a crime o

944 So.2d 922 (2006) Jerry Ross BRUNSON, Appellant v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2005-KA-00903-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. December 12, 2006. *923 Michael Duane Mitchell, attorney for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by W. Glenn Watts, attorney for appellee. Before LEE, P.J., IRVING and I

351 S.C. 313 (2002) 569 S.E.2d 385 Elayne Thomas Ann SCOTT (Brunson), Respondent, v. John Q. BRUNSON, Sr., Trustee Trust for Robert Ashley Brunson u/w of Muldrow McCoy Brunson, Appellant. No. 3538. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard May 7, 2002. Decided July 29, 2002. Rehearing Denied September 18, 2002.

Phipps, Judge. A jury found Phillip M. Brunson guilty of driving with an unlawful alcohol concentration and driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent that it was less safe for him to drive. He appeals, claiming that the trial court erred by (1) denying his motion in limine to exclude the results of the State-administered breath test, which was based on his assertion that the State failed to observe him for 20 minu

¶ 31. (dissenting). "against the insurer" What happened to those words? The majority opinion in essence rewrites Wis. Stat. § 631.15(3m) and deletes those words. The end result: the insurance company wins and the policyholder, who was sold illegal illusory coverage, inevitably loses. ¶ 32. How can this happen? Not easily. To reach this conclusion the majority must ignore the plain meaning of th